1 / 52

Outside Looking In: Stalkers and Their Victims

Outside Looking In: Stalkers and Their Victims. Doris Hall, Ph.D. California State University Bakersfield. Stalking (CA P.C. 646.9). Willfully, maliciously and repeatedly follows or harasses another person, Who makes a credible threat

Gabriel
Download Presentation

Outside Looking In: Stalkers and Their Victims

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Outside Looking In: Stalkers and Their Victims Doris Hall, Ph.D. California State University Bakersfield

  2. Stalking (CA P.C. 646.9) • Willfully, maliciously and repeatedly follows or harasses another person, • Who makes a credible threat • With the intent to place that person in fear for their safety or the safety of their immediate family

  3. Stalking Victims

  4. Post Intimate • Ex-Husbands • Ex-wives • Ex-boyfriends • Ex-girlfriends

  5. Prior Acquaintances • Acquaintances • Neighbors • Former friends • Co-workers • Students • Ex-patients • Relatives • Rapists

  6. Unknown • Early on in a stalking situation • You know someone is following and/or harassing • But you do not know who it is (yet) • Most stalkers will let victim know who they are

  7. False Victimization (FV) • Very rare (2%) • Usually females • Turns out the victim is actually the perpetrator • Attention seeking behavior

  8. FVS Red Flags • Come forward gleefully • Wants to share all the details • Expresses little fright • Seems to be enjoying the attention • Encourages police/3rd parties to set up a “meeting” so they can talk to stalker

  9. FVS Red Flags • Many FVS have history of self mutilation • Suicide attempts • False claims often follow major life distressors or dramatic moments

  10. Stalker ContactSurveillance Techniques • Following • Drive bys • Appearing at workplace • Wiretap telephones • Home surveillance

  11. Stalker ContactHarassment • Letters • Phone calls • Threats • Unwanted gifts • Mail tampering • Cancel utilities • False police reports

  12. Stalker ContactProperty Damage • Slashed tires • Broken windshields • Poison outdoor plants • Cut up clothing • Break into home

  13. Stalker ContactViolence • Occurs in 30% of cases • Physical assault • Sexual assault • Kidnapping • Killing or injuring pets

  14. Protective Orders • Of the 44% of the respondents who obtained a restraining order • 20% rated them as effective in controlling stalking behavior • 80% rated them as ineffective

  15. Restraining Orders Two schools of thought: • Yes, always get one versus • Maybe, it depends on the situation

  16. Restraining orders (cont). • “Law Enforcement Tools” • If a restraining order is violated it becomes a felony versus a misdemeanor.

  17. Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005) • U.S. Supreme Court decision (7-2) held that respondent’s 14th amendment Due Process Clause was not violated by failure of police to enforce restraining order against her estranged husband • Tragic case in Colorado.

  18. Dramatic Moments life events which are likely to humiliate or shame to perpetrator, stoke his fury, and increase his risk of violence. • Examples include but are not limited to: • stalkers first approach to and rejection by the target • Unacknowledged gifts, letters, etc. • Issuance of restraining order • First court appearance

  19. Tjaden findings • 1 in 12 females will be stalked during their lifetime (8-12% of population) • 1 in 45 men will be stalked during their lifetime (2-4% of population)

  20. Australia • 15% of the population will be stalked sometime during their lifetime • Australia has a less stringent definition of stalking than the U.S.

  21. U.S. College students • Several studies have found that approximately 27% of college students are stalked during their college years • Possible reasons for this finding • Developmental deficits in social skills • Structure of college life

  22. Routine Activities Theory • Three elements: • Motivated offender • Suitable target • Lack of capable guardianship

  23. Stalkers • When compared to other criminals, stalkers tend to be: • Older • Higher IQ • More educated

  24. Demographic Characteristics of Stalkers • Male (75%-87%) • Mid to late 30s • Average or above average intellectual functioning • High School or above educational attainment • History of failed intimate relationships • Immigration may be a risk factor (10%) • Prior psychiatric history

  25. Zona’s Typology • Erotomania • AKA Old Maid’s Syndrome • Delusional belief that another person, usually of a higher status, is in love with them

  26. Zona’s TypologyErotomania • Subtype: Male Erotomanic • Usually from countries where the genders are kept separate. • Example Tarasoff v. U.C. Berkeley

  27. Zona’s TypologyErotomania • Athena Rolando broke into Brad Pitts home • Wore his clothes, slept in his bed, fed his dogs • What did she get?

