Download
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
2010 Winter Leadership Conference PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
2010 Winter Leadership Conference

2010 Winter Leadership Conference

278 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

2010 Winter Leadership Conference

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010 Winter Leadership Conference January 20-21, 2010 The Regency Conference Center O’Fallon, Illinois Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports: Coming Together to Strengthen Illinois Schools

  2. Sheri LueckingTechnical Assistance DirectorSouth Region

  3. Sheri LueckingTechnical Assistance DirectorSouth Region

  4. WELCOME!! • Approximately 600 participants • Over 80 different IL school districts Who is Here? Partners from: ARK (7), CT (6), Idaho (1), Indiana (1),MO (6), WI (5)

  5. IL District and School based leaders/implementers: • Teachers: ALL grades/subjects/areas (140) • Coaches: External and Internal (80) • Principals, Assistant Principals, Deans (75) • School-based Clinicians - SSW’s and Psychs etc (60) • Superintendents, Assistant Superintendents (10) • Special Education Directors, Supervisors etc (25) • unidentified and/or “others”… “lots” (you do the math!)

  6. Food. . . Continental Breakfast Buffet lunch 4 serving lines, tables available in all breakout rooms Wednesday – Italian Buffet Thursday – Deli Sandwich Buffet

  7. Comfort. . . • Restrooms • Located off the East Corridor in the Conference Center • Water Stations • Placed throughout the Conference Center • Breakout Sessions • While most sessions are not full, please attend those you selected

  8. Handouts...Be GREEN! • on the web atwww.pbisillinois.org • Click on link below Winter Conference picture, “download presentation materials and handouts.”

  9. Fun. . . Networking Reception 5:00 – 7:00 pm, Hotel Lobby

  10. Reminder . . . Early Start Tomorrow 7:30 am Continental Breakfast 8:00 am Plenary

  11. Upcoming Events….

  12. PBIS: Strengthening the Continuum of Supports for All Students 2010 Summer Leadership Conference Featuring: George Sugai Professor of Educational Psychology University of Connecticut Co-Director, National PBIS Center Terrance Scott Professor of Education University of Louisville August 4-5, 2010 Donald E. Stephens Convention Center, Rosemont, IL and Illinois PBIS Leaders & Implementers

  13. 2010 National PBIS Leadership Forum Expanding the Effectiveness of School-wide PBIS Implementation Save the Date: October 14-15, 2010 · Rosemont, Illinois For more information, visit www.pbis.org

  14. Maximizing your Learning • Differentiated instruction • Differentiated Learning Use a Team Approach!

  15. Framework for organizing your learning…differentiated learning… What is your implementation status? Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier3 Systems Data Practices • Building on your Current Knowledge and Skills • What do I/we already have mastery of? • What’s new information for us/me? • What’s more detailed for us/me?

  16. State of the State…

  17. 200 Schools “Recognized” • Fully Implementing Level of Recognition: 18 • Implementing Level of Recognition: 64 • Emerging Level of Recognition: 71 Recognition Applications Available at: www.pbisillinois.org

  18. Number of Illinois Schools & Districts Adopting PBIS FY99-FY10 1200 Schools 299 Districts

  19. The Growth Continues Over 1000 schools in 11 years: • 234 new schools during 2008-09 school year • Most schools ever trained in one year during the 11 years of IL PBIS • Expected to add 200 schools a year for next 3-5 years • New Schools Added (July –Dec. 2009) • 31 new districts • 119 new schools

  20. 299 233 Number of Illinois Districts Adopting PBIS & Number of External Coaches as of January 2010

  21. 2 – 4 Years Stages of Implementation • Exploration • Installation • Initial Implementation • Full Implementation • Innovation • Sustainability Implementation occurs in stages: Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005

  22. 2 – 4 Years Stages of Implementation • Exploration • Installation • Initial Implementation • Full Implementation • Innovation • Sustainability Implementation occurs in stages: Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005

  23. Innovation and Sustainability:Areas of Focus: Family/Community Partnerships • SLT participation • Trainings/Conferences • Regional Network Meetings • Ongoing sharing of information • FULL Implementation – ALL Students • Look at data broken out by ethnicity and disability • Create specific strategies to effect data trends • Tools, Strategies for Tier 2/3 • Interagency/Interconnected Systems Framework • Community-based Leadership team at District Level

  24. Seeking Status of Family Involvement: Results so Far… Family members Active on district and/or building levels: 56 Total number of family members who received follow-up correspondence from PBIS: 56 Total number of family members who have received calls from TACs and who have expressed willingness to participate in various statewide planning events for the Network: 22

  25. Seeking Status of Family Involvement: Results so Far… 22 family members were reached via phone/email by TACs Of those 22 family members, 12 expressed interest in attending SLT meetings, 13 expressed interest in attending Conferences, 14 expressed interest in regional discussion groups, and 16 expressed interest in being part of a family involvement email/communication list.

