The federal budget process effects on child feeding programs
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 34

The Federal Budget Process: Effects on Child Feeding Programs PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 58 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The Federal Budget Process: Effects on Child Feeding Programs. Keith-Thomas Ayoob, EdD, RD, FADA March 2, 2009 School Nutrition Association. Where we came from. NSLA of 1946 General national policy Focus on protecting kids against nutritional deficiencies Outlet for surplus commodities.

Download Presentation

The Federal Budget Process: Effects on Child Feeding Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The federal budget process effects on child feeding programs

The Federal Budget Process:Effects on Child Feeding Programs

Keith-Thomas Ayoob, EdD, RD, FADA

March 2, 2009

School Nutrition Association


Where we came from

Where we came from

  • NSLA of 1946

    • General national policy

    • Focus on protecting kids against nutritional deficiencies

    • Outlet for surplus commodities


Where we came from1

Where we came from

  • Child Nutrition Act of 1966

    • School breakfast established

    • To help meet the nutritional needs of low income families

    • First large-scale entitlement feeding program for children


Where we came from2

Where we came from

  • Dietary Guidelines for Americans of 1995:

    • Standard established for school meals

    • Goal: to minimize risk of chronic diet-related diseases

    • Prevention of more than just nutritional deficiencies

    • Beyond commodities

  • And then………………..


Old problem malnourished kids

Old Problem: “Malnourished Kids”

"MISNOURISHED KIDS"

New Problem:


Brave new world

BRAVE NEW WORLD

  • Kids have food everywhere

  • Kids eat food everywhere

  • Kids got fatter


Brave new world1

BRAVE NEW WORLD

  • “Childhood obesity is the #1 health problem in children”

  • “Today’s kids will have shorter lives than their parents”

  • “SOMEONE is to blame for this…”


Where we need to be

WHERE WE NEED TO BE

  • “Optimal nutrition”

  • Obesity prevention

  • Disease prevention

but there’s just one thing……....


The local wellness policy

…the “local wellness policy”

  • A festival of individualization at the district level

  • Community-driven, parent-focused

  • Budget can conflict with reality

  • Often where philosophy trumps the science


Local policy wish list components include

Local policy “wish list” components include…

  • Organic food

  • Organic local food

  • No sugar

  • No HFCS

  • No gluten

  • No eggs

  • No dairy

  • No peanuts

  • Nothing that could possibly cause an allergy

  • Low-glycemic foods only


What you need one national policy

What you need: ONE NATIONAL POLICY

  • Meets the needs of MOST children

  • Supplies the good stuff

  • Minimizes the bad stuff (excesses, including LNED foods)


What you need one national policy1

What you need: ONE NATIONAL POLICY

  • Keeps up with DGAs without “overachieving”

  • National policy means national funding

  • Can drive reformulation of foods by industry


Why school meals work

Why school meals work

  • Breakfast & lunch participants:

    • 4 X more likely to drink milk

    • Eat more fruits and vegetables

    • Get more calcium & potassium – nutrients of concern

  • Non-participants:

    • More likely to eat LNED snacks & desserts

    • Drink more junk beverages – 4 X more likely

Gordon, et al, JADA 2009


Do they eat breakfast

Do they eat breakfast?

  • Children who eat breakfast…

    • score higher on tests3

    • have better school attendance2

    • have better diets

      • Iron, Zinc, Vitamin A, B Vitamins, Calcium1

    • may be less likely to be overweight

40% of children don’t eat breakfast everyday1

1 General Mills Bell Institute of Health & Nutrition Dietary Intake Research

2 Wahlstrom et al. Top Clin Nutr 1999

3 Murphy et al. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998


How it s working

How it’s working

  • Fresh fruit offered (50% of menus vs. 41%)

    • i.e. an increase of 25%

  • Whole milk decreased by 40%, flavored skim milk increased by 40% -- a GOOD thing


Where you have problems

Where you have problems

  • Competitive foods, especially LNED ones

  • Compliance with national standards

    • Too much sodium

    • Low fiber

    • Too much fat & saturated fat


How often is it the only meal for the day

How often is it “The only meal for the day?”


How communities overachieve

How communities “overachieve”

  • NY and school milk


The federal budget process effects on child feeding programs

February 2, 2006:

“In New York Schools,

Whole Milk Is Cast From the Menu”

  • Also removed (2006):

    • 2% milk

    • 1% chocolate milk

    • All other flavored milk

RESULT: Milk consumption drops 10% in 2006


Flavored milk friend or foe

Flavored milk: Friend or foe?

  • 2763 children 6-11 years

    1125 teens, 12-17 years

  • 3 groups:

    • Non-consumers of flavored milk

    • 0-240 g

    • >240 g

Johnson, R et al, 2002, JADA


Flavored milk

Flavored milk

  • Flavored milk drinkers had:

    • More calcium ~100-150 mg/day

    • No additional intake in added sugars

    • Lower intake of soft drinks/fruit drinks

Johnson, R et al, 2002, JADA


Aap policy statement prevention of pediatric overweight obesity

AAP Policy Statement:Prevention of pediatric overweight & obesity

“Dietary practices should be fostered that encourage moderation rather than overconsumption, emphasizing healthful choices rather than restrictive eating patterns.”


What rds want and where a national standard could help

What RDs want (and where a national standard could help)

  • Update to 2005 DGAs

  • Age-appropriate portions

  • Cut fat and sodium where possible

  • Make participation cool again

  • Address competitive foods


Follow the 2005 dgas

Follow the 2005 DGAs

  • Whole grains

  • Fruits and vegetables (attn: legumes)

  • Low-fat/fat-free milk


Age appropriate portions and calories

Age-appropriate portions and calories

  • Base on age and ACTIVITY level

  • Currently: 1989 REA for active kids


Cut fat sodium

Cut fat & sodium

  • More unprocessed entrees

    • Semi-scratch cooking

  • Work with vendors to drive reformulation

  • Advocate for USDA to lower fat/sodium in commodities

  • Ditch the deep-fries


Make it cool again

Make it cool again

  • Emphasize green aspects of healthier eating

    • Less meat/fat/processed food, more plant-based food

  • Fewer competitive foods mean more participation

  • Emphasize that “kids who eat school meals have healthier diets overall”


Communication research

Communication Research

Journal of the American

Dietetic Association

June 2003


Implications from research

Implications from Research

  • Students and parents: common interests but different information needs

    • Students—“fun,” “cool,” and “not boring”

    • Parents—“quick,” “easy to use,” and “credible”

  • Redefine “fitness,” “healthy eating,” and “health”

  • Facilitate communication between students, parents, and school nutrition personnel


Address competitive foods

Address competitive foods

  • Participation goes up when they’re not around

  • Often a nutritional nightmare

  • Usually an image problem

  • Responsible for a day’s worth of “discretionary calories” just at lunch

  • Keep vending machines to “better-for-you” options


What sna needs most

WHAT SNA NEEDS MOST

  • Legislation for a single national wellness policy

  • Ensure all legislation is FUNDED


Address the role of parents

Address the role of parents

  • Necessary partners with SNA

  • Primary influencers

    • Family meals

    • Expose kids to a wide range of foods

    • Model good eating behavior


Remember the goal

REMEMBER THE GOAL

HEALTHIER CHILDREN


The federal budget process effects on child feeding programs

Keith-Thomas Ayoob, EdD, RD, FADA

Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

718-430-3970 x6412

[email protected]


  • Login