1 / 54

Multicast

Multicast. Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University Fall 2003. Overview. IP multicast service models any source, source-specific multicast, … Multicast protocol components address assignment local group management intra- and inter-domain routing

Albert_Lan
Download Presentation

Multicast

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Multicast Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University Fall 2003

  2. Overview • IP multicast service models • any source, source-specific multicast, … • Multicast protocol components • address assignment • local group management • intra- and inter-domain routing • Programming IP multicast applications

  3. Multicast service models • Basic idea: same data needs to reach multiple receivers  avoid transmitting it once for each receiver • particularly useful if access link has bandwidth limitations • can be implemented at link, network and application layer • e.g., mailing list as example • Variations: reach unknown destination by membership (“foo server”) rather than address  also anycast

  4. *Cast • Broadcast = all nodes on (small, local) network • Directed broadcast = copies to all hosts on remote network • DDOS  not supported any more (RFC 2644) • Multicast = copies to >= 1 hosts (group) • Anycast = packet to 1 of N hosts

  5. Diversion: Anycast • RFC 1546 (“Host Anycasting Service”) • RFC 2373 (“IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture”) • “locate a host which supports a particular service but, if several servers support the service, does not particularly care which server is used.” • Example uses: • DNS root servers (F.root-servers.net = 192.5.5.241 ); see http://www.isc.org • root servers are hard-configured in DNS resolvers • 272 million queries a day • all access routers providing Internet service • Anycast  deliver to single host • special form of unicast routing • deliver to nearest host (by routing metric) • Multicast  deliver to >= 1 host (and maybe get answers from > 1 host)

  6. Anycast routing • Assign same address within subnet • supernet is advertised either globally (“global nodes”) or locally (“local nodes”) • advertise whole prefix, not just single address  avoid route filtering • BGP automatically ensures routing to closest local or global node • Distributes (or localizes) denial-of-service traffic • Does not scale well due to address usage (unless all services within the same subnet)

  7. Multicast applications • audio-video distribution (1-to-many) • audio-video conferences (all-to-all) • distributed simulation (war gaming, multi-player Doom, …) • resource discovery (where’s the next time server?) • instances of resource identified by multicast address • file distribution (stock market quotes, new software releases, OS patches, …) • network news (Usenet)

  8. Multicast trees • spanning tree ≡ tree that connects all vertices • vertices = hosts and routers • shared tree = single tree for all sources S • minimum cost spanning tree (MST) • minimum-weight tree in a weighted graph which contains all of the graph's vertices • cost = hops, delay, transmission cost ($), … • does not minimize length of S to individual destination • all traffic concentrated on tree  reservation failure • per-source tree • build independently for each source

  9. Multicast trees – Steiner trees • “given a weighted graph in which a subset of vertices are identified as terminals, find a minimum-weight connected subgraph that includes all the terminals” • Differs from MST in that Steiner vertices must be identified • NP-complete problem (see traveling salesman) • unstable: small additions to graph  large changes in traffic flows

  10. Finding MST via Prim’s algorithm • centralized, finds MST for G = (V,E) • U: set of vertices connected, start with one • add lowest-cost edge (u,v) with u U and v in V – U • tree T  T  (u,v) • U  U  v

  11. Connection-oriented multicast • enumerate sources explicitly  source-based tree • examples: • ATM: explicitly add each end point to tree • ST-II (IPv5): enumerate end points in setup message • End nodes can also attach themselves to tree • only connection-oriented  enumeration only in setup message • source needs to know destinations • resource discovery not possible • dynamic groups difficult • but: natural transition from 2-party to N-party • same routing algorithm

  12. Host group model • Multicast service model • S. Deering, 1991 (RFC 1112) • senders need not be members • groups may have any number of members • there are no topological restrictions on group membership • membership is dynamic and autonomous • host groups may be dynamic or permanent •  receiver-driven model • “subscriptions”

  13. Local multicast • Some local networks are by (original) nature multicast or broadcast: • Ethernet: original coax contention (CDMA), 802.11 wireless • need to emulate in Ethernet switches • token ring • FDDI • wireless links (BlueTooth, cellular), powerline networks • Ethernet, token ring: • broadcast: all-1 address • multicast: 01.xx.xx.xx.xx.xx • adapter hardware can filter dynamic list of addresses • ATM: point-to-point links  ATM multicast server or replication in switches

