The impact of terrorism on political attitudes a two edged sword
1 / 31

The Impact of Terrorism on Political Attitudes: A Two-Edged Sword - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

The Impact of Terrorism on Political Attitudes: A Two-Edged Sword. Ami Pedahzur & Daphna Canetti-Nisim. Goals of Terrorism. 2 ‘schools’: Terrorists wishes to terrorize the public and change its political attitudes

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'The Impact of Terrorism on Political Attitudes: A Two-Edged Sword' - Anita

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
The impact of terrorism on political attitudes a two edged sword l.jpg

The Impact of Terrorism on Political Attitudes: A Two-Edged Sword

Ami Pedahzur & Daphna Canetti-Nisim

Goals of terrorism l.jpg
Goals of Terrorism Sword

  • 2 ‘schools’:

  • Terrorists wishes to terrorize the public and change its political attitudes

  • Intimidation and induction of fear are not the ends of terrorist activity but rather means to effect political change

    Q: Do they success in attaining their goals?

Research goals l.jpg
Research goals Sword

  • Looking at the relationships between:

  • Terrorism >> fear of terrorism

  • Terrorism >> militant attitudes

  • Terrorism * Fear of terrorism >> militant attitudes

Public opinion in israel terrorism and peace making l.jpg
Public Opinion in Israel: Terrorism and Peace Making Sword

  • 1967-pre-Oslo: Israelis demand strong measures against terrorists, and do not wish to seat to the negotiation table.

  • The Oslo decade – Al Aksa intifada: a militant public + willingness for peace talks.

  • Al Aksa intifada: going back to the pre-Oslo days – a militant public who rejects any possible concessions

Terrorism characteristics l.jpg
Terrorism Characteristics Sword

  • Violent acts or the threat to use violence

  • Political context or goal

  • Violence has a symbolic/deterrence dimension beyond the instrumental dimension

Some implications of terrorism l.jpg
Some Implications of Terrorism Sword

  • Emotions of fear, anxiety, hysteria

  • Uncertainty as a result of the irrational character of terrorism and the randomization of its victims

  • Frustration and inability to function because of luck of clarity in regards to the goals of terrorism and available mechanisms of coping

  • The individual’s coping with continuous & intensive terrorism usually leads to an ongoing mental pressure

Victims of terrorism in israel l.jpg
Victims of Terrorism in Israel Sword

1. Low socio-economic status:

  • The “bold and the beautiful” can better protect themselves

  • Goals of terrorist attacks are public places (e.g. markets; public transportation)

    2. Younger people/teenagers:

    They constitute a large percentage of those who use public transportation/coffee shops/dancing clubs

    3. Those who live along the “seam line”:

    They are an attractive target to terrorism perpetrators due to their geographic location

Slide8 l.jpg
Fear Sword

  • It was originated in the 12th Century. It means sudden danger. It is a sudden, unpleasant, and strong emotion which is caused by expectance or awareness to danger

  • Most researchers agree that it is a threatening and unpleasant emotion which appears as a reaction to danger

  • Fear is not the enemy but the friend of humans – it is “the red light” which helps in the process of survival

  • It allows humans to react to dangers in their environment

  • "Fear is an uneasiness of the mind, upon the thought of future danger likely to befall us." Locke.

  • "Where no hope is left, is left no fear." Milton.

Terrorists and fear of terrorism l.jpg
Terrorists and Fear of Terrorism Sword

  • Anxiety, hysteria, and fear are major ‘tools’ of terrorists in their war on political goals

  • The central assumption of the terrorists is that the creation of an anarchic atmosphere, anxiety, and uncertainty, would serve as a pressure instrument on policy makers to accept the demands of terrorists

  • Terrorism within the Israeli-Palestinian context was mainly afflicted towards civilian population, and to a limited extent towards military and particular political targets

Fearful individuals would present l.jpg
Fearful Individuals would Present: Sword

  • A general impatience towards ‘others’, and the tendency to ignore basic civil rights

  • A decrease in the efficiency of cognitive processes >>> irrational thinking and reliance on stereotypes

  • Greater willingness to take risks

  • Aggressive and militant reactions

Framework of analysis l.jpg

Militant Sword



towards the




of casualties


of terrorist


Personal fear

National fear

Framework of Analysis

Terrorism intensity

Fear of Terrorism

Political attitudes

Data sources l.jpg
Data Sources Sword

2 databases:

1. Terrorism database of the NSSC

Review of the “Ha’aretz” 1948 - 2002.

