1 / 13

A comparative review of the fisheries management systems in New Zealand and in the EU

A comparative review of the fisheries management systems in New Zealand and in the EU. Paul Marchal, Lallemand P., Stokes T.K. & Thébaud O. SeaFIC (Wellington, New Zealand) / IFREMER (Boulogne, France) Marie Curie funded TRANZEF project EAF symposium, Boulogne s/mer, 5 th december 2008.

zuwena
Download Presentation

A comparative review of the fisheries management systems in New Zealand and in the EU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A comparative review of the fisheries management systems in New Zealand and in the EU Paul Marchal, Lallemand P., Stokes T.K. & Thébaud O. SeaFIC (Wellington, New Zealand) / IFREMER (Boulogne, France) Marie Curie funded TRANZEF project EAF symposium, Boulogne s/mer, 5th december 2008

  2. Quick facts

  3. Historical background

  4. Management processes

  5. Management objectives

  6. Management principles

  7. Management targets

  8. Management strategies

  9. Fisheries conservation measures

  10. Access regulation measures

  11. Sustainability performances

  12. The future

  13. What could we possibly learn? • Management processes? • Better transparency and broader stakeholder involvement • Management decisions more in line with the outcomes of stock assessment • Cost recovery (?) • Management targets? • There are merits in quantifying targets in the basic legislation • MSY not necessarily the desired target (or even limit) • Management strategies? • Discussions on HCR standards for all stocks (based on production and data availability) • TAC-based management? • Overall simplicity • Lack of stock assessments to support TAC-setting • May not be valid when stocks heavily depleted • Rights-based management? • Would formalise ad hoc practices and expected gain in economic efficiency • Issues: relative stability, social objectives, quota ownership, initial allocation, transferability

More Related