School of Life Sciences
Download
1 / 17

A Systematic Review of Burro Grazing Effects on Mojave Desert Vegetation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 181 Views
  • Uploaded on

School of Life Sciences. A Systematic Review of Burro Grazing Effects on Mojave Desert Vegetation Scott R. Abella scott.abella@unlv.edu http://faculty.unlv.edu/abellas2/. Burro sightings in Lake Mead NRA, 1991-2005 1

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'A Systematic Review of Burro Grazing Effects on Mojave Desert Vegetation' - DoraAna


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

School of Life Sciences

A Systematic Review of Burro Grazing Effects on Mojave Desert Vegetation

Scott R. Abella scott.abella@unlv.edu http://faculty.unlv.edu/abellas2/


Slide2 l.jpg

Burro sightings in Lake Mead NRA, 1991-20051

Yellow lines = aerial surveys

NEVADA

ARIZONA

1Map provided by GIS division, Lake Mead NRA


Slide3 l.jpg

  • Scattered literature, contradictory

  • Need more focused conclusions than “burros have negative impacts”

  • Trivial in the sense of removal because of status as exotic species or as a domestic livestock

  • Addressing questions of past effects, precisely what has been affected and to what extent important for mgt.

Rationale


Slide4 l.jpg

  • Methods

  • Science Direct, Agricola, Biological Sciences, Google Scholar, Journal of Range Management

  • Key words: burro, feral ass, grazing, Mojave, vegetation, impact, effect

  • Douglas & Hurst (1993) annotated bibliography, Lake Mead NRA 1994 Environmental Impact Statement

  • Examined all references therein


Slide5 l.jpg

  • Criteria for Inclusion

  • Must be conducted in Mojave Desert or in adjacent transition containing Mojave species

  • Must provide some quantitative data on burro diets, forage, or effects on plants

  • Published/unpublished, but for unpublished, must be in report w/ methods

  • > 50 documents; 22 meet criteria


Slide6 l.jpg

Classification of Studies

1. Diet analysis – 9 studies

2. Utilization – 6 studies

3. Control/impact comparisons – 3 studies

4. Exclosure – 3 studies

5. Forage analysis – 6 studies


Slide7 l.jpg

Diet Analysis – 9 Studies

7/9 studies characterized > 1 year

Range 11-54 spp in diets; mean = 33



Slide9 l.jpg

Diet Analysis Plantago ovata, Bromus rubens, perennial grasses, Atriplex, Ambrosia dumosa, Sphaeralcea ambigua


Slide10 l.jpg

Preferred: Elymusmultisetus, Achnatherumhymenoides, PleuraphisjamesiiNot preferred: Artemisianova, Ephedra, Larrea tridentata, Ambrosia dumosa


Slide11 l.jpg

  • Utilization – 6 Studies

  • Disadvantages – hard to measure if plants removed entirely; no controls unless plants caged; only shrubs measured

  • Conflicting results: e.g., Ambrosia utilized in 2 studies, not in another

  • Ephedra not utilized in 3 studies

  • As expected, utilization heavy near water


Slide12 l.jpg

Exclosures – 6 Studies

2/3 studies sample only 1 exclosure

No pre-treatment data


Slide13 l.jpg

Control-Impact – 3 Studies

2/3 studies unreplicated

Match site equivalency


Slide14 l.jpg

  • Forage Analysis – 6 Studies

  • One study concludes that Plantago ovata rich in protein, P, B-carotene, and is highly digestible

  • Few studies matched forage characteristics to actual consumption, or analyzed species not expected to be good forage


Slide15 l.jpg

  • Main Conclusions

  • Replication, randomization, study/ experimental design rigor, and publication rates overall low

  • Nevertheless, several consistencies – perennial grasses and certain forbs heavily consumed; most shrubs eaten only when no other available alternatives

  • Variety of approaches useful, and to measure spatial and temporal variation


Slide16 l.jpg

  • Further Research

  • Enhance basic understanding of veg. change in absence of burro grazing

  • Measure potential longer term changes in the past

  • New emerging questions – e.g., does burro grazing interact with desert fires?

  • Useful opportunity to better understand grazing in desert ecosystems


Slide17 l.jpg

PUBLIC LANDS

School of Life Sciences

Scott R. Abella University of Nevada Las Vegas scott.abella@unlv.edu http://faculty.unlv.edu/abellas2/


ad