1 / 22

Surviving Reaffirmation: Two TSTC Approaches to Compliance & the QEP

Surviving Reaffirmation: Two TSTC Approaches to Compliance & the QEP. Texas Association for Institutional Research 27 th Annual Conference February 23, 2005 Presented by. Kathy Kennedy Manager-ORPA SACS Accreditation Liaison. Blanca Trevi ñ o Bauer Director-IER

zonta
Download Presentation

Surviving Reaffirmation: Two TSTC Approaches to Compliance & the QEP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surviving Reaffirmation:Two TSTC Approaches to Compliance & the QEP Texas Association for Institutional Research 27th Annual Conference February 23, 2005 Presented by Kathy Kennedy Manager-ORPA SACS Accreditation Liaison Blanca Treviño Bauer Director-IER SACS Accreditation Liaison

  2. Two Essential Components of Reaffirmation • Compliance Certification • Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP)

  3. The First Component: The Compliance Certification

  4. TSTC Harlingen’s Story… • Reviewed work of pilot institution’s • Selected SACS Leadership Team (SLT) • SLT assigned Principles based on expertise/area of responsibility • Established aggressive timelines • Narratives completed by Dec. ’03, BUT format of all later changed • Little attention paid to QEP development

  5. Approaching Compliance: • Select a Leadership Team with authority • Set aggressive timeline based on complexity of each Principle • Ensure enough IT expertise • Before narratives are entered, outline, plan, and collect all documentation to support requirement

  6. Approaching Compliance • Plan narratives/organize based on 1) the amount and types of documentation 2) a standard format all “writers” follow 3) responses to all sections of Principle • Promptly identify: 1) documentation to be converted to electronic format, 2) documentation/information best presented through database format, 3) any elements college is not doing and begin planning/implementing immediately

  7. TSTC Harlingen . . .Show & Tell • Visual design & ease of use is important • Use databases! (Assessment Plans, Program Review reports, policies & procedures, position descriptions, “closing the loop” examples) • Embed references in text…no extraneous documents • Cross-reference between principles • Use pictures to tell your story (labs, library) • Don’t let narrative get tedious for the reader

  8. Go to: http://sacs.harlingen.tstc.edu To access the secure system, use the following: username: sacs password: SACScoc2005 (login username and password are case sensitive) Questions: contact Blanca Treviño Bauer at blanca.bauer@harlingen.tstc.edu or 956.364.4050 To access TSTC Harlingen’sreaffirmation documents(Compliance & QEP)

  9. The Second Component: The QEP

  10. Importance of the QEP QEP Impact on Student Learning Impact on the Institution

  11. First Things First • Read carefully the “Handbook for Review Committees” published by SACS • Determine what should be in a QEP • Establish an internal timeline

  12. Developing a QEPTSTC West Texas Experience • Highlights (see Chronology Handout) • Assessed the college’s needs through a variety of methods • Focus groups • Surveys • Strategic planning and SWOT analyses

  13. Developing a QEP • The Team • Members • Meetings • Student learning in the context of our QEP

  14. Review Criteria and the West Texas Experience The Focus • Finding our Focus • Research Information • College Community Input • Business and Industry Surveys and Advisory Committee recommendations • The Executive Summary

  15. The Review CriteriaInstitutional Capability…. • Answered the following questions • Who will be responsible? • Do we have the resources to implement and sustain the plan? • Fiscal resources • Expertise (internal and external) • Do we have the support of administration, faculty, staff, and business and industry?

  16. The Review CriteriaAssessment • Based on goals and objectives from committees concerning: • Processes • Student learning • Overall plan • Developed narrative • Created chart of process

  17. The Review CriteriaDeveloping Broad-based Involvement • Focus Groups, surveys, development activities • Committees • Importance of committee chairs • Number of committees/purpose • Empowering committee members • Retreat • Preparing for the visit

  18. Putting It All Together • Lead writer • Editor • Content reviewers/contributors • Final editor • Preparation for the visit • Evaluators • Informing the college community • Scheduling

  19. To access TSTC West Texas reaffirmation documents (QEP) Quality Enhancement Plan: http://www.westtexas.tstc.edu/qep Questions: Contact Kathy Kenney at Kathy.Kennedy@sweetwater.tstc.edu or 325.235.7379

  20. Final thoughts • Create balance between demands of Compliance Certification and QEP • Communication among ALL is a must • If Accreditation Liaison, know what is happening in all areas (QEP, audits, policies, assessment plans), push Leadership Team members to meet their deadlines • Support from President is key throughout the two years—USE IT!

  21. Questions?

  22. Thanks for ComingGood Luck with your own SACS journey!

More Related