Data collection through questionnaires

regarding each terrorist incident.

A total of 2434 acts of terrorism

2. Semi-annual surveys of the NSSC

More than 2000 respondents in each survey (5 surveys so far)

Regular attitudinal Qs - To what extent do you agree with…

A total of 10,000 respondents

Indices intensity of terrorism l.jpg
Indices: Intensity of Terrorism Sword

  • Monthly casualties (deaths & injuries)

    2. Monthly terrorist attacks (suicide & non-suicide)

Indices fear questions l.jpg
Indices: Fear Questions Sword

1. National Fear

  • Fear of terrorism within Israel that would startle the political system

  • Fear of terrorism as a strategic danger to Israel

    2. Personal Fear

  • Fear of terrorism that effects daily life in Israel

  • Fear of terrorism that would injure me and my family

Indices militancy l.jpg
Indices: Militancy Sword

  • WMD should be a major component in Israeli national security

  • Every military action Israel initiates is justified

  • All means are justified in Israel’s struggle against terrorism

  • In case of a missile attack, Israel is obliged to react in full power

Findings l.jpg

Findings Sword

Moving sum x x 1 x 2 of terrorism s casualties l.jpg
Moving Sum ( SwordX, X-1, X-2) of Terrorism’s Casualties

Moving sum x x 1 x 2 of suicide terrorist attacks l.jpg
Moving Sum ( SwordX, X-1, X-2) of Suicide Terrorist Attacks

Differences in militancy between fearful and fearless l.jpg
Differences in Militancy between ‘Fearful’ and ‘Fearless’

  • The lines flow differently: fearful and fearless present decrease in militancy from t1 to t2. Fearful present a major increase in t3 whereas fearless present an increase only in t4. From t3 they present opposite trends: fearful reduce militancy, whereas fearless increase militancy.

  • In general fearful are militant in levels 75.4-79.4 whereas fearless are militant in levels 55.4-62.2

  • Greatest differences were found in October 2001: 79.4-55.4=24

  • T test showed that the differences in all points of time were significant

All means are justified in the struggle against terrorism l.jpg
All Means are Justified in the Struggle against Terrorism ‘Fearful’ & ‘Fearless’

  • Fearful individuals wish to use more force in the struggle against terrorism

  • Differences between the 2 groups were found to be significant in all 5 points

  • The most significant difference was in October 2001

Terrorism fear of terrorism and militancy l.jpg
Terrorism, Fear of Terrorism and Militancy ‘Fearful’ & ‘Fearless’

Summary conclusions l.jpg
Summary & Conclusions ‘Fearful’ & ‘Fearless’

  • Is terrorism a two-edged sword?

  • Terrorism has 2 major effects: one emotional and one attitudinal

  • Terrorism generates fear which leads to changes in political attitudes, however, the changes are not in the desired direction

Summary conclusions29 l.jpg
Summary & Conclusions ‘Fearful’ & ‘Fearless’

  • We could see a general increase in levels of terrorism with a pick in April 2002

  • Suicide attacks are the major cause of casualties – both attacks & casualties at their pick in April 2002

  • The highest rate of national fear was in October 2001, whereas the highest rate of personal fear was in April 2002

  • Militancy is similar in its nature to national fear – a decrease in April 2001 and a strong increase in October 2001

Summary conclusions30 l.jpg
Summary & Conclusions ‘Fearful’ & ‘Fearless’

  • As opposed to some assumptions on curvilinear relationships, all correlations between terrorism variables and militancy are linear – they co-vary

  • Terrorism & fear: a relationship between suicide attacks and fear in general, and in particular personal fear

  • Fear and militancy: a relationship between national fear and militancy

  • The ‘fearful’ are more militant than the ‘fearless’, however, the differences are much more significant

Summary conclusions31 l.jpg
Summary & Conclusions ‘Fearful’ & ‘Fearless’

  • As for the question of terrorism, fear of terrorism, and militancy –

  • Assuming terrorists wish to inflict fear in order to change political attitudes in a certain direction, do they manage to do so? No - during times of terrorism, the public intimidated

  • A proposed model:

  • Suicide terrorism >> personal fear >> national fear >> militant attitudes