UPDATE ON GCIG TRIALS FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
Download
1 / 36

UPDATE ON GCIG TRIALS FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER Christian Marth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 357 Views
  • Uploaded on

UPDATE ON GCIG TRIALS FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER Christian Marth. Closed Trials. EORTC 55971. Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients closed / 550 Leading EORTC Participating NCIC CTG Presentated at IGCS 2008. in press. Tarceva Trial EORTC 55041.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'UPDATE ON GCIG TRIALS FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER Christian Marth' - zion


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Slide2 l.jpg

Closed Trials


Slide3 l.jpg

EORTC 55971

Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Patients closed / 550

Leading EORTC

Participating NCIC CTG

Presentated at IGCS 2008

in press


Slide4 l.jpg

Tarceva Trial EORTC 55041

Tarceva consolidation 2 years

Primary Chemotherapy

Control

Patients closed / 835

Leading EORTC

Participating AGO-AUSTRIA, ANZGOG, GINECO,

MRC/NCIC, MANGO


Slide5 l.jpg

ICON-7

TC ± BEVACIZUMAB

Patients closed / 1520

Leading MRC/NCRI

Participating NCIC CTG, AGO OVAR, GINECO, GEICO

EORTC, ANZGOG, NSGO


Slide6 l.jpg

GOG 218

CT vs CT + Bevacizumab Placebo vs

CT + Bevacizumab concurrent and extended

Patients closed / 1800

Leading GOG

Participating ECOG, NCCTG, NSABP, SWOG


Slide7 l.jpg

Calypso

Published Ahead of Print on May 24, 2010


Slide8 l.jpg

AGO-OVAR-9

Carbo Paclitaxel +/- Gemcitabine

Patients closed 1742

Leading AGO-OVAR

Participating GINECO, NSGO,

in press


Slide9 l.jpg

SCOTROC 4

Carbo Flat Dosing vs Intrapatient Dose Escalation

Patients closed 932

Leading SGCTG

Participating ANZGOG

Manuscript in preparation


Slide10 l.jpg

HECTOR

Carbo Topo vs Chemo (CT or CG) in recurrent

Platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

Patients closed 550

Leading NOGGO/AGO-OVAR

Participating AGO-AUSTRIA, GEICO


Slide11 l.jpg

AGO-OVAR-OP.2 DESKTOP II

Evaluation of predictive factors for complete resection in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer

Patients closed/412

Leading AGO-OVAR

Participating AGO-AUSTRIA, MITO,

selected Canadian+Australian centers

Report IGCS 2008, in preparation


Slide12 l.jpg

Open/PlannedTrials


Slide13 l.jpg

AGO-OVAR-12

Carbo Paclitaxel +/- BIBF 1120 (Vargatef)

Patients 146 / 1300 (2:1 random)

Leading AGO-OVAR

Participating AGO-Austria, BGOG, GINECO, MANGO, MITO, NSGO, US Oncology


Slide14 l.jpg

AGO-OVAR 16

Pazopanib consolidation 1 yr

First Line Chemotherapy

Control

Patients 752 / 900

Leading AGO-OVAR

Participating

AGOAustria, ANZGOG, BGOG, GEICO, GINECO, ICORG, JGOG, KGOG, MANGO, MITO, NSGO, US-Sites: California Consortium, NY GOG, SWOG


Slide15 l.jpg

AGO – OVAR OP.3 (LION)

Lymphadenectomy In Ovarian Neoplasms

epithelial invasive

ovarian cancer

FIGO IIB - IV

ECOG 0/1 and

no CI against LNE

no visible extra-

and intra-abdominal

tumor residuals

no bulky lymph nodes

System. Lymphadenectomy

  • pelvic

  • para-aortic

R

184/640

no Lymphadenectomy

Endpoints: OS, PFS, QoL Strata: centre, PS ,age

Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft


Slide16 l.jpg

JGOG-3017 Clear Cell Carcinoma

CT vs CDDP + Irinotecan

Patients 541 / 600

Leading JGOG

Participating GINECO, GOG, KGOG, MITO, SGCTG


Slide17 l.jpg

MITO-7

Weekly CT vs 3-weekly CT (QoL)

Patients 227 / 400

Leading MITO

Participating MaNGO


Slide18 l.jpg

MITO-8

LipDox vs CT cross-over

in 6-12 m platinum-free interval

Patients 46 / 253

Leading MITO

Participating MaNGO, AGO-OVAR


Slide19 l.jpg

Aurelia

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-resistant EOC

Patients 110 / 332

Leading GINECO

Participating AGO-OVAR, GEICO, MITO, NSGO


Slide20 l.jpg

AGO-OVAR-OP.4 DESKTOP III

Cytoreductive surgery vs NO surgery

in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC

Patients 0 / 385 activated June 1

Leading AGO-OVAR

Participating ?