  14. IP multicast: model & addresses • host-group model • network level: data packets remain same, only address changes • need help from routers to replicate and route • special IP addresses (class D): 224.0.0.0 through 239.255.255.255 (224/4) • 28 bits  268 million groups • in addition, scoping • 224.0.0.x: local network only • 224.0.0.1: all hosts • 224.0.0.2: all routers • 224.0.1.x: internetwork control block • 224.0.2.0-224.0.255.0: ad-hoc • 224.2.0.0-224.2.255.255: SDP/SAP block • some pre-assigned by IANA • map into Ethernet: 01.00.5E.00.00.00 + lower 23 bits

  15. IP multicast scope • Avoid accidental distribution to whole Internet • IP TTL value: 0 = host, 1 = network • Others to reach larger groups • but “split horizon problem” (RFC 2907) • pruning (see later) may fail: larger TTL later • Administrative scoping (RFC 2365) • 239.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255 • RFC 1884 for IPv6 (16 scopes) • link-local scope • IPv4 local scope • organization local scope • global scope • relative addresses (from top) for common applications within scope

  16. IP multicast protocols • tree construction protocol  PIM-SM, PIM-DM • advertise reverse paths towards sources  Multiprotocol Border Gateway Protocol (MBGP) • disseminate information about sources  Multicast Source Discovery Protocol (MSDP) • hosts dynamically join and leave multicast groups  Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) • IGMPv2: specify host group

  17. Multicast model problems • Host group model now known as Any Source Multicast (ASM) • variant: source-filtered multicast (SFM) • hosts can request data for group G only for specific set of sources • or exclude list of sources •  IGMPv3 for IPv4 and MLD (listener discovery) for IPv6 • host of problems have prevented large-scale deployment: • attacks against multicast groups by unauthorized transmitters • deployment complexity • problems of allocating scarce global class-D IP addresses • lack of inter-domain scalability • single point-of-failure problems K. Almeroth, S. Bhattacharyya, C. Diot, “Challenges of Integrating ASM and SSM IP Multicast Protocol Architectures”

  18. Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) • receiving host explicitly specifies the address of the source it wants to receive from • in addition to multicast group • support one-to-many multicast • address range 232/8, ff2x:: and ff3x:: • IGMPv3: allow source specification • remove complexity from network layer  application layer (where needed)

  19. SSM, cont’d. • distribution tree for channel (S,G) rooted at S • no shared tree infrastructure • no need for MSDP • only a single source can transmit • avoid access control problem • avoid forwarding unwanted data (cf. SFM) • addresses local to each source  no global address allocation needed • for large groups, often single source • or dominated by single source

  20. Xcast • “providing for many groups of small conferences (a small number of widely dispersed people) with global topological scope scales badly given the current multicast model” (IAB workshop report) • Large number of small groups: • three-party calls • small interactive conferences • networked games •  explicitly enumerate addresses in IP header • each router looks up all addresses • group by interface • remote addresses that don’t apply (why?)

  21. Xcast • Thus, sender-driven model • Advantages: • no session setup needed • no address allocation • known set of destinations: simplifies accounting, access control

  22. RPF – Reverse path forwarding • Normal (unicast) routing: look up destination address in routing table • forward to listed outgoing interface • RPF: look up source address in IP routing table • only forward if packet arrived on that interface • strictly correct only for symmetric routes Cisco IP multicast technology overview

  23. PIM-DM • Uses unicast routing protocols (unlike DVMRP) • push model  send traffic everywhere • non-receivers prune • time out after 3 minutes • only source trees • good for networks where most subnets want traffic

  24. PIM-SM • pull model • join only (G,*) • initially, shared tree = rendezvous point (RP) • router closest to receiver registers with RP • sources register with RP and then initially send data via the shared tree • edge routers can force a source tree by sending (S,G) messages towards the source if distance to source is smaller than distance to RP • see draft-ietf-pim-v2-dm Cisco IP multicast technology overview

  25. Link Data Control A B G C D F H E I Dense Mode PIM Example Source Receiver 1 Receiver 2 following slides by Salmani

  26. A B G C D F H E I Dense Mode PIM Example Source Initial Flood of Dataand Creation of State Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  27. A B G C D F H E I Dense Mode PIM Example Source Prune to Non-RPF Neighbor Prune Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  28. A B G C D F H E I Dense Mode PIM Example Source C and D Assert to DetermineForwarder for the LAN, C Wins Asserts Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  29. A B G C D F H E I Dense Mode PIM Example Source I Gets Pruned E’s Prune is Ignored G’s Prune is Overridden Prune Join Override Prune Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  30. A B G C D F H E I Dense Mode PIM Example Source New Receiver, I Sends Graft Graft Receiver 1 Receiver 2 Receiver 3

