MSc Management Personal Effectiveness Assignment Help

1. MSc Management Personal Effectiveness Assignment Help MSc Management Personal Effectiveness BPP Business School CourseworkCoverSheet Please use this document as the cover sheet of for the 1st page of your assessment. Please complete the below table — the grey columns ModuleName Personal Effectiveness Programme Name StudentReferenceNumber

2. (SRN) AssessmentTitle Pleasecompletetheyellowsectionsinthebelowdeclaration: By submitting this course work you agree to all rules and regulations of BPP regarding assessments and awards for programmes. Please note that by submitting this assessment you are declaring that you are fittosit this assessment. BPP University reserves the right touse all submitted work for educational purposes and may request that work be published for a wider audience. MSc Management Personal Effectiveness CourseworkAssessmentBrief Submissionmode:Turnitinon lineaccess

3. General Assessment Guidance Your summative assessment for this module is made up of this course work submission which accounts for 100% of the marks Please note late submissions will no tbemarked. You are required to submit all elements of your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only submissionsmadeviathespecifiedmode willbeacceptedandhardcopiesoranyotherdigital form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted. Forcoursework,thesubmission wordlimitis2500words.Youmustcomplywiththewordcount guidelines. You may submit LESS than 2500 words but not more. Word Count guidelines can befound on your programme home page and the coursework submission page. Do notput your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put yourstudentregistrationnumber(SRN)which

4. willensureyoursubmissionisrecognisedinthe marking process. Atotalof100marksareavailableforthismoduleassessment, andyouarerequiredtoachieve minimum 50% to pass this module. Youarerequiredtouseonly HarvardReferencingSysteminyoursubmission. Anycontentwhich is already published by other author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism. BPPUniversityhasastrictpolicyregarding authenticityofassessments.In proveninstancesof plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to readtherulesandregulationsregardingplagiarismandcollusi onintheGARsandMOPPwhich are available on VLE in the Academic registry section. YoushouldincludeacompletedcopyoftheAssignmentCove rsheet.Anysubmission without this completed Assignment Cover sheet may be considered invalid and not marked.

5. YoucanfindfurtherinformationonHarvardReferencinginth eonlinelibraryontheVLE.Youcan use the following link to access this information: http://bpp.libguides.com/Home/StudySupp ort Assessment Brief Therequiredsubmissionforthisassignmentisa 2500words“Pers onalEffectivenessReport”. Your report willinclude reflection on skills for a chosen career, comparison of own skill set/habits to choice of career, and analysis of methods for enhancing personal effectiveness. StudentsarerequiredtocompleteThreetasks: 1.Reflect onyourownskillsetinrelationtoacareergoal. 2.Assessyourhabits/behavioursandhowtheymayimpactyourc areer. 3.Analysemethodsofenhancingpersonaleffectivenessandimpr ovingpersonalbranding. The Learning Outcomes to successfully pass this assessment are:

6. (LO1)Criticallyevaluatehowpeoplelearnforprofessional development. (LO2)Appraisethekeyskillsandbehavioursrequiredtobeeffectiv einaprofessional context. (LO3)Demonstrateunderstandingofarangeofmethods ofsupportingpersonaleffectivenessina professional environment. YourPersonalEffectivenessReportshouldcontainthefo llowing: Introduction Youshouldbeginbyanintroductiontoconceptofpersonaleffective ness. You should also give a brief overview of tasks 1, 2 and Struggling with complex assignments? Visit our HND Assignment Help page for professional guidance. 3.TASK1 1.Usingamodelof reflectivepractice,reflect onataskthatyoucompletedatworkoruniversityto identify

7. your own skill set. Identify both your strengths and weaknesses. 2.Analysetheskillsyouidentifiedwithreferencetoyourchoiceofc areerorjob. N.B. To support your answer, you should refer to the reflective model by Gibbs or Schön and additionalreadingresourcesfromthismodule.Youshouldalsoin cludeideasfromarticlesonwider leadership concepts and personal effectiveness from the online library. (Thistaskmeets LO2) TASK2 1.Using the Covey self-assessment questionnaire, identify your own strengths and weaknesses.Explainthesewithexamplesfromyourown life. (Includeascreenshotofthe results from the questionnaire in the appendix). 2.Discusshowyourweaknessescanimpactyourchosencareer.

