slide1 l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 40

Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 252 Views
  • Uploaded on

Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09. Accountability Systems. Federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Defines NCLB mandates for Title I schools failing to meet proficiency target

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09' - Gabriel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Federal and State Student Accountability Data UpdateTesting Coordinators MeetingLocal District 809/29/09

accountability systems
Accountability Systems
  • Federal
    • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
      • Defines NCLB mandates for Title I schools failing to meet proficiency target
      • Requires all students to perform at or above proficiency by 2014 in English Language Arts and Math
  • State
    • SB 1X: Public Schools Accountability Act 1999
    • Academic Performance Index

LACOE/LAUSD Fall 2009

federal testing accountability
Federal Testing Accountability

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

No Child Left Behind

federal adequate yearly progress ayp
Federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
  • Participation Rate
  • Minimum Proficiency Rates or Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)
  • Minimum Academic Performance Index (API) [680]
  • Minimum Graduation Rate [83.1% or +.1%]
  • Curricular Areas: Language Arts and Math

LACOE/LAUSD

4

cahsee proficiency
CAHSEE Proficiency
  • English Language Arts:

380 Scaled Score

    • 97% Ninth and Tenth Grade Standards
  • Mathematics:

380 Scaled Score

    • 85% 6th, 7th and Grade Standards
ayp criteria high school level annual measurable objectives amo
AYP Criteria High School Level: Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

2.Testing Proficiency (AMO):

safe harbor
Safe Harbor
  • An LEA, school, or subgroup must show a decrease in the percentage of students below proficient by 10% over the prior year to qualify for Safe Harbor

http://www.cde.ca.gov/

safe harbor option
Safe Harbor Option
  • Becomes an option to meet AYP proficiency when the gap between the new AMO and the current level of proficiency is greater than 10%

New Annual Measurable Objective (AMO)

[55.6 ELA/54.8 Math]

Gap Greater than 10%

Current Proficiency (School wide or Subgroup)

senior high school
Senior High School

Proficient equals a scale score of 380 or above

high school api participation rate
High School API Participation Rate:

85% participation rate

must be met in

California Standards Tests

(CST) Grade Level Exams:

  • ELA Grades 9,10, and 11
  • US History Grade 11
  • Life Science Grade 10
failure to meet the 85 participation rate
Failure to Meetthe 85% Participation Rate:

No

Academic Performance Index (API)

for the next school year

slide16

ELA grade level CST(9-11): 27.1%

  • Math EOC CST: 18.1%
  • Science CSTs
    • Life Science 10 grade level CST
    • EOC Grade 9-11: 22.9%
  • History CSTs
    • US History 11 grade level CST
    • EOC Grades 10-11: 13.9%
  • CAHSEE ELA : 9%
  • CAHSEE Math: 9%
calculating api

Calculating API

Key to Understanding

API Growth

academic performance index api highest possible api state api goal lowest possible api
Academic Performance Index (API)Highest Possible API/State API Goal/Lowest Possible API

LACOE/LAUSD

slide28

Academic Performance Index (API)

and

CST Performance Levels

API

API

For Academic Performance Index (API), greatest gains will occur when moving students from the lowest CST levels due to weighting factors.

LACOE/LAUSD

leakage
“LEAKAGE”

Hidden Loss of API Points

3/10/2014

LACOE/LAUSD

33

slide34

Sample API Calculation:

20 students falling from Advanced to Basic

20 students advancing from Far Below Basic to Below Basic

3/10/2014

34

Hayashida/Keith

slide37
Key to Meeting Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Generating Academic Performance Index (API):Positive Annual Gains

LACOE/LAUSD Fall 2009

37

slide38

Goal:

Advance One Testing Level Per Year

regardless of assessed level.

LACOE/LAUSD Fall 2009

local district 8 title i website

Local District 8 Title I Website

http://www.lausd.k12.ca.us/District_8/title1.htm

LACOE/LAUSD Fall 2009

slide40

Wade Hayashida,

PI Coordinator

Local District 8

wade.hayashida@lausd.net

310-354-3459

LACOE/LAUSD Fall 2009