  26. ALL Students…. • Disproportionate Impact: Ethnicity • Disproportionate Impact: Disability • High Schools • Tier 2/3 Development

  27. More Schools Reviewing Discipline Data by Ethnicity

  28. Decrease in Subjective Referral Categories Alton Middle School, ACSD

  29. Reductions in OSS from 2006-07 to 2008-09 Burr Oak Elementary School, Calumet PSD

  30. Decreases in OSS2007-08 to 2008-09 J. W. Eater Jr. High School in Rantoul

  31. ODRs, OSS, and Students in CICO Over Two Years Washington Elementary School

  32. Students with IEPs Spending more than 80% of School Day in General Education Setting

  33. Students with IEPs Served in Separate Placements

  34. Improved Access to General Education for Students with IEPs Students with IEPs Spending more than 80% of Day in General Education Setting

  35. Illinois High Schools Implementing PBIS

  36. Students with Tardies Over Two Years East Aurora High School

  37. Discipline Data 2007-2009 Willowbrook High School

  38. Our Tier 2/3 Journey…. • From demos… • to replication…. • to ‘business as usual’ • Changes in Secondary and Tertiary courses • Tools integrated • Teaming structures better defined • Scheduled phone follow-up for team facilitators is automatic

  39. Replication of Tertiary Demos Moving Rapidly Phases of Implementation: Secondary Phase I(n=8 Replication Schools)

  40. Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports:A Response to Intervention (RtI) Model Tier 1/Universal School-Wide Assessment School-Wide Prevention Systems ODRs, Attendance, Tardies, Grades, DIBELS, etc. Tier 2/Secondary Tier 3/ Tertiary Check-in/ Check-out (CICO) Intervention Assessment Social/Academic Instructional Groups (SAIG) Daily Progress Report (DPR)(Behavior and Academic Goals) Group Intervention with Individualized Feature (e.g., Check and Connect -CnC and Mentoring) Competing Behavior Pathway, Functional Assessment Interview, Scatter Plots, etc. Brief Functional Behavior Assessment/ Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP) Complex or Multiple-domain FBA/BIP SIMEO Tools: HSC-T, RD-T, EI-T Wraparound Illinois PBIS Network, Revised October 2009 Adapted from T. Scott, 2004

  41. Teaming at Tier 2 Secondary Systems Planning ‘conversation’ Monitors effectiveness of CICO, S/AIG, Mentoring, and Brief FBA/BIP supports Review data in aggregate to make decisions on improvements to the interventions themselves Students are NOT discussed Problem Solving Team (‘conversation’) Develops & monitors plans for one student at a time Every school has this type of meeting Teachers and family are typically invited

  42. Teaming at Tier 3 Tertiary Systems Planning ‘conversation’ Monitors effectiveness of Complex FBA/BIP & Wraparound supports Review data in aggregate to make decisions on improvements to the interventions themselves Students are NOT discussed Individual Student Teams FBA/BIP Team per student Wraparound Team per student

  43. 3-Tiered System of Support Necessary Conversations (Teams) Universal Team Secondary Systems Team Problem Solving Team Tertiary Systems Team Uses Process data; determines overall intervention effectiveness Uses Process data; determines overall intervention effectiveness Plans SW & Class-wide supports Standing team; uses FBA/BIP process for one youth at a time Universal Support CICO Brief FBA/BIP SAIG Complex FBA/BIP WRAP Group w. individual feature Brief FBA/BIP

  44. Tier 2 Progress:Rob’s Discipline Data

  45. Student Successfully Transitions out of Special Education Placement Kendall’s Daily Point Data for Behavioral Goals

  46. System Tools Track Decreases in Special Education Placement Lovejoy Elementary School Special Education Referral/Placement by School Year

  47. Integration with mental health and other community partners

  48. Old Approach  New Approach Each school works out their own plan with Mental Health (MH) agency; A MH counselor is housed in a school building 1 day a week to “see” students; No data to decide on or monitor interventions; “Hoping” that interventions are working; but not sure. District has a plan for integrating MH at all buildings (based on community data as well as school data); MH person participates in teams at all 3 tiers; MH person leads small groups based on data MH person co-facilitates FBA/BIP or wrap individual teams for students.

  49. Welcome to Our Speakers… Karen A. Blase Michelle A. Duda National Implementation Research Network Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Barbara Sims SISEP Coordinator, Illinois State Board of Education