Element 1 4 step project selection process
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 26

Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 89 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process. Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process. Objective. Identify risk factors commonly associated with target crash type(s) experienced across a system. Suggest a focus on severe crashes (fatal + serious injury)

Download Presentation

Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Element 1 4 step project selection process

Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process

Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process


Objective

Objective

  • Identify risk factors commonly associated with target crash type(s) experienced across a system.

  • Suggest a focus on severe crashes (fatal + serious injury)

    • Consistent with national safety practices

    • May minimize effort and needed resources

Element 1, Step 1: Identify Target Crash Types & Risk Factors


Outcome

Outcome

  • Gain an understanding of the systemic program’s focus

    • Type of Crash

    • Facility Type (i.e., location type)

    • Risk Factors

Element 1, Step 1: Identify Target Crash Types & Risk Factors


Recommended minimum data

Recommended Minimum Data

  • Crashes by system (state and local)

  • Crash type (road departure, right angle, head-on rear end, turning, etc.)

  • Facility type (freeway, expressway and conventional)

  • Physical crash location description (urban/rural, intersection/segment, tangent/curve, topography, etc.)

  • Description of location (topography, intersection elements, segment elements)

Element 1, Step 1: Identify Target Crash Types & Risk Factors


Potentially useful data i e risk factors

Potentially Useful Data(i.e., Risk Factors)

  • Traffic volumes

  • Some Roadway Features

    • Number of lanes

    • Shoulder type/width

    • Road edge features/quality

    • Number/type of access

    • Radius of horizontal curves

    • Density of horizontal curves

    • Speed limit

    • Medians

  • Some Intersection Features

    • Number of approaches

    • Skew

    • Proximity to horizontal/vertical curves

    • Number of approach lanes

    • Signal timing

    • Proximity to railroad crossing

    • Traffic control devices

    • Presence of street lighting

    • Presence of commercial developments

Element 1, Step 1: Identify Target Crash Types & Risk Factors


Element 1 step 1

Element 1: Step 1

Element 1, Step 1: Identify Target Crash Types & Risk Factors


Element 1 step 1 task 1 select focus crash type s

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1Select Focus Crash Type(s)

Purpose:

  • Identify the greatest potential to reduce fatalities and severe injuries.

    Suggestion:

  • Identify crash type(s) representing the greatest number of severe crashes across system.

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1


Element 1 step 1 task 1 select focus crash type s1

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1Select Focus Crash Type(s)

  • Why is it important to select a focus crash type(s)?

  • There is no single countermeasure that is effective at addressing all crash types. Identifying a focus crash type(s) will help narrow down the list of countermeasures.

  • Q:

  • A:

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1


Element 1 step 1 task 1 select focus crash type s2

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1Select Focus Crash Type(s)

Resources:

  • State or regional SHSP

    • AASHTO’s 22 Emphasis Areas

  • Roadway Departure or Intersection Safety Implementation Plans

  • Other applicable safety plans

  • Statewide and regional crash data

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1


Element 1 step 1 task 1 select focus crash type s3

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1Select Focus Crash Type(s)

Process:

  • Reference emphasis areas defined in approved safety plans (State SHSP).

  • Stratify crash data into emphasis areas.

  • Select focus crash type(s):

    • Emphasis areas with highest frequency crashes

    • Priority order of emphasis areas in plans

    • Agency preferences

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1


Statewide data by safety emphasis area

Statewide Data by Safety Emphasis Area

Illustration: Jurisdictioncan make a difference

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1


Region data by safety emphasis area

Region Data by Safety Emphasis Area

Illustration: Consider impactof geography & topography

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1


Element 1 step 1 task 1 select focus crash type s4

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1Select Focus Crash Type(s)

Possible Challenges for Thurston County:

  • Relatively few severe crashes?…difficult to identify focus crash type(s)

  • Urban and rural areas have distinctly different crash patterns?

Element 1: Step 1, Task 1


Element 1 step 1 task 2 select focus facilities

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2Select Focus Facilities

Purpose:

  • Determine locations on roadway network where focus crashes occur most frequently.

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2


Element 1 step 1 task 2 select focus facilities1

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2 Select Focus Facilities

  • Why is it important to select focus facilities?

  • There is no single countermeasure that is appropriate for all situations. Identifying a focus facility type will help narrow down the list of countermeasures.

  • Q:

  • A:

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2


Element 1 step 1 task 2 select focus facilities2

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2Select Focus Facilities

Resources:

  • Roadway Departure or Intersection Safety Implementation Plans

  • Statewide and regional crash data

    Process:

  • Develop crash tree diagram.

  • Utilize diagram to identify and select focus facilities.

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2


Greater minnesota crash tree diagram

Greater Minnesota Crash Tree Diagram

Source: MnCMAT Crash Data, 2006-2010

Severe is fatal and serious injury crashes (K+A).

