1 / 46

Harnessing Excess Electrical Energy From Carbon Arc Spark Gaps

Harnessing Excess Electrical Energy From Carbon Arc Spark Gaps. By William S. Alek INTALEK, INC. July 29, 2006. In January of 2006, I asked a simple question: “Is there excess electrical energy coming from spark gaps?”. My quest begins!.

Donna
Download Presentation

Harnessing Excess Electrical Energy From Carbon Arc Spark Gaps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Harnessing ExcessElectrical Energy FromCarbon Arc Spark Gaps By William S. Alek INTALEK, INC. July 29, 2006

  2. In January of 2006, I asked a simple question: “Is there excess electrical energy coming from spark gaps?” My quest begins!

  3. Jean-Louis Naudin’s Cold Fusion Reactor (CFR) Experiments ~2003 • Tungsten cathode rod. • Stainless Steel anode mesh. • Potassium Carbonate electrolyte solution. • 240V DC was applied. • Tested OVERUNITY! A COP of 1.2 (120%) was reported.

  4. Jean-Louis Naudin’s Cold Fusion Reactor (CFR) Experiments

  5. Bruce Perreault’sRadiant Energy Research ~2003

  6. Bruce Perreault’sRadiant Energy Research

  7. The Perreault Valve • The outer shell is the anode, which acts as an electron sink. • The inner core is the cathode, which acts as an electron source. • The valve is open to the air.

  8. My Replication of thePerreault Valve

  9. My Replication of thePerreault Valve

  10. Testing the Perreault Valve

  11. Testing the Perreault Valve • The Wimshurst Generator is cranked by hand. • It generates up to 75,000 Volts DC of low energy electricity. • Perfect generator for testing spark gap type devices.

  12. Testing the Perreault Valve

  13. Test Results of the Perreault Valve • The Wimshurst Generator was hand cranked for a time period of 15 seconds with and without the Perreault Valves. • All the Perreault Valves tested UNDERUNITY!

  14. So, now what? I had a web-based teleconference with Stefan Hartmann of OVERUNITY.COM from Germany. Stefan suggested replacing the steel pipe with a Carbon/Graphite gouging rod, then run the same tests. He also suggested placing these rods in series. Sounds like a plan!

  15. Jean-Louis Naudin’s Replication of the Newman Machine ~1998 • One critical key is the use of a commutator. • Commutators typically use Carbon/Graphite brushes on Copper tracks. • According to Stefan Hartmann, Newman used an array of eight brushes wired in series. • A “Bumpy surface” or broken surface is key to the effect.

  16. Testing the Carbon ArcSpark Gap

  17. Testing the Carbon ArcSpark Gap

  18. Testing the Carbon ArcSpark Gap

  19. Testing the Carbon ArcSpark Gap

  20. Test Results of theCarbon Arc Spark Gap

  21. Test Results of theCarbon Arc Spark Gap

  22. Test Results of the Carbon Arc • The Wimshurst Generator was hand cranked for a time period of 15 seconds with and without the Carbon Arcs. • All the Carbon Arcs tested OVERUNITY!

  23. Testing MultipleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps

  24. Testing MultipleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps

  25. Testing DoubleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps

  26. Test Results of DoubleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps

  27. Test Results of DoubleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps

  28. Test Results of Double Carbon Arcs • The Wimshurst Generator was hand cranked for a time period of 15 seconds with and without the Multiple Carbon Arcs. • All the double Carbon Arcs tested OVERUNITY!

  29. Test Results of TripleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps

  30. Test Results of TripleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps

  31. Test Results of MultipleCarbon Arc Spark Gaps • So, all the Multiple Carbon Arcs tested OVERUNITY. However, adding a second spark gap in series increased the COP, but adding a third spark gap decreased the previous COP. • Because the COP changes as a function of the number of spark gaps wired in series, the excess energy is therefore an electromagnetic wave phenomenon, which can add or subtract energy in a circuit.

  32. So, to answer my first question, “Is there excess electrical energy coming from spark gaps?” Yes, Carbon Arc Spark Gaps output excess energy, but why?

  33. Is Low Energy Nuclear Fusion Taking Place? • George Oshawa in March 1965 published an article in East-West Institute Magazine called “George Oshawa Transmutation Experiments” stating he produced Iron (Fe) from Carbon (C) and Oxygen (O). • The experiments were successfully replicated by other researchers using air and water.

  34. Nuclear Binding Energy – The Sum of Whole is Always Less Than the Sum of its’ Parts • It is well known in physics/chemistry that nuclei are made up of protons and neutron, but the mass of a nucleus is always less than the sum of the individual masses of the protons and neutrons which constitute it. The difference is a measure of the nuclear binding energy which holds the nucleus together.

  35. Nuclear Binding Energy – The Sum of Whole is Always Less Than the Sum of its’ Parts • Fusion occurs for masses less than Iron (Fe). • Fission occurs for masses greater than Iron (Fe). • Both nuclear fusion and fission release excess energy.

  36. Low Energy Nuclear Reactions • The original carbon contained ~ 2 ppm Fe. • The results showed large variations in Fe content (50 to 2000 ppm) in the C residue. • The Fe in the C residue was also analyzed by mass spectroscopy for the abundance of various isotopes... Besides Fe, the presence of other elements like Si, Ni, Al, and Cr was also determined in the C residue…

  37. Low Energy Nuclear Reactions • The Fe produced by this transmutation is stainless; it does not rust easily. Also, it reacts much less to heat than does ordinary Fe... All results of the transmutation for Fe have been carefully examined and analyzed by several methods, as: (1) magnetic inspection, (2) spectroscopic analysis, (3) chemical analysis, (4) examination by reagents, etc, and confirmed by authoritative testing agencies. • The new form of iron is called GOS (George Oshawa Steel).

  38. Conclusion • Carbon Arc spark gaps produce excess energy due to low energy nuclear fusion reactions. • The by-product of this type of reaction produces a high quality stainless steel. So, what’s next?

  39. SmartPAK/xPOD System

  40. SmartPAK/xPOD System • Continuously monitors battery charging performance. • Calculates and displays COP in real-time. • Uses the Freescale 68HC908AB32 Microcontroller.

  41. SmartPAK/xPOD System • Implements a double Carbon Arc spark gap for maximum COP. • Collects Iron by-product using ceramic magnets. • 18:600 turn transformer with ferrite core.

  42. SmartPAK/xPOD System

  43. Welcome to “The Ranch”,aka “DREAMLAND” • A research and development consortium of companies located in the high desert of Arizona. • Specialize with energy, gravity/antigravity, and time control. • Provide manufacturing licensing agreements. • Privately funded.

  44. Welcome to “The Ranch”,aka “DREAMLAND”

  45. Welcome to “The Ranch”,aka “DREAMLAND”

  46. Contact Information • Website: http://www.intalek.com • Email: william.alek@intalek.com • Yahoo eGroup: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intalek/

More Related