90 likes | 106 Views
So how do we use this concept of thinking to understand how we perceive political issues?<br><br>In a rigid way of thinking, people judge past events as either successes or failures. They attribute the results to either good or bad influences. When planning a strategy, they try to eliminate what they think is terrible and emphasize what is good so as not to fail in the future. It involves believing that a group is excellent and others are wrong and trying to eliminate or marginalize the so-called bad. <br><br>Policy decisions can be viewed as successes or failures, and successful decisions are retained, a
E N D
So how do we use this concept of thinking to understand how we perceive political issues?
In a rigid way of thinking, people judge past events as either successes or failures. They attribute the results to either good or bad influences. When planning a strategy, they try to eliminate what they think is terrible and emphasize what is good so as not to fail in the future. It involves believing that a group is excellent and others are wrong and trying to eliminate or marginalize the so- called bad.
Policy decisions can be viewed as successes or failures, and successful decisions are retained, and We want to eliminate so-called shortcomings. Complex problems can also be avoided because they seem like unsolvable problems that increase the risk of loss. Those with a calm mindset may wish to return to a time when things were simpler and easier to succeed. Wajid khan Mp mentioned New information could be threatening even to those with stereotypes. Especially if you think you should already know. They may feel stupid because they
So how can we use this concept of thinking to understand how we perceive political issues? Either failure judges it. They attribute the results to either good or bad influences. When planning a strategy, they try to eliminate what they think is terrible and emphasize what is good so as not to fail in the future. It involves believing that they are good and that other groups are wrong and trying to eliminate or marginalize so-called bad groups. We can see policy decisions as successes or failures, and we want to keep the achievements and eliminate the so-called failures.
Complex problems can also be avoided because they seem like unsolvable problems that increase the risk of loss. Those with a calm mindset may wish to return to a time when things were simpler and easier to succeed. New information can be threatening even to those with stereotypes. Especially if you think you should already know. They may feel stupid because they don't know yet.
In the growth mindset, people see situations, problems, etc., as opportunities to learn, expand, and grow. All information is good information as it allows you to learn more. The past is seen not in terms of successes and failures but as a series of valuable learning experiences. The current challenge is seen as a learning opportunity rather than a situation where you must prove yourself by succeeding and avoiding failure. A growth mindset is future-oriented, using the past as a constant source of learning and improvement rather than using it to assess one's skills and talents.
They recognize that nothing will change and that the success of others does not threaten them. They don't mind their mistakes. They learn from them. You are more inspired than intimidated by the success of others. People with a growth mentality need to be more focused on performance (or how they look to others); they spend their time and energy learning and developing new solutions to problems. You accept challenges and persevere in the face of setbacks. They see change as an inevitable part of the growth process.
Fusion of two political views Wajid khan explains two mindsets below; 1. Fixed political views Viewing past experiences as either successes or failures Viewing situations, problems, and people as good or bad Solutions are reasonable Reinforce and eliminate the bad New information whose acceptability is limited by fear of failure
Clarity: Six Questions to Test Your Political Thinking Ability 1. When faced with cultural differences, do you find them exciting or threatening? 2. Are you curious or cautious when meeting different people? 3. When you think about big problems, do you avoid them or stubbornly deal with them? 4. Are you interested in what others think of your opinion or gathering more facts to support your argument?