modern farming and rural poverty pros and cons of sri l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
“Modern” Farming and Rural Poverty Pros and Cons of SRI PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
“Modern” Farming and Rural Poverty Pros and Cons of SRI

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 19

“Modern” Farming and Rural Poverty Pros and Cons of SRI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 351 Views
  • Uploaded on

“Modern” Farming and Rural Poverty Pros and Cons of SRI Willem A. Stoop 23 January 2009 IFAD, Rome Personal Background Soils and agronomy (Wageningen and UH) Rubber agronomist Liberia Postdoc CIMMYT (Maize agron.) Mexico Agronomist ICRISAT / Burkina Faso

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about '“Modern” Farming and Rural Poverty Pros and Cons of SRI' - Gabriel


Download Now An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
modern farming and rural poverty pros and cons of sri

“Modern” Farming and Rural PovertyPros and Cons of SRI

Willem A. Stoop

23 January 2009

IFAD, Rome

personal background
Personal Background
  • Soils and agronomy (Wageningen and UH)
  • Rubber agronomist Liberia
  • Postdoc CIMMYT (Maize agron.) Mexico
  • Agronomist ICRISAT / Burkina Faso
  • Tropical Rainfed Cereal Systems - KIT/RTI
  • ISNAR - The Hague : NARS organisation
  • KIT/RTI : Systems research
  • Independent consultant / WARDA
ifad website
IFAD website
  • 1,05 billion poor women, men and children in developing countries
  • Poor populations mostly in rural areas
  • Depend mostly on agriculture and related activities for livelihoods
slide4

Do the “rural poor” require specific agricultural techniques?and if soHow might these techniques differ from the conventional ones that are readily available? orWhat type of agronomy would be most relevant to the poor?

slide5

System of Rice Intensification (SRI)developed in Madagascar during 1980s in response to the conditions, needs and means of resource-poor smallholders

major contrasts between modern and smallholder rice farming
Modern Farming:

Large / intermediate scale

Commercial

Mechanised

External inputs (seeds, ag.chemicals)

Capital intensive

Smallholder farming:

Small – variable scale

Self sufficiency – surplus

Mainly manual

Local inputs (seeds, manure, compost, etc.)

Labour intensive

Major contrasts between “modern” and “smallholder” rice farming
major elements of sri as compared with conventional practices
SRI:

very low seed rates

very young transplants:

8 to 15 days old

single transplants/hill

wide spacing:

25x25 to 50x50 cm

no flooding, moist soil

compost

3 to 4 rounds rotary hoe

Conventional irrigated:

high seed rates

young transplants:

about 21days old

3-5 transplants/hill

narrow spacing:

10x10 to 20x20 cm

continuous flooding

min. fertilizer + N topdressing

2 rounds rotary hoe / herbicide

Major elements of SRI as compared with conventional practices
crucial plant features in obtaining high yields with sri
Crucial plant features in obtaining high yields with SRI
  • Profuse tillering
  • Profuse root systems

“What will be the optimum bio-physical growth conditions that cause these features to translate into high grain yields?”

pros and cons of sri
Pros

Substantial savings:

*Seed (suitability of local varieties)

*Seed rates: 1/5 to 1/10

*Irr. Water: approx. 30-50%

*No or limited agric. chem’s

*Tolerance to drought and lodging

Incr. resource use efficiency

No envirm. pollution

Cons

Labour requirements??

*Delicate timing of operations

*Increased (early) weeding

(Precise land levelling)

(Reliable water source/supply)

Risks??

*Delicate, small transplants

*Early floods

*Local socio-institutional: avail. irrig. water / landtenure issues.

Pros and cons of SRI
sri is not a free lunch or blue print
SRI is NOT a “free lunch” or “blue-print”
  • It requires farming skills: timely management of operations and efficient use of internal resources.
  • With experience SRI can produce attractive grain yields without or with minimal use of costly external inputs through very simple agronomic adjustments.
  • SRI must be viewed as part of a (integrated) farming system.
  • Location/farmer-specific adaptations are crucial.
  • Most initial constraints/risks are of a farm management nature.
possible barriers to sri dissemination
Possible barriers to SRI dissemination
  • For past decades farmers have been bombarded with recipes for “green revolution” technologies including new seeds and agric. chemicals (mineral fertilisers, herbicides and pesticides).
  • By comparison SRI advises something like an “opposite” combination of practises.
  • Certainly in Africa, foreign aid and public extension services have lost much of their credibility with small farmers.
implications for dissemination of sri
Implications for dissemination of SRI
  • “Learning” exercise for farmers, extension and scientists:
    • Farmer field schools
    • Farmer organisations / farmer-to-farmer
    • Encourage small-scale, individual farmer experimentation
  • Flexibility in dissemination process: “principles” are introduced, NOT standardised technologies
  • Monitor technological adaptations introduced by farmers
  • Accept initial slow adoption rates, while all stakeholders gain experience
present global status of sri
Present (global) status of SRI
  • Principles validated in some 30 countries.
  • Increasingly and successfully practised by small farmers in major rice producing countries (India, China).
  • Agro-ecological mechanisms involved remain unclear for lack of adequate research (out-of-the-box thinking).
general significance of sri principles and wider relevance to ifad
General significance of SRI principles and wider relevance to IFAD
  • For other (cereal) crops.
  • For the resource-poor farmer target group.
  • For environment-friendly agricultural practices: increased efficiency of external input use (seeds and agric. chemicals).