Complex Hazards, Technological Futures and Risk Chris Groves ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS) www.brass.cf.ac.uk email@example.com Complex technologies May have unknown causal impacts, e.g. nanotechnology
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
May have unknown causal impacts, e.g. nanotechnology
May involve many different social, economic and political dimensions in their management
1 Krohn, W. and J. Weyer (1994). Society as a laboratory: the social risks of experimental research. Science and Public Policy 21(3): 173-83.
2 Adam, B. and C. Groves (2007). Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics, Leiden, Brill, pp. 115-17.
3 Marris, P. (1996). The politics of uncertainty: attachment in private and public life, London; New York, Routledge.
4 Wynne, B. (2001). Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture 10(4): 445-81,
5 McAuslan, P. (1980), The Ideologies of Planning Law, Oxford, Pergamon Press.
6 Macintyre, A. (1981). After virtue: a study in moral theory, London: Duckworth.
5 Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, p. 233.
6 Marris, P. (1996). The politics of uncertainty: attachment in private and public life, London; New York, Routledge, pp. 88-91.
7 Sunstein, C. (2005), The Laws of Fear, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
8 e.g. Cranor, C. F. (2007). Towards a non-consequentialist approach to acceptable risks. In: Risk: philosophical perspectives, ed. T. Lewens, London, Routledge: 36-53.
9 Hansson, S. O. (2007). Risk and ethics: three approaches. Risk: philosophical perspectives. T. Lewens. London; New York, Routledge: 21-35.