1 / 8

Selection in Column Monotone Matrices , X + Y and Heaps

Selection in Column Monotone Matrices , X + Y and Heaps. 1. [G.N. Frederickson, D.B. Johnson, The Complexity of Selection and Ranking in X+Y and Matrices with Sorted Columns , Journal of Computer and System Sciences 24(2): 197-208, 1982]

zorana
Download Presentation

Selection in Column Monotone Matrices , X + Y and Heaps

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Selection in Column Monotone Matrices, X + Y and Heaps 1 [G.N. Frederickson, D.B. Johnson, The Complexity of Selection and Ranking in X+Y and Matrices with Sorted Columns, Journal of Computer and System Sciences 24(2): 197-208, 1982] [G.N. Frederickson, An Optimal Algorithm for Selection in a Min-Heap, Inf. Comput. 104(2): 197-214, 1993] 3 4 6 5 7 9 14 11 8 21 10 13 12 42 Column monotone X+ Y Heap = Select(7)

  2. Partition (I1,i,I2) jI1 : xj  xijI2 : xi  xj Select(k)  find partitionwith |I1|+1 = k Select(6) Algorithm : BinarysearchusingSelect Time : O(n + n/2 + n/4 + ∙∙∙ + 2 + 1) = O(n) [M. Blum, R.W. Floyd, V. Pratt, R. Rivest and R. Tarjan, Time bounds for selection, J. Comp. Syst. Sci. 7 (1973) 448-461] <p >p T(n) = n + T(n/5) + T(7n/10) = O(n) Weighted-Select(w) Find partition with w - wi ΣjI1wj < w Weighted-Select(18)

  3. Selection in Column Monotone Matrices m k m k/2 k m k m k ... k∙logk Selectk Selectk/2 1 2 k k k k n n n n (permute columns) (log kiterations) 3 Result so far... Identified O(k) elements in prefixes of p = min{m,k} columns Time so far... O(m + p + p/2 + p/4 +∙∙∙+ 1) = O(m) weight(x) x Weighted-Select(k)on k+k/2+k/4+∙∙∙+1= O(k) elements 2kcandidatesleft (green + yellow)

  4. Selection in Column Monotone Matrices Select(k,N,p) assumek  N/2 (N = total length of the p lists)  2N  0.086∙N Elliminate  = 1- 1/2 = 0.29 ∙length   x x x recurse • (1-)2N = N/2 • i.e. k’th smallest not elliminated N (1-)N Weighted-Select(N) Weight of element = length of list Result so far... Identified O(k) elements in prefixes of p = min{m,k} columns Time so far... O(m + p + p/2 + p/4 +∙∙∙+ 1) = O(m) • N = O(p)  Select(k) • k< N/2  symmetricwithreverseorder • T(N) = p + T( (1-2)∙N) =O(p∙log (N/p)) Total time O(m+p∙log(k/p)), p = min { k, m} k = O(m) : O(m) k = (m) : O(m∙log(k/m))

  5. Selection in X + Y ̶ reuse column monotone algorithm ? n  m m k m k/2 k m k m k ... k∙logk Selectk Selectk/2 1 2 k k k k n n n n (permute columns) (log kiterations) X works Time O(m) 21 3 22 weight(x) < < < < < < x 23 Weighted-Select(k)onk+k/2+k/4+∙∙∙+1= O(k) elements 2kcandidatesleft Semi-sorting 2-powers Time n+n/2+n/4+∙∙∙+1 = O(n)

  6. Selection in X + Y ̶ reuse column monotone algorithm ? Select(k,N,p) assumek  N/2 (N = total length of the p lists)  = 1/4 Total time O(m+p∙log(k/p)), p = min { k, m} k = O(m) : O(m) k = (m) : O(m+k∙log(k/m)) ∙length (the same) X 21 < < < < < < 22 Eachiterationrefinesemi-sorting  O(n) per level 23 Canapproximate sample by a closeenoughsemi-sorted element Semi-sorting 2-powers Time n+n/2+n/4+∙∙∙+1 = O(n)

  7. [F93] considersadditionally... • How to computerank(x) in column monotone and X+Y matrices in O(m+p∙log(k/p)), p = min {k, m} • Provesthat the boundsareoptimal

  8. Selection in a BinaryHeap • [G.N. Frederickson, An Optimal Algorithm for Selection in a Min-Heap, Inf. Comput. 104(2): 197-214, 1993] front • k x DeleteMin O(k∙logn) • k x DeleteMinfront  O(k∙logk) k∙logk  k∙loglogk  k∙logloglogk  k∙3log* k k∙2log* k  k k smallest in sortedorder Ω(k∙logk)lowerbound only the kthsmallest  Ω(k)lowerbound • clans of size log k • auxiliary heap of clan representatives (max) • ExtractMin representative & construct 2 clans • k/log k’thExtractMin representative x has rank k..2k • select(k) on all elements  x • Total time O(k∙loglogk + k/log k∙logk + k) 1 clan 3 4 max defined from poor relatives of Ci 6 5 7 9 Ci defined from offsprings of Ci 14 11 8 21 10 13 12 42 poor relatives Cj Cj clan construction auxiliary heap min selection offspringsCj

More Related