# Accounting for Overhead Costs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45

Accounting for Overhead Costs. Chapter 13. Pioneered the “direct business model “ of selling computers Many orders are taken over the internet Need to know product cost Chapter focuses on applying overhead to products. Learning Objective 1. Compute budgeted factory-overhead rates

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#### Presentation Transcript

Chapter 13

• Pioneered the “direct business model “ of selling computers

• Many orders are taken over the internet

• Need to know product cost

• Chapter focuses on applying overhead to products

### Learning Objective 1

• Compute budgeted

• and apply factory

to the products is an important part of

accurately measuring product costs.

Steps:

1. Select one or more cost drivers.

2. Prepare a factory overhead budget.

3. Compute the factory overhead rate.

4. Obtain actual cost-driver data.

to the products.

6. Account for any differences between the

amount of actual and applied overhead.

÷ Total budgeted amount of cost driver

Enriquez Machine Parts Company’s

the machining department is \$277,800.

Budgeted machine hours are 69,450.

What is the rate?

\$277,800 ÷ 69,450 = \$4 per machine hour

Suppose that at the end of the year Enriquez

had used 70,000 hours in Machining.

How much overhead was applied to Machining?

70,000 × \$4 = \$280,000

### Objective 2

• Determine and use appropriate

• application.

### Choice of Cost Drivers

No one cost driver is right for all situations.

The accountant’s goal is to find the

driver that best links cause and effect.

### Choice of Cost Drivers

A separate cost pool should

be identified for each driver.

Driver 1

Pool 1

Driver 2

Pool 2

### Learning Objective 3

• Identify the meaning and

• purpose of normalized

“Normal” product costs include

an average or normalized

Actual direct material

+ Actual direct labor

= Cost of manufactured product

### Disposing of Underapplied or Overapplied Overhead

Suppose that Enriquez applied

\$375,000 to its products.

Also, suppose that Enriquez incurred

\$392,000 of actual manufacturing

### Disposing of Underapplied or Overapplied Overhead

How much was underapplied?

\$392,000 actual – \$375,000 applied = \$17,000

392,000

375,000

17,000

0

Cost of Goods Sold

17,000

### Prorating Among Inventories

Prorate \$17,000 of underapplied

ending account balances:

Work-in-Process Inventory\$ 155,000

Finished Goods Inventory 32,000

Cost of Goods Sold 2,480,000

Total\$2,667,000

### Prorating Among Inventories

\$17,000 × 155/2,667

= 988 to Work-in-Process Inventory

\$17,000 × 32/2,667

= \$204 to Finished Goods Inventory

\$17,000 × 2,480/2,667

= \$15,808 to Cost of Goods Sold

### The Use of Variable and Fixed Application Rates

The presence of fixed costs is a

major reason of costing difficulties.

Some companies distinguish between

### Variable VersusAbsorption Costing

This section compares two

methods of product costing.

Variable

costing

Absorption

costing

### Variable VersusAbsorption Costing

Variable costing excludes fixed

from inventoriable costs.

Absorption costing treats fixed

as inventoriable costs.

Basic Production Data at Standard Cost

Direct material\$205

Direct labor 75

Standard variable costs per unit\$300

### Facts and Illustration

The annual budget for fixed manufacturing

Budgeted production is 15,000 computers.

Sales price = \$500 per unit

\$20 per computer is variable overhead.

Fixed S&A expenses = \$650,000

Sales commissions = 5% of dollar sales

### Facts and Illustration

Units 2003 2004

Opening inventory – 3,000

Production17,00014,000

Sales14,00016,000

Ending inventory 3,000 1,000

### Learning Objective 4

• Construct an income statement

• using the variable-costing

• approach.

(thousands of dollars) 2003 2004

Variable expenses:

Variable manufacturing cost

of goods sold

Opening inventory, at –\$ 900

standard costs of \$300

manufactured at standard,

17,000 and 14,000 units 5100 4200

Available for sale, 17,000 units 5100 5100

Ending inventory, at \$300 900¹ 300²

Variable manufacturing

cost of goods sold\$4200\$4800

### Cost of Goods Sold forVariable- Costing Method

¹3,000 units × \$300 = \$900,000 ²1,000 units × \$300 = \$300,000

(thousands of dollars) 2003 2004

Sales, 14,000 and 16,000 units\$7,000\$8,000

Variable expenses:

Variable manufacturing

cost of goods sold 42004800

Variable selling expenses,

at 5% of dollar sales 350 400

Contribution margin\$2,450\$2,800

Fixed expenses:

Fixed selling and admin. expenses 650 650

Operating income, variable costing\$ 300\$ 650

### Learning Objective 5

• Construct an income statement

• using the absorption-

• costing approach.

amount of fixed manufacturing

unit of production.

\$1,500,000 ÷ 15,000 = \$100

(thousands of dollars) 2003 2004

Beginning inventory\$ –\$1,200

at standard, of \$400* 6,800 5,600

Available for sale\$6,800\$6,800

Deduct: Ending inventory 1,200 400

Cost of goods sold, at standard\$5,600\$6,400

### Cost of Goods Sold forAbsorption-Costing Method

*Variable cost\$300

Fixed cost 100

Standard absorption cost\$400

(thousands of dollars) 2003 2004

Sales\$7,000\$8,000

Cost of goods sold, at standard5,6006,400

Gross profit at standard\$1,400\$1,600

Production-volume variance* 200 F 100 U

Gross margin or gross profit “actual”\$1,600\$1,500

Selling and administrative expenses 1,000 1,050

Operating income, variable costing\$ 600\$ 450

### Comparative Income Statement for Absorption-Costing Method

*Based on expected volume of production of 15,000 units:

2003: (17,000 – 15,000) × \$100 = \$200,000 F

2004: (14,000 – 15,000) × \$100 = \$100,000 U

### Learning Objective 6

• Compute the production-

• volume variance and show

• how it should appear in

• the income statement.

### Production-Volume Variance

= (Actual volume × Fixed-overhead rate) –

In practice, the production-volume variance

is usually called simply the volume variance.

Expected volume

×

=

Production-volume variance

Actual volume

### Production-Volume Variance

A production-volume variance arises when

the actual production volume achieved

does not coincide with the expected

volume of production used as a denominator

There is no production-volume

Do 13-43

### Reconciliation of Variable Costing and Absorption Costing

Absorption unit cost is higher.

Output-level (production-volume)

variance exists only under

absorption costing.

### Reconciliation of Variable Costing and Absorption Costing

appears in the cost of goods sold and

also in the production-volume variance.

Under variable costing, fixed

### Reconciliation of Variable Costing and Absorption Costing

The difference between income reported

under these two methods is entirely due to

the treatment of fixed manufacturing costs.

Under absorption costing, these costs are

treated as assets (inventory) until the

associated goods are sold.

### Learning Objective 7

• Explain how a company might

• prefer to use a variable-

• costing approach.

### Why Use Variable Costing?

One reason is that absorption-costing

income is affected by production

volume while variable-costing

income is not.

Another reason is based on which

system the company believes

performance.

### Flexible-Budget Variances

All variances other than the

production-volume variance are

essentially flexible-budget variances.

### Flexible-Budget Variances

Flexible-budget variances measure

components of the differences

between actual amounts and

the flexible-budget amounts

for the output achieved.

### Flexible-Budget Variances

Flexible budgets are primarily

designed to assist planning and

control rather than product costing.

### Effects of Sales and Productionon Reported Income

Production > Sales

Variable costing income is lower

than absorption income.

Production < Sales

Variable costing income is higher

than absorption income.