1 / 1

Introduction

Microfracture for chondral defects of the knee Mr S. Kaleel , MRCS; Mr Z.Ahmad , MRCS; Mr S. Daivajna , MRCS; Mr C. Servant, FRCS Department of Orthopaedics, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom. Ipswich NHS Trust. Introduction

zurina
Download Presentation

Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Microfracture for chondral defects of the kneeMr S. Kaleel, MRCS;Mr Z.Ahmad, MRCS; Mr S. Daivajna, MRCS; Mr C. Servant, FRCSDepartment of Orthopaedics, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom.Ipswich NHS Trust Introduction • Chondral regeneration can occur when provided an appropriate environment for tissue regeneration. • Microfracture of the bone releases pluripotentmesenchymal stem cells from the subchondral bone marrow leading to fibrocartilage formation (Steadman) • Indications for microfracture treatment(Knutsen) • Full thickness loss of articular cartilage • Unstable cartilage overlying sub-chondral bone • Degenerative joint disease with normal alignment • Contraindications (Knutsen): • Malalignment/Instability • Partial thickness loss • Reciprocal lesions • Patient unable or unwilling to comply with rehabilitation • Systemic Inflammatory Arthritis • Clotting disorder Study Aim ● To evaluate the outcome of microfracture treatment for chondral defects. Patients and Methods • The patients were prospectively collected are those who were diagnosed with chondral defects between 2005-2009 • Single surgeon series: A total of 41 patients (27 Male: 14 females) with age range of 16-73 had microfracture performed on their knees. • We collected the mechanism of injury, compartment involved, BMI, time since injury, compartment, size of injury, and Tegner/Lysholm Scores. • Method: • Make curretage of area to remove unstable cartilage. • Clear subchondral bone(Fig. 1) • Bone is perforated with tapered tool 3mm in diameter and in depth. (Fig. 2) • Resulting clot will result in fibrocartilagenous repair.(Fig. 3) Results • 5. Recovery Protocol: • PFJ Protocol: • Cyclical exercise • Brace - locked to allow 0 - 30° • FWB within brace • Strength training within range set by brace • After 8 wks, wean out of brace • Closed chain exercises • Return to full activity at 4 months • Tibiofemoral protocol: • Cyclical exercise • Toe-touch weight-bearing for 6-8 wks • Cycling – from 1 to 2 weeks • Deep Water Exercise – from 1 to 2 weeks • After 8 wks, FWB and active ROM • No cutting, turning or jumping for 3-4 months • Distribution of defect: • Compartment Treated: • Distribution of BMI: Age-Lysholm Score Age-Tegner Score Traumatic group: 23 patients 15 femoral compartment 8 patella compartment Age Range: 16 to 58 Degenerative Group: 18 patients 8 femoral compartment 10 patella compartment Age Range: 20-73 • Conclusion: • Microfracture : • Tegner Score stays the same in under 40 year age group. • Lysholm improves by 30pts to 73 in younger age group. • Lysholm improves in pts with less than BMI 30 in both tibiofemoral group and patello femoral group. • Gives symptom relief for chondral defects • Is more effective in younger patients and for traumatic lesions • References: • Steadman 2003 Arthroscopy: • Outcomes of Microfracture for Traumatic Chondral Defects of the Knee in under 45 year old patients • Knutsen RCT JBJS 2004,2007 • ACI vs Microfracture 2yr & 5 yr results • Mithoefer: Prospective Cohort; JBJS 2005 • The Microfracture Technique for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions in the Knee. A prospective cohort study. Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3

More Related