systematic reviews of qualitative literature l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 40

Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 532 Views
  • Uploaded on

Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature. Catherine Francis-Baldesari UK Cochrane Centre Oxford. Objectives. Discuss the purpose and characteristics of meta-synthesis. Become familiar with the concepts and general processes to conduct a meta-synthesis. What Meta-Synthesis is Not.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature' - Antony


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
systematic reviews of qualitative literature

Systematic Reviewsof Qualitative Literature

Catherine Francis-Baldesari

UK Cochrane Centre

Oxford

objectives
Objectives
  • Discuss the purpose and characteristics of meta-synthesis.
  • Become familiar with the concepts and general processes to conduct a meta-synthesis.

UK Cochrane Centre

what meta synthesis is not
What Meta-Synthesis is Not
  • Not a systematic literature review.
  • Not a collation or codifying of studies.
  • Not an aggregation or summing of outcomes.
  • Not a concept analysis.

Finfgeld, D.L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art- so far. Qualitative Health Research, 13 (7), 893-904

UK Cochrane Centre

purpose
Purpose
  • Meta-analysis– aggregating data to reach statistical power for detection of cause and effect between treatment and outcomes.
  • Meta-synthesis – integrating data to reach a new theoretical or conceptual level of understanding and development.

Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M.H., Noblit, G., Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis:

Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14 (10), 1342-1365.

,

UK Cochrane Centre

concept of integration
Concept of Integration
  • More than the sum of parts.
  • Inferences derived from findings as a whole.
  • New higher-order interpretations created.

Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, N.H., Noblit, G., Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14 (10), 1342-1365.

UK Cochrane Centre

achieving integration
Achieving Integration

Comprehensive consideration of data

  • Inclusion vs. exclusion
  • Commonalities and differences
  • Sensitivity to patterns
  • Intuitive and logical
  • Theoretical reconstruction of concepts

Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

UK Cochrane Centre

characteristics of process
Characteristics of Process
  • Inductive and interpretive in design.
  • Deconstruction and examination of findings from a sample of studies.

Mays, N., Pope, C., Popay, J. (2005). Details of approaches to synthesis: A methodological appendix to the paper. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy making in the health field. http://www.chsrf.ca/funding_opportunities/commissioned_research/ projects/pdf/msynth_appendix_e.pdf- 115.5KB

UK Cochrane Centre

slide8
Translation of studies into one another.
  • Transformation of parts into whole.
  • Development of theory to explain the range of findings encountered.

UK Cochrane Centre

how do we evaluate outputs of qualitative research
How Do We Evaluate Outputs of Qualitative Research?

Conceptual themes

Contributory

Defensible in design

Rigorous in conduct

Credible in claim

Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Dillon, L. (2003). Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, Cabinet Office, United Kingdom.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide10
Contributory…

In advancing wider knowledge or understanding about policy, practice, theory or a particular substantive field.

Defensible in design…

By providing a research strategy that can address the evaluative questions posed.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide11
Rigorous in conduct…

Through the systematic and transparent collection, analysis and interpretation of qualitative data.

Credible in claim…

Through offering well-founded and plausible arguments about the significance of the evidence generated.

UK Cochrane Centre

evaluating qualitative studies
Qualitative

Credibility

Confirmability

Transferability

Dependability

Quantitative

Internal validity

Objectivity

Generalisability

External validity

Evaluating Qualitative Studies

Malterud, K. 2001. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358, 483-488.

UK Cochrane Centre

theory and philosophy
Theory and Philosophy

"Application of nursing theory in practice depends on nurses having knowledge of the theoretical works as well as an understanding of how philosophies, models, and theories can relate to each other.“

Van Sell, S.L. & Kalofissudis, I.A. (2002). The Evolving Essence of the Science of Nursing: Complexity Integration Nursing Theory. E-Book retrieved on January 16, 2006 from http://www.nursing.gr/Complexitytheory.pdf

UK Cochrane Centre

philosophical framework
Philosophical Framework
  • Determines how reality is explained, the source of knowledge, and the perspective taken in research and practice.

Monti, E. J. & Tingen, M.S. (1999). Multiple Paradigms of Nursing Science [Nursing Theory for the 21st Century]. Advances in Nursing Science,21(4), 64-80.

UK Cochrane Centre

theoretical framework
Theoretical Framework
  • Influences how research questions are generated, studies are conducted, data are analysed, findings are understood, and results are used.

Alderson, P. (1998). Theories in health care and research: The importance of theories in health care.

BMJ, 317; 1007-1010.

UK Cochrane Centre

conceptual framework
Conceptual Framework
  • Brings theory into practice by organizing themes to form models, and operationalizing findings of synthesis.
  • Enables experience, reflection and wisdom as praxis, allowing practice to drive theory.

Warelow, P.J. (1997). A nursing journey through discursive practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 1020-1027.

UK Cochrane Centre

person centred practice with older people
Person-Centred Practice with Older People
  • Hermeneutic philosophy guided development of theoretical and conceptual framework.
  • Theoretical frameworkofauthentic consciousness.

McCormack, B. (2003). Conceptual framework for person-centred practice with older people. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9(3); 202-209.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide18
Conceptual framework of person-centrednessaddressed patient's and nurse's values within the context of a care environment.
  • Integrationof conversation analysis and reflective conversation for data collection and analysis.
  • Findings suggest nurses need to perceive the patient as an individual and articulate the mutual understanding and expectations in the relationship.

