2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 30

2008-2009 Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Program PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 42 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

0. 2008-2009 Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Program. Personal Responsibility for Conducting Research and Advancing Your Career. 0 of 5. Choose Now.

Download Presentation

2008-2009 Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0

2008-2009Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Program

Personal Responsibility for Conducting Research and Advancing Your Career


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Choose Now

Which of the following describes best your disciplinary academic affiliation? Please return ResponseCards at the end of the Workshop. Thank You!

  • Arts & Humanities

  • Clinical Programs

  • Education

  • Engineering & other Technical Disciplines

  • Life Sciences

  • Physical Sciences

  • Social Sciences

  • Other Professional Programs

  • Disciplines & Programs not included above


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Mean =

Answer Now

Please indicate the number of years you have been a graduate student, both at MSU and elsewhere for prior studies

  • < 1

  • 1 – 2

  • 2 – 3

  • 3 – 4

  • 4 – 5

  • > 5


What graduate degree are you currently pursing

0 of 5

Answer Now

What graduate degree are you currently pursing?

  • Masters

  • Ph.D.

  • M.D.; D.O.; or D.V.M.

  • Combined Ph.D. / M.D.; D.O.; or D.V.M.

  • Ph.D. in Nursing

  • Other

  • Completed a doctoral degree


How many rcr workshops have you attended including tonight s

0 of 5

Mean =

Choose Now

How many RCR Workshops have you attended, including tonight’s?

  • One

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five

  • Six


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Mean =

Answer Now

How many individuals (Faculty, Postdoctoral Trainees, Academic Technicians & other Graduate Students) work in your work-group?

  • 4 or less

  • 5-6

  • 7-8

  • 9-10

  • 11-12

  • 13-14

  • 15-16

  • 17-18

  • 19-20

  • More than 20


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

I have received a copy of the information sheet and understand that only information collected from ResponseCards by individuals agreeing to participate will be presented to others later.

  • I agree to participate.

  • I do not agree to participate.

  • I do not want to answer this question.


Please assess your personal understanding of the issues and implications of integrity in research

0 of 5

Mean =

Answer Now

Please assess your personal understanding of the issues and implications of integrity in research.

  • One – Extremely Well

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Not at All


Please rate the importance of research integrity as a key personal value in your career

0 of 5

Mean =

Answer Now

Please rate the importance of research integrity as a key personal value in your career.

  • One – Extremely Important

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Not a Personal Key Value at All


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Mean =

Answer Now

Please rate your perceived importance of integrity as a contributor to research success in your career.

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Not Important at All


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Which of the following statements reflects more accurately your views of the relationship between graduate students and their faculty research advisors?

  • Graduate students work FOR faculty.

  • Graduate students work WITH faculty.


Guidelines for integrity in research and creative activities

0

GUIDELINES FOR INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES

  • KEY PRINCIPLES - Integrity in research and creative activities embodies a range of practices that includes:

    • Honesty in proposing, performing, and reporting research

    • Recognition of prior work

    • Confidentiality in peer review

    • Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

    • Compliance with institutional and sponsor requirements

    • Protection of human subjects and humane care of animals in the conduct of research

    • Collegiality in scholarly interactions and sharing of resources

    • Adherence to fair and open relationships between senior scholars and their coworkers


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Honesty in proposing, performing, and reporting research.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Recognition of prior work.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Confidentiality in peer review.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Compliance with institutional and sponsor requirements.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Protection of human subjects and/or humane care of animals in the conduct of research.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Collegiality in scholarly interactions and sharing of resources.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Please rate the integrity of your department / graduate program in regards to – “Adherence to fair and open relationships between senior scholars and their coworkers.”

  • One – Extremely High

  • Two

  • Three

  • Four

  • Five – No Basis for Judging

  • Six - Neutral

  • Seven

  • Eight

  • Nine

  • Ten – Extremely Low


My supervisor has talked with me about these key principles for research integrity

0 of 5

Answer Now

My supervisor has talked with me about these Key Principles for Research Integrity?

  • Yes

  • No


My department has made a clear commitment to these key principles for research integrity

0 of 5

Answer Now

My department has made a clear commitment to these Key Principles for Research Integrity.

  • Strongly Agree

  • Agree

  • Neutral

  • Disagree

  • Strongly Disagree


Guidelines for graduate student advising mentoring

0

GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDENT ADVISING & MENTORING

  • The Academic Unit

    • Prepare & maintain a Graduate Handbook

    • Create opportunities for scholarship within the field

  • The Unit Chair or Director

    • Know MSU’s rules, policies & regulations AND distribute the Graduate Handbook to students

    • Provide advice until the Advisor is selected

    • Monitor student progress

  • The Faculty Advisor

    • Advise students on developing a program plan

  • The Guidance Committee

    • Provide annual written feedback

    • Administer exams in a fair & equitable manner

  • The Graduate Student

    • Learn & adhere to Academic Unit’s & MSU’s rules, policies & regulations

    • Form a guidance committee in a timely manner

    • Keep the faculty advisor and guidance committee apprised on a regular basis


How long did it take for you to form your guidance committee

0 of 5

Answer Now

How long did it take for you to form your guidance committee?

  • 1st Yr. Student – Not yet formed a guidance comm.

  • > 1 Yr. Student - Not yet formed a guidance comm.

  • > 1 Yr. Student - Less than one twelve months

  • > 1 Yr. Student - Twelve to eighteen months

  • > 1 Yr. Student - Eighteen to twenty-four months

  • > 1 Yr. Student - Two to three years

  • > 1 Yr. Student - Three to four years

  • > 1 Yr. Student - More than four years

  • Do not remember


How recently have you received a written evaluation of your professional progress

0 of 5

Answer Now

How recently have you received a written evaluation of your professional progress?

  • Less than 12 months

  • Twelve to eighteen months

  • Eighteen to twenty-four months

  • Two to three years

  • Three to four years

  • More than four years

  • Never


My supervisor has communicated clear expectations about publication and sharing of research results

0 of 5

Answer Now

My supervisor has communicated clear expectations about publication and sharing of research results.

  • Strongly Agree

  • Agree

  • Neutral

  • Disagree

  • Strongly Disagree


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe & know to violate University policies or the Research Integrity Guidelines discussed tonight?

  • Yes

  • No


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Do you believe that having an honor code for graduate students would be useful in promoting the responsible conduct of research? Please return ResponseCards at the end of the Workshop. Thank You!

  • Yes

  • No

  • Not certain


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously? Please return ResponseCards at the end of the Workshop. Thank You!

  • Yes

  • No


2008 2009 responsible conduct of research workshop program

0 of 5

Answer Now

Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously? Please return ResponseCards at the end of the Workshop. Thank You!

  • Yes

  • No


  • Login