1 / 21

Hydrologic Investigation of the Ka’a’awa Valley: An Attempt to Calculate Water Balance

Hydrologic Investigation of the Ka’a’awa Valley: An Attempt to Calculate Water Balance. James Douglas CSULB NSF-REU: GRAM Field Program June 2013 . Physical Characteristics/Hydrology. 1,742 Acres (2.7 sq. miles) 1715 mm/year average precipitation

zubin
Download Presentation

Hydrologic Investigation of the Ka’a’awa Valley: An Attempt to Calculate Water Balance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hydrologic Investigation of the Ka’a’awa Valley: An Attempt to Calculate Water Balance James Douglas CSULB NSF-REU: GRAM Field Program June 2013

  2. Physical Characteristics/Hydrology • 1,742 Acres (2.7 sq. miles) • 1715 mm/year average precipitation • Characterized by extreme topography, formed through volcanic processes (Koolau Divide) • Interesting surface hydrology • Dry drainage channels • Wetland present on main channel at rear of watershed • Disappearing/reappearing flow

  3. What is a Water Balance Anyway? • P = Q + E + S • Why do we care? • Allows for better understanding of hydrogeology • Climate Analysis • Management implications

  4. What is a Water Balance Anyway? • What do we need? • Precipitation Data • Geology/Soils Data • Solar Radiation Data • Temperature Data • Topographical Information • Vegetation Data Discharge Recharge Evapotranspiration

  5. First Attempt: Water Balance Toolbox • Developed by James Dyer, Ohio University • Created to calculate outputs from existing datasets • Designed In NE US, supposedly adaptable to differing conditions

  6. First Attempt: Realizations • Scale issues pervasive • Issues calibrating model • Solar Radiation maps • PET adjustment coefficients • Model limited by ignorance of vegetative impacts • Outputs neither especially helpful or accurate

  7. Switching Gears • Toolset abandoned in favor of new calculations • New strategy • Create flow accumulation model from 5m DEM • Collect discharge readings from stream • Compare theoretical and measured surface flow • Literature Review: Shade and Nichols • Water balance calculated for S, SE, and Windward Oahu • Used as a reference for expected ET and GW recharge

  8. Collecting Discharge Measurements • Transect established at bus turnaround stream crossing • Chosen as best point for consolidated channel flow • Width: 2m • Velocity readings and depths taken every 25cm • Midpoint formula employed to estimate flow

  9. Estimating Base Flow • Issue: Discharge reading gathered during elevated flow conditions • Solution: Velocity/Depth reading taken at same location earlier in week, used to normalize flow • Formula: Subtract 2 cm from depths, divide discharges by ½ • Final output: 21,750 cm3/sec (0.77 ft3/sec)

  10. Spatial Analysis • Flow accumulation model created in ArcMap • Converted accumulation to area above sample point • Precipitation grid averaged to rainflow/month • Area multiplied by precipitation gives theoretical discharge

  11. Calculation Results • Average monthly precipitation: 161.18 mm • Average daily precipitation: 5.4 mm • Area above sample point: 3,124,170 square meters • Theoretical discharge: PxA= 194,270 ccm/s (6.86 cfs) • Measured discharge: 21,750 ccm/s • % of theoretical accounted for by measured: 11.20% • Importance: 88.8% precipitation either ET or recharge

  12. Pulling in the Literature • Ka’a’awa water balance according to Shade and Nichols: Ka’a’awa Valley

  13. An Estimated Water Balance

  14. Conclusions/Future Directions • Scale issues still present in available datasets • Possible data to collect for future study: • Precipitation data within the Ka’a’awa valley • Vegetation classifications- density and spatial variability • Temperature monitoring that reflects E-W variation • More accurate soils data without gaps in AWC • More discharge data including storm event response, and value obtained above and below flow disappearance

  15. Data Used • Precipitation Data • Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii • Temperature Data • Iowa State Mesonet • Topography Data • IFSAR 5m DTM • Soils Data • SSURGO NRCS database • Water Budget • Water Budget and the Effects of Land-Use Changes on Ground-Water Recharge, Oahu, Hawaii 1996, Shade, Patricia J.; Nichols, William D. USGS Professional Paper: 1412-C

More Related