Slide21 l.jpg

CHORUS

Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Patients 535 / 550

Leading MRC

Participating


Slide22 l.jpg

ICON6A Randomised Trial of Concurrent Cediranib (with Platinum-based Chemotherapy) and Maintenance Cediranib in Women with Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer




Slide25 l.jpg
mEOC

A multicentre randomised factorial trial comparing oxaliplatin + capecitabine, bevacizumab and carboplatin + paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated mucinous Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (mEOC)

mEOC is an intergroup study with two identical protocols

from GOG and NCRI with a single analysis

Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre


Meoc gog 241 2x2 factorial trial design l.jpg
mEOC/GOG#241 2x2 Factorial Trial Design

Mucinous ovarian cancer FIGO stages II–IV OR recurrent stage I; No previous chemotherapy; >18yrs; PS=0-2

Randomise

(332 patients – 83 patients in each arm)

Oxaliplatin & Capecitabine

6 cycles q 21d

Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 w

5 or 6* cycles

Carboplatin & Paclitaxel

6 cycles q 21d

Oxaliplatin & Capecitabine

6 cycles q 21d

Oxaliplatin & Capecitabine

6 cycles q 21d

Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 w

5 or 6* cycles

Clinical assessment every 6 weeks for 36 weeks

Telephone call at week 3 between every 6-week visit

Bevacizumab 15mg/kg q3 weeks for 12 cycles

Clinical assessment every 6 weeks for 36 weeks

Response assessment:

CT scans are carried out post cycle 3 of chemo, 1 month after completion of cycle 6, then 3 monthly for Year 1

Follow up: 3 monthly years 1-2, 6 monthly years 3-5

*Bevacizumab can be omitted from the first cycle of if chemotherapy must be started within 4 weeks of surgery.


Slide27 l.jpg

An international three-stage randomised trial of dose-fractionated chemotherapy compared to standard three-weekly chemotherapy, following immediate primary surgery or as part of delayed primary surgery, for women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.


Slide28 l.jpg

ARM1 dose-fractionated chemotherapy compared to standard three-weekly chemotherapy, following immediate primary surgery or as part of delayed primary surgery, for women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.: C q 3/52

P q 3/52

(current std)

Surgery (IPS)

Chemotherapy

6 cycles

ARM2: C q 3/52

P q 1/52

Randomisation

ARM3: C q 1/52

P q 1/52

Chemotherapy

(x 3)

Surgery (DPS)

Chemotherapy

( x 3)

(A) Immediate Primary Surgery (IPS)

One trial with pre-specified stratification for IPD v DPS

(B) Delayed Primary Surgery (DPS)

  • Cycle 3 administered as standard 3-weekly cycle in all patients for DPS


Treatment regimens l.jpg

Arm 1- Carboplatin AUC5 q3w dose-fractionated chemotherapy compared to standard three-weekly chemotherapy, following immediate primary surgery or as part of delayed primary surgery, for women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer.

Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 q3w

(standard of care)

Arm 2- Carboplatin AUC5 q3w

Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 q1w

(JGOG 3016 regimen)

Arm 3- Carboplatin AUC2 q1w

Paclitaxel 80mg/m2 q1w

1485 women recruited over 3 years

Treatment Regimens


Slide30 l.jpg

International randomised phase III study of a PARP inhibitor versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

540 patients over 4.5 years with 1 yr FU

  • Primary variable:

    • PFS

  • Secondary variables:

    • ORR by RECIST

    • Ca125 response (GCIG)

    • OS


Slide31 l.jpg

iPocc Trial versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline

IntraPeritoneal therapy for Ovarian Cancer with Carboplatin

(GOTIC-001 / JGOG3019)

A Randomized Phase II/III Trial of 3 Weekly Intraperitoneal versus Intravenous Carboplatin in Combination with Intravenous Weekly Dose-Dense Paclitaxel for Newly Diagnosed Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Study Chair

Keiichi Fujiwara

Saitama Medical University International Medical Center


Slide32 l.jpg

Schema versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Stages II-IV

Including Bulky Tumor

RANDOMIZATION

Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV Day1,8,15

Carboplatin AUC 6 IP

Q21, 6-8 Cycles

Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV Day1,8,15

Carboplatin AUC 6 IV

Q21, 6-8 Cycles

Dose dense−TCiv

Dose dense−TCip

Primary Endpoint: PFS Secondary Endpoint: OS, Toxicity, QOL

Accrual Goal: 746 pts / 511 events


Slide33 l.jpg

NCIG CTG OV21 versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline

Patients with EOC

3-4 cycles neoadjuvant chemo

Initial surgery: < 1 cm residual

3 cycles

d1 IV Carbo/Taxol

3 cycles IP/IV

d1 CDDP/Carbo IP and Taxol IV

d8 IP Taxol 60mg/m2

d8 IV Taxol 60mg/m2

Endpoints: PFS and OS


Slide34 l.jpg

Diagnostic biomarkers versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline

Patients diagnosed with EOC

3-4 cycles neoadjuvant chemo

Markers of primary chemoresistance

Primary surgery:> 1 cm residual

Or patient not entered in OV21

Primary surgery:

< 1 cm residual

OV21 patient

No surgery

+/_ progressive disease

Specific markers for IP vs. IV

Disease progression

Markers for acquired chemoresistance


Ovatyon l.jpg
OVATYON versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline

Relapsed ovarian cancer (n=588)

with platinum-free interval (PFI) of 6-12 months

Randomization

(strata: ECOG, Measurable disease, PFI)

PLD 30 mg/m2 1 hour i.v. + Carboplatin AUC 5 30-60 min i.v. on day 1 q4weeks

Up to 6 cycles or progression

PLD 30 mg/m2 1 hour i.v. + Trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2 3 hoour i.v. on day 1 q3weeks

Up to 6 cycles or progression

3rd line chemotherapy: at investigator discretion

3rd line chemotherapy: platinum rechallenge


Slide36 l.jpg

Thank you for attention versus liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan for ovarian cancer patients relapsing following previous platinum therapy and carrying a deleterious germline


ad