1 / 14

David Asner/LLNL

Resolved Photon Backgrounds to gg Processes. David Asner/LLNL. This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. W-7405-Eng-48. 4 th ECFA/DESY Workshop

ziazan
Download Presentation

David Asner/LLNL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Resolved Photon Backgrounds to gg Processes David Asner/LLNL This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. W-7405-Eng-48. 4th ECFA/DESY Workshop April 1-4, 2003, NIKHEP, Amsterdam

  2. Photons have Structure • Three types of gg collisions • Direct • Once resolved • Twice resolved “g”=0.99 g + .01 r Electroweak Electroweak (DIS) Strong (rr collider)

  3. Recent History • Since SNOWMASS 2001 we have predicted backgrounds due to resolved photons to be “too large” – Telnov • At St.Malo – de Roeck, Moenig, Schulte, Telnov – predict resolved photon background approximately an order of magnitude smaller • At Prague – Asner & de Roeck discovered • Order of magnitude  Factor of 6 • Not at all obvious why this large discrepancy exists • Recently resolved this problem!

  4. Procedure • Set Pythia parameters • Calculate cross sections • Generate Luminosity distributions - CAIN • Use above to generate stdhep output file • Overlay these events in gg physics studies

  5. Resolved Photon Backgrounds:#1 Concern gg collisions are NOT like e+e- 1.5x1010 Primary e-,1x1010 Compton g CAIN also includes e+e- from pair production and real g from beamstrahlung PYTHIA gamma/e- option simulates virtual g associated with e- beam • Approximately 83% of interactions are gg • Approximately 17% of interactions are eg • Approximately 0.4% of interactions are ee

  6. Luminosity: CAIN

  7. ggCross Section: Pythia vs Model

  8. Cross Section: Pythia gg,eg,ee Clearly eg cross section is NOT negligible, nor is luminosity  Must include in future studies

  9. Scenarios • Default Pythia parameters: Most similar to the study by de Roeck, Schulte, Telnov • Preliminary Butterworth parameters: Used in our earlier work. 6x larger background. • Updated Butterworth parameters: http://jetweb.hep.ucl.ac.uk/Fits/322/index.html http://jetweb.hep.ucl.ac.uk/Fits/757/index.html • PARP(67)=4.0 vs 1.0 PARP(91)=1.0 vs 0.0 • PARP(81)=1.8 vs 1.5 PARP(99)=1.0 vs 0.0 • MSTP(82)= 1 vs 4 c2/dof = 4.96 vs 4.97 • Newer fit use ~ ¼ LEP, HERA, Tevatron luminosity • Repeat analysis for Higgs Factory, 500 GeV, type-I&II

  10. # Overlay Events • Recall gg-NLC – rep. rate is 11.4kHz • 1.5e1010 e-/bunch • 95 bunches/train • 120 trains/second • Higgs factory • 6700 overlay events/second • 56 events/train • 0.6 events/crossing • 500 GeV Machine ~3x larger

  11. Occupancy: Tracks Plots correspond to 17000 bunch crossings Cos Q vs Energy (GeV) 3.7 tracks/crossing (|cos Q| < 0.9) Eavg = 0.7 GeV (p > 0.2 GeV)

  12. Occupancy: Showers Plots correspond to 17000 bunch crossings Cos Q vs Energy (GeV) 5.5 showers/crossing (|cos Q| < 0.9) Eavg = 0.4 GeV

  13. Impact on Higgs Reconstruction Higgs  bb (no n + resolved bkgd) Higgs  bb Higgs  bb (no n)

  14. Conclusions • Agreement with de Roeck, Moenig, Schulte, Telnov • Resolved photon backgrounds are weakly dependent on the choice of pythia settings • eg backgrounds are not negligble ~ 20% effect • 0.6 events/crossing at NLC Higgs Factory  1.2 at Tesla • 3.7 tracks/crossing at 0.7 GeV • 5.5 clusters/crossing at 0.4 GeV • Challenges of resolved photon backgrounds appear to be smaller than those due to n • This background to be included in the next iteration of our Higgs analysis – accepted Phys. Rev. D.

More Related