The Role of the Critics in a Democracy

1. The Role of the Critics in a Democracy It is frequently argued that the critics' role in a successful democracy is to reveal and expose political corruption, social injustice, and economic privilege. To put it another way, critics ought to point out the flaws and issues that enable a leader or government to remain in power for so long. The Concept of Democracy in Ancient Greece During the democracy of ancient Greece, only free male citizens were eligible to vote. However, women's participation in politics was not restricted as a result. Women had access to political power because they were encouraged to relocate to the polis. The disasters or law courts were ancient Athens' most democratic institution. Several hundred non- lawyers were the members of these courts. They were tasked with settling disagreements. These courts were managed by the executive committee, or boule. From each of the ten tribes, a random selection was made for these members. The administrative committees were overseen by the boule, or executive committee. It also decided what the assembly would talk about. The discriminatory lines drawn between citizens and non-citizens in ancient Greece's democracy are frequently the subject of criticism. It did not exclude citizens based on their ethnicity, but it did enact broad laws that were discriminatory against women and enslaved people. A group of fifty men from each tribe met once a month in ancient Athens to vote on issues. After that, the assembly would make decisions regarding funding, treaties, and military mages. It was an innovative system. Direct democracies are closer to ideal democracy than representative systems It is up for debate whether a country's political system is a democracy. A country's status as a democracy is affected by a number of factors. The kind of system that is in place, how democratic the system is, and whether or not the system is working for the people are some of these factors. The country's system should be decided by the people, not outsiders.

2. The following are necessary components of a functioning democracy: a comprehensive set of institutional procedures, people's full participation, and the capacity to deliver outcomes of good governance. The political system of a nation frequently lacks these elements. Worldwide, a number of systems have been developed, but none yet possess all of these components. As a result, a nation might have to come up with a good way to combine all of these parts. Direct democracy is the most efficient method for achieving this. A political system in which citizens elect representatives to government positions is known as direct democracy. Sortition, the making of laws, and trials are also part of it. Journalists are supposed to expose economic privilege, political corruption, and social injustice. However, researchers have yet to agree on the reasons why some countries have corruption while others do not. This is despite the hype surrounding journalism and corruption. Because of this, the research on journalism and corruption is contentious. The media industry has emerged as a dominant political force in the United States. Media organizations now serve the interests of elites and party politics rather than being an independent voice. In the US, political polarization has gotten worse as a result. Corruption is prevalent in some lobbying-related practices in other nations. However, in the United States, the rally is regarded as a form of political expression that is protected by the constitution. Money politics has become an "irremovable tumor" in the United States. Because of this, there are fewer avenues for ordinary Americans to express their opinions. The exercise of power in the absence of legal authority is what is meant to be called corruption. There are many types of corruption. It can include both private and public activities. A single act of corruption may be influenced by a number of factors, including the economic structure or corporate culture. Additionally, corruption can have both large and small effects. Liberal Democracy Avoids the Tyranny of the Majority The Glorious Revolution of 1688 saw the institutionalization of liberalism in Britain. Liberal Democracy Avoids the Tyranny of the Majority The new constitution established essential civil rights and expanded the powers of the parliament.

3. However, the military and government were dominated by aristocratic elites, who possessed the most power in Europe. They controlled the judiciary and the Church. Social status and access to economic resources may be restricted by these elites. Non-democratic elites were removed from the government and other institutions during the French Revolution. The anti-democratic legacy of previous regimes was broken down as a result of the resulting reforms. This contributed to the construction of a new democratic society's infrastructure. However, numerous initial attempts at democracy were unsuccessful. These experiments' failures contributed to a broader appreciation of liberal values. In today's democracy, the tyranny of the majority has emerged as a crucial issue. When the majority imposes its will on a minority group, this is known as the tyranny of the majority. Recognizing minority groups' rights and need for protection is essential. Author Bio I am Ellie Cross, The Content Manager at this prestigious organisation, assisting students with essay writers uk, Dissertation help, and Quality custom essay writing service in the UK for a long time. Since its inception, I have been part of Research Prospect and have seen all its ups and downs in all those years. I manage a growing team of great writers and content marketers who contribute to a great extent to helping students with their academics.