8. N.B.Youshouldsupportyouranalysiswithreferencestoaddition alreadingresourcesfromthis module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library. (Thistaskmeets LO1) TASK3 Choose a maximum of two areas for improvement (weaknesses) from Tasks 1 and 2. Developaconciseshort- termplanusingtheSMARTmodel ortheAgilemodel toimprove these areas. Explain how these plans will enhance your personal brand. N.B.Youshouldsupportyouranswerwithreferencestoadditiona lreadingresourcesfromthis module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library. (Thistaskmeets LO3) Conclusion Youwillneedtosummarisethekeypointsoftheassessmenttasks.

9. Youshouldendwithaconcludingstatementonthemaintopic ofthereport. Structure YourPersonalEffectivenessreportshouldcontainthe following: BPPassignmentcoversheet(includingSRNandwordcount) PersonalEffectivenessreporttitle page Contentspage Introduction(200words) Task1(800 words) Task2(800 words) Task3(500 words) Conclusion(200words) References(CorrectHarvardReferencingappliedthroughout, includingin-textcitationand reference list) Appendices(ifrequired)

10. Glossary(optional) Marking Guide NumericalGrade30–39%40–49%50–59%60–69%70– 79%80– 100%FinalGradeFailLowFailPassMeritDistinctionHig hDistinctionLOsLO1 (CriticallyInadequateorLimitedSatisfactoryGoodidenti ficationandExcellentOutstandingidentificationevaluateh owweak idenficationidentificationandidentificationdiscussio nofownidentificationandanddiscussionofownpeoplelearn foranddiscussionofdiscussionofownanddiscussionweaknesses /poorhabitsdiscussionofownweaknesses/poorhabitsprofessi onalownweaknesses/poorofownwithclearpersonalweaknesses /poorwithexplicit personaldevelopment.)weaknesses/poorhabits.Limitedweak nesses/poexamplesincludedhabitswithexplicitexamplesusedto illustrate habits.Noclarityinclarityinthelinkorhabitswithillustratingtheirl istofpersonalexamplesidentifiedskills/habits. the link topersonalto personalsomeexampleshabits.Resultsofincluded.ResultsofRes ultsofquestionnaire

11. developmentanddevelopmentandincluded.Linktoquestionnair eincludedquestionnaireincludedandexplicitly chosencareer.chosencareer.personalandclearlyreferred toincludedandreferredtothroughoutthe Doesnot includeQuestionnairedevelopmentthroughoutthetaskexplicitly referred totaskwithexceptionaldepth questionnaireresultsareandchosenwithsatisfactorydepththrou ghoutthetaskinanalysis.Explicitlinksto resultsProvidesamissingorcareerisinanalysis.Clearlinkstowithg oodlevelpersonaldevelopment and weakexplanationincomplete.evident.Resultspersonaldevelopm entdepthinanalysis.chosencareerwithaclear ofpersonalProvideslimitedofquestionnaireandchosencareer.Ex plicitlinkstounderstandingofthelinks strengthsandexplanationincludedbut personalbetweenpersonal weaknesseswithoutlacksdepthin developmentanddevelopmentandcareer withoutexamples.examples.analysis. chosencareer.growth.LO2 (AppraiseWeak reflectionLimitedreflectionSatisfactoryG oodreflectionwithExcellentreflectionOutstandingreflectio nwiththekey skillsandandlimitedclaritywithsomeclarityreflectionwithclear

12. identificationofwithadeepandanexceptionalandbehavioursin appraising keyinidentifyingexplicitpersonalskillsetandbalancedcomprehe nsiverequiredtobeskillsandpersonalskillset.identificationofp ersonalisation.Appliesunderstandingofunderstandingofperson aleffectiveinabehavioursAppliesSchonorpersonalskilltherefle ctivemodelpersonalskillsetskillsetwith clearprofessionalrequiredinaGibbsreflectiveset.Appliesaeffe ctively.Identifiesshowcasedthroughpersonalisationandcontex t.)professionalmodeleffectivelyreflectivemodelbothstrengthsa ndpersonalisationandexamples.Applies the context. Doesn’ttosomeextent.effectively.weaknesseswithdepthexample s.Appliesreflectivemodelwith applyanyreflectionIdentifiesbothIdentifiesbothandclarityinana lysisthereflectivemodelexcellentdepth and orappliesamodelstrengthsandstrengthsandwithexplicitreferen ceexceptionally well.coherence.Identifiesbothbutlacks depth.weaknessesbutweaknessestoachosen career.Identifiesbothstrengthsandweaknesses lacksdepthinwitha strengthsandwithexceptionalclarityand analysis.satisfactory weaknessescoherence.Analysesskill set levelofdepth comprehensively.withexplicitreferencetoa

