1 / 10

9104-003 Report September 17/18, 2013 Seattle, WA

9104-003 Report September 17/18, 2013 Seattle, WA. Team Members. AAQG Will Tate (TL), Triumph Aerostructures Jeff Wood, SAE Editor John Horan, Honeywell Mike Gusha, Lockheed Martin Lisa Greenleaf, TUV USA Linda Price, Boeing Jeffery Long, UTC (Pratt & Whitney) Alex Chong, Plexus

zion
Download Presentation

9104-003 Report September 17/18, 2013 Seattle, WA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 9104-003 ReportSeptember 17/18, 2013Seattle, WA

  2. Team Members AAQG Will Tate (TL), Triumph Aerostructures Jeff Wood, SAE Editor John Horan, Honeywell Mike Gusha, Lockheed Martin Lisa Greenleaf, TUV USA Linda Price, Boeing Jeffery Long, UTC (Pratt & Whitney) Alex Chong, Plexus Reg Blake, IAAR Tony Marino, Boeing Kimberly Spurlock, QUAL-TECH INC. Ron Tarach, QUAL-TECH INC. Adam Maxwell, RABQSA APAQG Shuji Komori, FHI Norikazu Tsuchiya, KHI Shuichi Kitaguci, BSK EAQG • Ian Folland, EAQG-OPMT • Ainhoa Remirez, ITP • Dominique Thiault, Safran • Giuseppe Leoni, AgustaWestland • Andre La Croix, Astrium • UsmanHaq, Goodrich • Chris Hughes, BAe • Claudia Oliveri, AleniaAermacchi • Batia Fontain, Elbit Systems • Francois Dumesnil, BV

  3. Face-to-Face Team Meeting, Minn, MN, July Team met to develop solutions to open issues Finalize requirements for TPA B, AABs, and TPs Develop requirements for Training Developers Develop Competency requirements for AAs and AEAs Define a workable competency evaluation process Clarify ambiguous areas, incorporate applicable resolutions General document clean-up to forward to document editor Develop Competency Validation Process (CVP) Process required consistent implementation Evaluates auditors against auditing (QMS) competency and AS&D Technical Competency) Process developed and Sanctioned under authority of IAQG Retain prerequisites for Audits (20 audit days, Required Training - 60 hours for re-authentication, 2/10 yr in manufacturing, QMS lead auditor certificate)

  4. New Applicant Auditor • AA Authentication • 4 audits comprising 20 on-site auditor days ISO9001-based system audits • 2/10 yrs Manufacturing industry • ISO9001 Lead Auditor course • SMS defined Training/Course(s) • QMS Auditing competence evaluation • AEA Authentication/Work • Experience based • 4 audits comprising 20 on-site auditor days ISO9001-based audits within 3 yrs • SMS defined Training/Course(s) • 2/10 yrs Manufacturing industry • ISO9001 Lead Auditor course • QMS auditing competence evaluation • Technical Competence evaluation

  5. CVP Scoring Criteria • Cumulative Scoring • < 80% = RED • 80 – 89.9% = Yellow • > 89.9% = GREEN • If Green is obtained in all QMS and Technical Competence Areas then: • 5 yrs authentication is awarded • AEA only • Re-authentication • Every 3 yrs • Same criteria as initial authentication • Successful CVP completion • Attendance at 60 hrs of Development training • Same criteria as initial authentication • Suspension / Withdrawal • Not fulfilling 9104-001/003 reqmts • AQMS authentication contains false info • Falsified audit findings • Actions that would bring ICOP into dispute • Not informing AAB of a previous rejection, suspension, or withdrawal from another AAB • Decision for suspension, AAB will determine conditions of suspension • Advancement: AA to AEA • Complete all Technical Competence Improv. Actions • 20 audit days of AQMS audits in past 3 yrs • 60 Hrs of development training • OE of ongoing auditor assessment by CB • Complete CVP for AEA • Advancement does not change re-authentication cycle time/date

  6. Initial Authentication

  7. Additional Items • AABs continue to review auditor submitted applications and documentation • CVP is maintained and managed by the IAQG • AABs will maintain auditor authentication documentation • AABs will review and validate all required documentatin prior to granting authentication • Auditors can only hold authentication at a single AAB at a time • Output of CVP includes feedback on auditor’s improvement areas • CVP can only be repeated every 6 months • AEAs scoring RED in Technical competence, will be re-authenticated for 12 mos (1st time only), 2ndRED scoring results in AA grading

  8. Next Steps • Complete formatting of Aug 2013 Draft by Montreal IAQG Meeting ☺ • Develop detail CVP process and implementation Schedule • Communicate details of new 9104-003 draft to stakeholders • Clarify areas of document that feedback dictates

  9. Questions and Thoughts

More Related