1 / 24

Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse

Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse. 3: Conceptualization and construal operations, pt. 1. 3.1 Introduction. Semantics is conceptualization (Langacker) All linguistic units evoke a semantic frame Human beings employ a variety of construal operations in language

zhen
Download Presentation

Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse 3: Conceptualization and construal operations, pt. 1

  2. 3.1 Introduction • Semantics is conceptualization (Langacker) • All linguistic units evoke a semantic frame • Human beings employ a variety of construal operations in language • Examples: when a language has alternative expressions for the “same” situation (dad/father, spend/waste, leaves/foliage, lives/is living, etc.)

  3. 3.1 Introduction • There is cross-linguistic and language-internal variation as to whether construal plus truth-conditional semantic shift is expressed covertly or overtly. • Coercion – covert (not grammatically obligatory) expression of construal and semantic shift • Conversion – overt (with grammatical markers) expression of construal and semantic shift Example: count vs. mass is covert (coercion) in English, but overt (conversion) in Russian: soloma ‘straw’ vs. solominka ‘a straw’; kričal‘cried’ vs. kriknul ‘cried once’

  4. 3.1 Introduction • Both coercion and conversion involve construal. • Talmy, Langacker (and others) have explored the possible construal operations • Image schemas impose a conceptualization of experience; they are “abstract” because they are schematic, but they are “not abstract” because they are embodied (see list on p. 45) – these relate to the possible (source) domains as well.

  5. 3.1 Introduction • Croft&Cruse (p. 46) suggest a classification of construal operations : • Attention/Salience • Judgement/Comparison (identity) • Perspective/Situatedness • Constitution/Gestalt • These are 4 basic cognitive abilities • They are described in the remainder of the chapter

  6. 3.2 Attention/Salience • Attention includes: • Selecting an object of attention • Having a focus of attention in a scope of attention • Selecting coarse or fine-grained attention • Fixing or shifting attention

  7. 3.2.1 Selection • Selecting something = ignoring the rest • This can involve selecting the appropriate facet or domain of a word (e.g., Paris as a location, government, or population)

  8. 3.2.1 Selection • Q: What is metonymy?

  9. 3.2.1 Selection • Q: What is metonymy? • A: Selection of a different concept profile than the one usually symbolized by a word. The french fries is getting impatient.

  10. 3.2.2 Scope of attention (dominion) • The scope of attention determines what is accessible to attention, what the search domain is. A reference point can determine the scope, as in the possessors in my watch, your anxiety, Lincoln’s assassination.

  11. 3.2.3 Scalar adjustment • Q: What is a quantitative scalar adjustment?

  12. 3.2.3 Scalar adjustment • Q: What is a quantitative scalar adjustment? • A: An adjustment of how coarse or fine-grained a construal is (E.g., along the road, across the road, through the road)

  13. 3.2.3 Scalar adjustment • Q: What is a qualitative scalar adjustment?

  14. 3.2.3 Scalar adjustment • Q: What is a qualitative scalar adjustment? • A: This is adjustment of attention along the range of schematicity, according to superordinate or subordinate categorization.

  15. 3.2.4 Dynamic attention • Q: What is fictive motion?

  16. 3.2.4 Dynamic attention • Q: What is fictive motion? • A: Dynamic construal of a static scene, e.g., The road winds through the valley and then climbs over the high mountains.

  17. 3.2.4 Dynamic attention • Q: What is the difference between sequential and summary scanning?

  18. 3.2.4 Dynamic attention • Q: What is the difference between sequential and summary scanning? • A: Sequential scanning sees something unfold through time (the bridge collapsed); summary scanning sees an event as a whole (the collapse of the bridge)

  19. 3.3 Judgement/comparison • Comparison is a fundamental cognitive function, and has linguistic correlates in categorization, metaphor, and figure-ground alignment.

  20. 3.3.1 Categorization • Categorization can involve full sanction – when an item is clearly a member of a category, or partial sanction – when a member is an extension of a category.

  21. 3.3.2 Metaphor • Q: What is metaphor?

  22. 3.3.2 Metaphor • Q: What is metaphor? • A: Metaphor is a mapping between a source domain and a target domain.

  23. 3.3.3 Figure-ground alignment • Q: What properties are usually associated with figure vs. ground?

  24. 3.3.3 Figure-ground alignment • Q: What properties are usually associated with figure vs. ground? • A: Figure is usually less known, smaller, more mobile, simpler, more salient, and more recent in awareness than ground. Linguistic realizations include main (figure) vs. subordinate (ground) clauses, prepositions.

More Related