Abstract The Group\'s current focus is a universal computational science of knowing based on the semantic modality of computer rewrite systems. Set out in Rowlands\' 2007 World Scientific book Zero to Infinity investigations under way show that this discovery not only
The Group\'s current focus is a universal
computational science of knowing based on
the semantic modality of computer rewrite
systems. Set out in Rowlands\' 2007 World
Scientific book Zero to Infinity investigations
under way show that this discovery not only
provides a fundamental semantic foundation
for universal quantum computation, but is the
likely keystone for a fundamental semantic
foundation for mathematics, quantum physics
the genetic code /molecular biology, neuro-
science and an evolutionary cosmology.
It provides well determined testable models,
some already in agreement with experiment,
which show that the structure of the cosmos,
the genetic code, the human brain and human
language correspond to quantum mechanics
as determined by the generalized nilpotent
Dirac equation see Chapters 19 Natures Code
& 20 Nature\'s Rules and a resolution of the
Bohr/Einstein Quantum/General Relativity
dichotomy, as outlined hereWere Bohr and Einstein both right?
Cybernetics Machine specialist Group chairman
AGM Presentation 16th March 2009
World Scientific book
\'Zero to Infinity\'
defines a testable
For if not, the urs will be incomplete or even wrong.
(1)where E, p, m, t and r are respectively energy, momentum, mass, time, space and the symbols 1, i, i, j, k, i, j, k, are used to represent the respective units required by the scalar, pseudo-scalar, quaternion and multivariate vector groups.
Xi2= 0, but Xi0 specify the quantizations of the experimentally validated particles of the Standard Model of elementary particle physics. To see these go to Group homepages www.bcs.org.uk/cybergroup.htm and at Keywords click on \'the nilpotent Dirac equation\' to see the particle quantizations D(N) defines or see Sheet A provided
so, too, in relation to each newly emergent unique fermion state and its interactions, will an arbitrary relative fixed phase, for, by the criterion of nilpotence, this state corresponds to each newly emergent distinct urssymbol of the infinite alphabet during the urs\'s emergent construction.
Fig. 2 illustrates how the encoding / decoding Fourier transform action (in accord with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (defined by g the Lie algebra of G) actually happens in MRI. It shows the ‘frequency induced signal’ U(1,C) described by the Heisenberg helix of G off resonance losing amplitude (z axis), i.e. thermodynamically decaying due to a transverse relaxation effect, but, remarkably, simultaneously regaining energy due to longitudinal relaxation,
These MRI output wave diffraction patterns illustrate how the encoding / decoding Fourier transform action Figure 2 (in accord with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle defined by g the Lie algebra of G) actual happens in MRI. Heisenberg uncertainty is thus not the obstacle to the computation of this output but its actual means.
It thus appears that the syntactic correctness of a programming language is a necessary but not sufficient condition, which may only guarantee a combinatorial explosion of possible histories/ solutions, where these are in Pauli\'s famous phrase \'not even wrong\' and a sum over histories remains to be calculated as is necessary in quantum renormalization.
And it guarantees, the computation will be canonically labelled as Zuse knew to be crucial, as long ago as the late 1930s, if it is not to be subject to error. A fact Deutsch pointed out in his paper.