1 / 64

The environment of star formation Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars

High-mass stars from cradle to first steps: a possible evolutionary sequence ( High-mass  M * >10M ⊙  L * >10 4 L ⊙  B3-O ). The environment of star formation Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars The birthplaces of high-mass stars Evolutionary scheme for high-mass stars

zwi
Download Presentation

The environment of star formation Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High-mass stars from cradle to first steps: a possible evolutionary sequence (High-mass  M*>10M⊙ L*>104L⊙ B3-O) • Theenvironmentof star formation • Theory: low-mass versus high-mass stars • The birthplaces of high-mass stars • Evolutionary scheme for high-mass stars • Conclusion: formation by accretion?

  2. The environment of star formation • Clouds: 10100 pc; 10 K; 10103 cm-3; Av=110; CO,13CO; nCO/nH2=10-4 • Clumps: 1 pc; 50 K; 105 cm-3; AV=100; CS, C34S; nCS/nH2=10-8 • Cores: 0.1 pc; 100 K; 107 cm-3; Av=1000; CH3CN, exotic species; nCH3CN/nH2=10-10 • YSOs signposts: IRAS, masers, UC HIIs

  3. Low-mass VS High-mass “Standard” (Shu’s) picture: Accretion onto protostar Static envelope: nR-2 Infalling region: nR-3/2 Protostar: tKH=GM2/R*L* Accretion: tacc=(dMacc/dt)/M* • Low-mass stars: tKH > tacc • High-mass stars: tKH < tacc  High-mass stars reach ZAMS still accreting 

  4. Low-mass VS High-mass • “Standard” (Shu’s) picture: • Accretion onto protostar • Static envelope: nR-2 • Infalling region: nR-3/2 • Protostar: tKH=GM2/R*L* • Accretion: tacc=(dMacc/dt)/M* • Low-mass stars: tKH > tacc • High-mass stars: tKH < tacc •  High-mass stars reach ZAMS still accreting 

  5. Problem: • Stellar winds + radiation pressure stop accretion at M*=8 M⊙ how can M*>8 M⊙ form? • Solutions: • Accretion with dM/dt(High-M*)>>dM/dt(Low-M*)=10-5 M⊙/y • Accretion throughdisks (+outflows) • Merging of many low-mass stars Observations of the natal environment of high-mass stars are necessary to solve this problem!

  6. The search for high-mass YSOs High-mass YSOs deeply embedded  observations more difficult than for low-mass YSOs (e.g. S254/7 SFR) Observational problem: to find suitable tracer and target 1) What to look for? High-density, high-temper. tracers  high-excitation lines, rare molecules, (sub)mm continuum 2) Where to search for? Young and massive targets: • UC HIIs: OB stars are in clusters • H2O masers without free-free: luminous but without UC HII region • IRAS without H2O and UC HII: protostellar phase?

  7. The search for high-mass YSOs • High-mass YSOs deeply embedded  observations more difficult than for low-mass YSOs (e.g. S254/7 SFR) • Observational problem: to find suitable tracer and target • 1)What to look for? High-density, high-temper. tracers  high-excitation lines, rare molecules, (sub)mm continuum • 2)Where to search for? Young and massive targets: • UC HIIs: OB stars are in clusters • H2O masers without free-free: luminous but without UC HII region • IRAS without H2O and UC HII: protostellar phase?

  8. Observations High-mass YSOs: AV > 10 radioNIR needed • Low angular resolution = single-dish = 10”2’ Effelsberg, Nobeyama, IRAM, JCMT, CSO, NRAO NH3, CO, 13CO, CS, C34S, CH3C2H, CN, HCO+, … • High angular resolution = interferometers = 0.3”4” VLA, IRAM, Nobeyama, OVRO, BIMA, VLBI NH3, CH3CN, CH3OH, SiO, HCO+, H2O, continuum

  9. General results • Targets surrounded by dense, medium size clumps: 1 pc, 50 K, 105–106 cm-3, 103–104 M⊙ • Dense, small cores found close to/around targets: 0.1 pc, >107 cm-3, 40–200 K, 10–103 M⊙

  10. Clumps Traced by all molecules observed  real entities! • Mclump>Mvirial  large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium • TKR-0.5 heated by source close to centre • nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable • dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y  large accretion rates • clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) • accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

  11. Clumps • Traced by all molecules observed real entities! • Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium • TKR-0.5 heated by source close to centre • nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable • dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y  large accretion rates • clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) • accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