UK Cochrane Centre

why do meta synthesis
Why Do Meta-Synthesis?

Theory building

Theory explication

Theoretical development

Schreiber, R., Crooks, D.,&Stern, P. N. (1997). Qualitative meta-analysis. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Completing a qualitative project (pp 311-326). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

UK Cochrane Centre

quantitative viewpoint
Quantitative Viewpoint
  • Determine best practices.
  • Maximize outcomes with minimal expenditures.

Achieve best outcomes in the shortest amount of time at the lowest cost possible.

UK Cochrane Centre

concept of compliance newton 2004
Concept of Compliance:Newton (2004)

“At risk populations [for low rates of breastfeeding] include poorly educated, poverty-stricken, young African-American women. Unfortunately, the understanding of why these populations are noncompliant is rudimentary.”

Newton, E.R. (2004). The Epidemiology of Breastfeeding. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology,47(3):613-23.

UK Cochrane Centre

qualitative viewpoint
Qualitative Viewpoint
  • Strengthen the role of qualitative studies in health sciences research.
  • Improve applicability of qualitative research findings in clinical practice.
  • Build on a qualitative body of knowledge to inform theory, practice, research, and policy.

UK Cochrane Centre

concept of self regulation conrad 1985
Concept of Self-Regulation Conrad (1985)
  • Re-frames the medically defined problem of noncompliance.
  • Allows the modification of medication practice for asserting some clinical control over epilepsy.

Barbour, R.S. (2000). The role of qualitative research in broadening the `evidence base' for clinical practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 6 (2), 155±163.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide24
Theoretically generalizable understanding of apparently illogical behaviour in a wide range of clinical and non-clinical contexts.
  • Childhood immunizations, observance of safer sex, and daily management of asthma and diabetes.

UK Cochrane Centre

steps in meta synthesis
Steps in Meta-Synthesis

1. Getting started. Identification of intellectual interest that qualitative research might inform.

2. Deciding what is relevant to initial interests and inclusion criteria for studies.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide26
3. Reading the studies. Not a one-time event. As the synthesis develops, studies are read and reread to check relevant metaphors and interpretations.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide27
4. Determining how the studies are related. Lists of key metaphors, phrases, ideas, or concepts and their relationships from each study and juxtaposed with those of other studies.

This phase is complete when an initial assumption about the relationship between studies can be made.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide28
5. Translation. Treating accounts in studies as analogies.

Translation maintains central metaphors and concepts in each study related to other metaphors or concepts in the same study.

Compares them to relevant metaphors and concepts from other studies in the form of analogy.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide29
6. Synthesizing translations.

Translations compared to determine if some metaphors and concepts encompass those from other studies.

If so, another level of synthesis is possible: analyzing competing interpretations and translating them into each other.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide30
7. Expressing the synthesis.

Meta ethnography must be translated into the language of intended audiences.

Clarity and transparency.

Concise and straightforward.

Noblit, G.W. & Hare, R.D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

UK Cochrane Centre

metasummary
Metasummary
  • Extraction of findings from all studies in review.
  • Generation of comprehensive inventory of findings across studies.
  • Findings reduced to parsimonious list.
  • Frequency effect sizes calculated.

Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2003). Creating Metasummaries of Qualitative Findings. Nursing Research, 52(4), 226-233.

UK Cochrane Centre

analysis
Analysis
  • Content analysis from meta findings used to identify patterns and themes common across studies.
  • Constant comparison analysis clarifies distinct, shared meanings.
  • Empirical results become foundation for metasynthesis.

UK Cochrane Centre

meta ethnography
Meta-Ethnography
  • Critical thinking and conceptual analysis occur simultaneously with insight, creativity and intuition.
  • Analogies and metaphors formed during interpretation become new knowledge and understanding.
  • Dynamic and “real time” self-awareness of the synthesis process is essential.

UK Cochrane Centre

types of meta ethnography
Types of Meta-Ethnography

Reciprocal

Refutational

Line of argument

UK Cochrane Centre

reciprocal
Reciprocal
  • Translations directly comparable.
  • Iterative process – studies translated into each other.
  • Metaphors, themes, concepts, and organizers translated across studies.

UK Cochrane Centre

refutational
Refutational
  • Interpretation designed to argue against another interpretation.
  • Explanation not of findings but significance of findings.
  • Exhibits beliefs and ways of arguing.
  • Promotes individual reflexivity.
  • Enriches critical discourse.

UK Cochrane Centre

line of argument
Line of Argument
  • Concerned with clinical inference and grounded theorizing.
  • Construction of an interpretation.
  • Involves two steps –
    • translation of studies into one another
    • development of grounded theory, putting similarities and differences between studies into an interpretive order

UK Cochrane Centre

summary
Summary
  • Meta-synthesis is needed to build on the qualitative body of literature in healthcare.
  • Different philosophical and theoretical approaches result in different designs, analysis, and results.
  • Diversity in approaches to meta-synthesis is important for enlarging discourse.

UK Cochrane Centre

slide39
Generalization of theory across clinical situations and relationships is critical.
  • Bringing theory to practice, and practice to theory is possible.
  • Nursing is uniquely situated to pursue this methodological paradigm.

UK Cochrane Centre

questions
Questions?

UK Cochrane Centre