  31. A B G C D F H E I Dense Mode PIM Example Source Receiver 1 Receiver 2 Receiver 3

  32. Link Data Control Sparse Mode PIM Example Source A B D RP C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  33. Sparse Mode PIM Example Receiver 1 Joins Group GC Creates (*, G) State, Sends(*, G) Join to the RP Source A B D RP Join C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  34. Sparse Mode PIM Example RP Creates (*, G) State Source A B D RP C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  35. Sparse Mode PIM Example Source Sends DataA Sender Registers to the RP Source Register A B D RP C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  36. Sparse Mode PIM Example RP de-encapsulates RegistersForwards Data Down the Shared TreeSends Joins Towards the Source Source Join Join A B D RP C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  37. Sparse Mode PIM Example RP Sends Register-Stop OnceData Arrives Natively Source Register-Stop A B D RP C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  38. Sparse Mode PIM Example C Sends (S, G) Joins to Join theShortest Path (SPT) Tree Source A B D RP (S, G) Join C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  39. Sparse Mode PIM Example When C Receives Data Natively,It Sends Prunes Up the RP tree forthe Source. RP Deletes (S, G) OIF andSends Prune Towards the Source Source (S, G) Prune A B D RP (S, G) RP Bit Prune C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  40. Sparse Mode PIM Example New Receiver 2 JoinsE Creates State and Sends (*, G) Join Source A B D RP (*, G) Join C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  41. Sparse Mode PIM Example C Adds Link Towards E to the OIFList of Both (*, G) and (S, G)Data from Source Arrives at E Source A B D RP C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  42. Sparse Mode PIM Example New Source Starts SendingD Sends Registers, RP Sends JoinsRP Forwards Data to Receiversthrough Shared Tree Source Register Source 2 A B D RP C E Receiver 1 Receiver 2

  43. MBGP (Multiprotocol BGP) • RFC 2283 (Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4) • RPF check for AS • path attributes MP_REACH_NLRI and MP_UNREACH_NLRI  two sets of routing information  non-congruent unicast and multicast topologies

  44. MSDP (Multicast source discovery protocol) • Scaling  different RPs for each AS  several PIM-SM domains • each RP only knows local sources and receivers • RPs share source information via MSDP • TCP session mesh • first message from new source sent to other RPs via Source Active (SA) MSDP message

  45. MSDP, cont’d. • If receiving router has (*,G) state, it joins other RP and creates (S,G) state • Encapsulated data sent down “remote” RP shared tree • Last-hop router may join shortest path to source directly • MSDP is complex and effectively broadcasts to every RP in the Internet • DOS attack by sending out flood of source announcements • Doesn’t scale for large number of sources  SA flood topology & carry data

  46. Multicast address allocation • two different sessions may pick same class-D address and interfere with each other • solutions: • dynamic allocation  SAP (later), but doesn’t fit all applications, scaling problems • explicit request  MALLOC • static delegation  GLOP • interim solution: GLOP (RFC 2770) divides IPv4 multicast address space by AS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 233 | 16 bits AS | local bits | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

  47. IPv6 multicast address allocation • RFC 3306 (“Unicast-Prefix-based IPv6 Multicast Addresses”) • Like GLOP, unicast prefix based | 8 | 4 | 4 | 112 | +--------+----+----+---------------------------------------------+ |11111111|flgs|scop| group ID | +--------+----+----+---------------------------------------------+ | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 64 | 32 | +--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+ |11111111|0011|scop|reserved| plen | network prefix | group ID | +--------+----+----+--------+--------+----------------+----------+ see RFC 3307: permanent: e.g., 0x40404040 for NTP length of network prefix

  48. Multicast address allocation • RFC 2908 (“Internet Multicast Address Allocation Architecture”) • Instance of global identifier allocation problem: • hierarchical blocks (IEEE EUI, DNS, IP addresses, phone numbers, SSN, …) • local mechanism left unspecified • on-demand • centralized server (e.g., DHCP within domain) • distributed pools • usually, combination of both • Two qualifiers: • scope (possibly global) • lifetime (possibly indefinite)

  49. Multicast address allocation • core requirements: • robustness: work even if remote parts of the networks don’t • timeliness: seconds • low probability of clashes • avoid fragmentation overhead • unfortunately, can’t have all of them • e.g., reliability  fragmentation to “warehouse” addresses or collisions

  50. Multicast address allocation MASC prefix coordinator prefix coordinator Layer 3 or GLOP prefix coordinator MAAS MAAS Layer 2 intra-domain coordination Layer 1 MADCAP HTTP domain (AS)

More Related