  28. Zona’s TypologyAthena • Two days in jail • 36 months probation • 15 days graffiti removal • 3 years psychological counseling • 100 yards restraining order • And….

  29. Zona’s TypologyAthena (continued) • A guest on the Leeza Gibbons Show • Howard Stern Show • And Inside Edition

  30. Zona’s TypologyLove Obessional • Person knows that the other person is not in love with them…yet… • Example John Hinckley, Jr.’s obsession with Jodie Foster • This type of stalker might be the one that flattens your tire and then offers to fix it.

  31. Zona’s TypologySimple Obsession • Basically everyone else. • Includes all

  32. Stalker TypologyBoone & Sheridan • A law enforcement perspective • Developed by a profiler in England • N=124 • Four types

  33. Boone & SheridanExpartner Harassment/Stalking • 50% • Overt threats • Hostile • Recruits family & friends • High risk for violence • Victim should avoid perpetrator • May want to consider relocating

  34. Boone & SheridanInfatuation Harassment • 19% • Target is “beloved” • Non-malicious ruses • Low levels of danger • Perpetrator in teens to mid-life • Police need to be sympathetic, but explain victim is not interested

  35. Boone & SheridanSadistic Stalker • 13% • Victim seen as prey • Initially low level acquaintance • Communications blend of love and threats • Take very seriously • Very difficult to stop this stalker • Do not give victim false hope • Victim should move to secret location & change identity

  36. Boone & SheridanDelusional Fixation Stalking • 15% • Incoherent, yet fixated • High risk for physical and/or sexual violence • Borderline personality • Not responsive to rejection • Protective orders do not deter • Refer to forensic psychologist

  37. Mullen & Pathe TypologyRejected • Desire for reconciliation • Stalking is substitute for lost relationship • Very intrusive & persistent

  38. Mullen & Pathe TypologyIntimacy Seeker • Object is their true love • Star stalkers

  39. Mullen & Pathe TypologyIncompetent • Intellectually limited • Short duration • Serial stalker

  40. Mullen & Pathe TypologyResentful • Aggrieved workers • Feels humiliated • Vendetta for specific person

  41. Mullen & Pathe TypologyPredatory • Exclusively male • Physical and sexual assault • Often serial killers

  42. Spitzberg’s Obsession Relational Intrusion • Repeated and unwanted pursuit and invasion of one’s sense of physical or symbolic privacy by another person, either stranger or acquaintance, who desires and/or presumes an intimate relationship

  43. Spitzberg’s ORI • Even mild forms are viewed as moderately threatening • Behaviors are on a continuum • At some point they can cross over into stalking behavior • Discusses the “Gray Area” of when behavior becomes stalking

  44. Spitzberg’s ORI • Four different motives • “Lovers” seek to care for and cherish target • “Haters” seek to harm, scare, intimidate, destroy or seek revenge • “Controllers” seek to plan, manipulate and contain or restrain • “Expressers” display their feelings and inner urges as they occur without cognitive editing

  45. Conviction rate of stalkers • Approximately 50% of stalking victims report the crime to the police • 13% of female victims report conviction of stalker versus 9% of male victims • If you include other crimes committed by stalker (but not the actual crime of stalking) conviction rates increase to: • 24% for female victims and 19% for male victims

  46. DeBecker’s JACA • JACA is a prediction about violence • Justification for violence • Alternatives to violence • Consequences of violence • Ability to follow through on the violence

  47. Risk Management • Critical part of risk management is frequent and effective communication. • If the police or employer takes action which might anger or embarrass the stalker • Target needs to be advised or the stalking victim is put at further risk

  48. Red flags (continued) • ingratiation with the target’s co-workers or family members • Chronic lying or excuse making • Repeat questioning about how the target spends time and with whom

  49. Stalking Red Flags • Chronic privacy intrusions at work or at home • A need for the stalker to be physically close and to frequently touch the target • Prolonged staring at the target without verbalization • Repeat and unwanted gift giving

  50. DeBecker says: • “No matter what you may have assumed till now, and no matter for what reason you assumed it, I have no romantic interest in you whatsoever. I never will. I expect that knowing this, you’ll put your attention elsewhere, which I understand, because that is what I intend to do.”

More Related