13. andanalyses Analysesskillsetchosencareer,including withreference withexplicitexceptionaldepthand toa chosen referencetoaprecision. career. chosencareer which includesexceptional depthand precision. LO3InadequateorLimitedSatisfactoryGoodid entificationofExcellentOutstandingidentification(Demons trateweak identificationidentificationofidentificationoftwoar easofidentificationofofareasofdevelopmentunderstandingof ofareasofareasoftwoareasofdevelopmentwithclearareasofwitha nexceptionalandarangeofdevelopmentwithdevelopmentdevel opmentandcoherentrelevancedevelopmentwithacomprehensiv emethodsoflimitedrelevancewithrelevancetowithexplicittoth eprevioustasks.thoroughunderstandingoftheirsupportingtot hepreviousthepreviousrelevancetotheCreatesashort- termunderstandingofdirectapplicationtothepersonaltasks.Cr eatesatasks.Createsaprevioustasks.planwithdepthandtheirrele vancetoprevioustasks.Createsaeffectivenessinashort- termplanshort-termplanCreatesashort- clarityinobjectivesandtheprevioustasks.short-termplan withprofessionalwithsomegapswith sometermplanwithaactions.IdentifiesandCreatesaexceptionalc larity,environment.)andlimitations.elementsbutsatisfactory analysesmethodswithcomprehensivecoherence,feasibility, and

14. Identifiesandlacksdepthandlevelofdepthgooddepthandclarity short-termplan withinnovation.Identifiesand analysessomespecificity.andspecificity.inanalysis.Clearlylinkse xceptionaldepth,analysesmethodswith methodsbutlacksIdentifiesandIdentifiesandpersonaldevelop mentprecision,andOutstandingclarity, depthandanalysessomeanalysestopersonal branding.feasibility.coherence,feasibility, and relevance.Doesn’tmethodsbuthasmethodswitha Comprehensivelyinnovation.Linkspersonal linktopersonallimited depthandsatisfactory identifiesandde velopmentto personal branding.relevance.levelofdepth analysesmethodsbrandingwithexceptional Limitedlinktoandrelevance. withExcellentdepthclarity, coherence, personalLinkspersonal andprecision.feasibility,andinnovation. branding.developmentto Explicitlylinksand personal explainspersonal branding developmentto satisfactorily. personalbranding. AcademicskillsInadequate or weak academic/intellect ual skills with few difficulties.Largely original work with some

15. evidence of reflection and critique. Structure and accuracy in expression beginning to emerge. Limited academic/intellec tualskills.Original work with personal reflection and broad evidence- based critique. Solid structure andaccuracyin expression. Practical/professi onal skills evident. Satisfactory academic/intell ectual skills. Wholly original workwithgood reflection and solid, well- reasoned judgements forming from evidence-based critique. Consistent structure and accuracy in expression. Practical/profes sional skills established. Good academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates intellectualoriginality and imaginationExcellent academic/intellectua lskills.Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity,

16. coherence and imagination.Outstanding academic/intellectualskills. Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity, coherence, creativity and imagination working consistently in the higher cognitive domains to a professional standard.Referencing Inadequate or weak references and notes with minor or insignificanterrors oromissions. Limited and full and appropriate references and noteswithminor or insignificant errors Satisfactorywithprecise,full andappropriate references and notes.Good with precise, full and appropriate referencesandnotesat a high standard. Excellent with precise, full and appropriate referencesandnotes at near-publishing standard.

17. Outstandingwithprecise, full and appropriate references and notes at publishing standard. Stay updated with Australian education trends at Punjab Assignment Help