5 Year Crashes

156,182

4,902

-Region’s 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 – NO Metro

Example

All – %

Severe – %

CSAH/CR

36,716 – 24%

1,963 – 40%

State System

70,808 – 45%

2,000 – 41%

City, Twnshp, Other

48,658 – 31%

939 – 19%

Urban

14,086 – 38%

337 – 17%

Rural

22,630 – 62%

1,626 – 83%

Not Animal

18,616 – 82%

1,566 – 96%

Animal

4,009 – 18%

60 – 4%

Unknown/Other

1,577 – 11%

17 – 5%

Not Inters-Related

5,177 – 37%

175 – 52%

Inters-Related

7,332 – 52%

145 – 43%

Unknown/Other

1,276 – 7%

61 – 4%

Inters-Related

5,487 – 29%

463 – 30%

Not Inters-Related

11,849 – 64%

1,042 –66%

Run Off Road – 1,202 (23%), 69 (39%)

Head On – 366 (7%), 27 (15%)

“Other” – 540 (10%), 25 (14%)

Rear End – 1,336 (26%), 17 (10%)

Other/Unknown

2,600 – 47%

228 – 49%

Signalized

209 – 4%

4 – 1%

All Way Stop

164 – 3%

15 – 3%

Thru-Stop

2,511 – 46%

216 – 47%

Head On, SS Opp.

751 – 6%

132 – 13%

Run off Road

7,891 – 67%

675 – 65%

Signalized

2,308 – 31%

32 – 22%

All Way Stop

445 – 6%

5 – 3%

Thru-Stop

2,697 – 37%

65 – 45%

Other/Unknown

1,881 – 26%

43 – 30%

Run Off Road – 999 (38%), 95 (42%)

Right Angle – 268 (10%), 39 (17%)

“Other” – 303 (12%), 29 (13%)

Head On – 112 (4%), 21 (9%)

On Curve

247 – 33%

46 – 35%

On Curve

3,222 – 40%

339 – 50%

Right Angle – 633 (27%), 15 (47%)

Rear End – 799 (35%), 5 (16%)

Left Turn – 375 (16%), 5 (16%)

Head On – 100 (4%), 4 (13%)

Right Angle – 1,268 (47%), 37 (86%)

“Other” – 252 (9%), 9 (21%)

Left Turn – 268 (10%), 4 (9%)

Rear End – 333 (12%), 3 (7%)

Right Angle – 849 (34%), 122 (56%)

“Other” – 464 (18%), 33 (15%)

Run Off Road – 342 (14%), 21 (10%)

Left Turn – 184 (7%), 10 (5%)

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2


Element 1 step 1 task 2 select focus facilities3

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2Select Focus Facilities

  • Suggest Minimum Crash Tree Combinations:

    • Location (urban / rural)

    • Ownership (state and local)

    • Segment or intersection

    • Segment type (freeway, multilane, two-lane, one-way)

    • Intersection control type (signal, stop, yield)

  • Additional Crash Tree Combinations:

    • Tangent or curve

    • High- or low-speed

    • Presence of street lighting

    • District or regions

Element 1: Step 1, Task 2


Element 1 step 1 task 3 identify and evaluate risk factors

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3Identify and Evaluate Risk Factors

Purpose:

Document the most common characteristics of the crash locations to further define the facility types selected from the crash tree in Step 1, Task 2.

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


Element 1 step 1 task 3 identify and evaluate risk factors1

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3Identify and Evaluate Risk Factors

  • Why are risk factors needed?

  • Risk factors help differentiate which locations may have the greatest potential for a future focus crash type.

  • These locations become the priority for where to deploy countermeasures.

  • Q:

  • A:

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


Element 1 step 1 task 3 identify and evaluate risk factors2

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3Identify and Evaluate Risk Factors

Resources:

  • Crash data at statewide and regional levels

  • Road and intersection data

  • Highway Safety Manual

  • FHWA’s Crash Modification Factor Clearinghouse

  • Published research documenting the effectiveness of strategies

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


Element 1 step 1 task 3 identify and evaluate risk factors3

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3Identify and Evaluate Risk Factors

Process:

  • Determine potential risk factors considering:

    • Ability to indicate greater potential for a future severe focus crash type

    • Availability of data element in existing databases or the ability to quickly gather data if not already available

    • Quality of data element if contained in existing databases

    • Applicability of data element to focus crash type and facility type

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


Element 1 step 1 task 3 identify and evaluate risk factors4

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3Identify and Evaluate Risk Factors

Process:

2. Evaluate potential risk factors for a relationship to future crash potential:

  • Formal statistical analysis to determine if risk factor associated with crash frequency

  • Compare proportions…proportion of all locations with the characteristic versus proportion severe crash locations with (descriptive statistics)

  • Review published research to identify Crash Modification Factors

    3. Select risk factors.

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


Evaluation of segment traffic volume as potential risk factor

Evaluation of Segment Traffic Volume as Potential Risk Factor

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


Evaluation of curve radius as potential risk factor

Evaluation of Curve Radius as Potential Risk Factor

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


Evaluation of access density as potential risk factor

Evaluation of Access Density as Potential Risk Factor

Element 1: Step 1, Task 3


  • Login