Topics in Microeconometrics
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 31

Topics in Microeconometrics Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 59 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Topics in Microeconometrics Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University at Curtin Business School Curtin University Perth July 22-24, 2013. 1. Efficiency. Modeling Inefficiency. The Production Function.

Download Presentation

Topics in Microeconometrics Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Topics in microeconometrics professor william greene stern school of business new york university

Topics in Microeconometrics

Professor William Greene

Stern School of Business, New York University

at

Curtin Business School

Curtin University

Perth

July 22-24, 2013


Topics in microeconometrics professor william greene stern school of business new york university

1. Efficiency


Modeling inefficiency

Modeling Inefficiency


The production function

The Production Function

“A single output technology is commonly described by means of a production functionf(z) that gives the maximum amount q of output that can be produced using input amounts (z1,…,zL-1) > 0.

“Microeconomic Theory,” Mas-Colell, Whinston, Green: Oxford, 1995, p. 129. See also Samuelson (1938) and Shephard (1953).


Thoughts on inefficiency

Thoughts on Inefficiency

Failure to achieve the theoretical maximum

  • Hicks (ca. 1935) on the benefits of monopoly

  • Leibenstein (ca. 1966): X inefficiency

  • Debreu, Farrell (1950s) on management inefficiency

    All related to firm behavior in the absence of

    market restraint – the exercise of market

    power.


A history of empirical investigation

A History of Empirical Investigation

  • Cobb-Douglas (1927)

  • Arrow, Chenery, Minhas, Solow (1963)

  • Joel Dean (1940s, 1950s)

  • Johnston (1950s)

  • Nerlove (1960)

  • Berndt, Christensen, Jorgenson,

    Lau (1972)

  • Aigner, Lovell, Schmidt (1977)


Inefficiency in the real world

Inefficiency in the “Real” World

Measurement of inefficiency in “markets” – heterogeneous production outcomes:

  • Aigner and Chu (1968)

  • Timmer (1971)

  • Aigner, Lovell, Schmidt (1977)

  • Meeusen, van den Broeck (1977)


Production functions

Production Functions


Defining the production set

Defining the Production Set

Level set:

The Production function is defined by the isoquant

The efficient subset is defined in terms of the level sets:


Isoquants and level sets

Isoquants and Level Sets


The distance function

The Distance Function


Inefficiency in production

Inefficiency in Production


Production function model with inefficiency

Production Function Model with Inefficiency


Cost inefficiency

Cost Inefficiency

y* = f(x)  C* = g(y*,w)

(Samuelson – Shephard duality results)

Cost inefficiency: If y < f(x), then C must be greater than g(y,w). Implies the idea of a cost frontier.

lnC = lng(y,w) + u, u > 0.


Specification

Specification


Corrected ordinary least squares

Corrected Ordinary Least Squares


Modified ols

Modified OLS

An alternative approach that requires a parametric model of the distribution of ui is modified OLS (MOLS).

The OLS residuals, save for the constant displacement, are pointwise consistent estimates of their population counterparts, - ui. Suppose that ui has an exponential distribution with mean λ. Then, the variance of ui is λ2, so the standard deviation of the OLS residuals is a consistent estimator of E[ui] = λ. Since this is a one parameter distribution, the entire model for ui can be characterized by this parameter and functions of it.

The estimated frontier function can now be displaced upward by this estimate of E[ui].


Cols and mols

COLS and MOLS


Principles

Principles

  • The production function resembles a regression model (with a structural interpretation).

  • We are modeling the disturbance process in more detail.


Frontier functions

Frontier Functions


Deterministic frontier programming estimators

Deterministic Frontier: Programming Estimators


Estimating inefficiency

Estimating Inefficiency


Statistical problems with programming estimators

Statistical Problems with Programming Estimators

  • They do correspond to MLEs.

  • The likelihood functions are “irregular”

  • There are no known statistical properties – no estimable covariance matrix for estimates.

  • They might be “robust,” like LAD.

    • Noone knows for sure.

    • Never demonstrated.


An orthodox frontier model with a statistical basis

An Orthodox Frontier Modelwith a Statistical Basis


Extensions

Extensions

  • Cost frontiers, based on duality results:

    ln y = f(x) – u  ln C = g(y,w) + u’

    u > 0. u’ > 0. Economies of scale and

    allocative inefficiency blur the relationship.

  • Corrected and modified least squares estimators based on the deterministic frontiers are easily constructed.


Data envelopment analysis

Data Envelopment Analysis


Methodological problems with dea

Methodological Problems with DEA

  • Measurement error

  • Outliers

  • Specification errors

  • The overall problem with the deterministic frontier approach


Dea and sfa same answer

DEA and SFA: Same Answer?

  • Christensen and Greene data

    • N=123 minus 6 tiny firms

    • X = capital, labor, fuel

    • Y = millions of KWH

  • Cobb-Douglas Production Function vs. DEA

  • (See Coelli and Perelman (1999).)


Comparing the two methods

Comparing the Two Methods.


Total factor productivity

Total Factor Productivity


  • Login