1 / 10

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System. Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director. Office of Accountability and Assessments. Academic Performance Index API. 2. 2. Academic Performance Index (API) Component Diagram 2007-2008. 30%. 33.3%. Weighted

zuri
Download Presentation

Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments

  2. Academic Performance IndexAPI 2 2

  3. Academic Performance Index (API) Component Diagram 2007-2008 30% 33.3% Weighted average 10% 33.3% 33.3% OSTP – Oklahoma School Testing Program CRT – Criterion-Referenced Test EOI – End-of-Instruction Test AP – Advanced Placement 60% 3

  4. Point Contributions for High School and K-12 Districts 4

  5. Point Contributions for Elementary and Middle Schools, K-6 and K-8 Districts 5

  6. Adequate Yearly ProgressAYP 7

  7. AYP • Federal Law • Includes all students • Focus on four criteria: 1. Math achievement 2. Reading achievement 3. Participation in state testing 4. Attendance and graduation rates 7 8

  8. AYP Determinations For each student group, did the school site or district meet the required performance targets? Made Adequate Yearly Progress yes yes yes yes Math Performance Target Reading Performance Target *95% of Students Tested **Additional Indicator Performance Target no no no no Did Not Make Adequate Yearly Progress *Participation rates calculated separately for math and reading. **Attendance or graduation rate, as applicable. 8 9

  9. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Components 13 9

  10. Student Groups • All Students • Regular Education Students • Black • American Indian • Hispanic • Asian • White • Other • Economically Disadvantaged • English language learners (ELL) • Students with Individualized Education Programs (IEP) Race/Ethnicity and Economically Disadvantaged subgroups are disaggregated from ALL Students 14 10

More Related