  12. Clumps • Traced by all molecules observed  real entities! • Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium • TKR-0.5 heated by source close to centre • nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable • dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y  large accretion rates • clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) • accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

  13. Clumps • Traced by all molecules observed  real entities! • Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium • TKR-0.5 heated by source close to centre • nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable • dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD = 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y  large accretion rates • clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) • accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

  14. Clumps • Traced by all molecules observed  real entities! • Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium • TKR-0.5 heated by source close to centre • nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable • dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD= 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y  large accretion rates • clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) • accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

  15. Clumps • Traced by all molecules observed  real entities! • Mclump>Mvirial large B (1mG) needed for equilibrium • TKR-0.5 heated by source close to centre • nH2 R-2.6 marginally stable • dMacc/dt = Mclump/tAD= 10-3–10-2 M⊙/y  large accretion rates • clumps may be marginally stable entities (∼105 y) • accretion from clumps feeds embedded YSOs

  16. Hot Cores (HCs) Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs: • H2O masers and high energy lines  large nH2 and TK • many rare molecules  evaporation from dust grains • TKR-3/4  inner energy source • LIRAS  104 L⊙  embedded OB star • a few HCs contain UC HIIs!  OB stars • rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs • molecular outflows from several HCs  HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

  17. Hot Cores (HCs) • Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs: • H2Omasers and high energy lines large nH2 and TK • many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains • TKR-3/4  inner energy source • LIRAS  104 L⊙  embedded OB star • a few HCs contain UC HIIs!  OB stars • rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs • molecular outflows from several HCs •  HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

  18. Hot Cores (HCs) • Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs: • H2Omasers and high energy lines large nH2 and TK • many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains • TKR-3/4  inner energy source • LIRAS  104 L⊙  embedded OB star • a few HCs contain UC HIIs!  OB stars • rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs • molecular outflows from several HCs •  HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

  19. Hot Cores (HCs) • Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs: • H2Omasers and high energy lines large nH2 and TK • many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains • TKR-3/4  inner energy source • LIRAS  104 L⊙ embedded OB star • a few HCs contain UC HIIs!  OB stars • rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs • molecular outflows from several HCs •  HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

  20. Hot Cores (HCs) • Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs: • H2Omasers and high energy lines large nH2 and TK • many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains • TKR-3/4  inner energy source • LIRAS  104 L⊙ embedded OB star • a few HCs contain UC HIIs!  OB stars • rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs • molecular outflows from several HCs •  HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

  21. Hot Cores (HCs) • Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs: • H2Omasers and high energy lines large nH2 and TK • many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains • TKR-3/4  inner energy source • LIRAS  104 L⊙ embedded OB star • a few HCs contain UC HIIs!  OB stars • rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs • molecular outflows from several HCs • HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

  22. Beuther et al. (2002)

  23. Hot Cores (HCs) • Hot (100–200 K) cores often found close to UC HIIs: • H2Omasers and high energy lines large nH2 and TK • many rare molecules evaporation from dust grains • TKR-3/4  inner energy source • LIRAS  104 L⊙ embedded OB star • a few HCs contain UC HIIs!  OB stars • rotating circumstellar disks found in some HCs • molecular outflows from several HCs • HCs host young ZAMS high-mass stars

  24. Warm cores (WC) • Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57: • warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙) • luminous (LIRAS  104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs • few H2O masers (no OH masers)  prior to HC phase • no cm continuum emission  hypercompact HII? • weak evidence for disks and outflows • interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08 •  WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

  25. Warm cores (WC) • Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57: • warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙) • luminous (LIRAS  104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs • few H2Omasers (no OH masers)  prior to HC phase • no cm continuum emission  hypercompact HII? • weak evidence for disks and outflows • interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08 •  WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

  26. H2O maser

  27. Warm cores (WC) • Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57: • warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙) • luminous (LIRAS  104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs • few H2Omasers (no OH masers)  prior to HC phase • no cm continuum emission  hypercompact HII? • weak evidencefor disks and outflows • interesting candidate: the case of G24.78+0.08 •  WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

  28. IRAS23385+6053

  29. Warm cores (WC) • Mostly towards IRAS sources with [25-12]<0.57: • warm (50 K) but dense and massive (10–102 M⊙) • luminous (LIRAS  104 L⊙) high-mass YSOs • few H2Omasers (no OH masers)  prior to HC phase • no cm continuum emission  hypercompact HII? • weak evidencefor disks and outflows • interesting candidate:the case of G24.78+0.08 •  WCs may be “class 0” high-mass sources (?)

More Related