1 / 18

Mechanisms for Providing QoS in IPv6-based Internetworks

Mechanisms for Providing QoS in IPv6-based Internetworks. Jun-Hyun, Moon Computer Communications LAB., Kwangwoon University imp@kw.ac.kr. Introduction to the QoS in the context of IP Networking. QoS(Quality of Service)?? Service Differentiation Bandwidth Guarantee Low Delay Low Jitter

zeke
Download Presentation

Mechanisms for Providing QoS in IPv6-based Internetworks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mechanisms for Providing QoS in IPv6-based Internetworks Jun-Hyun, Moon Computer Communications LAB., Kwangwoon University imp@kw.ac.kr

  2. Introduction to the QoS in the context of IP Networking • QoS(Quality of Service)?? • Service Differentiation • Bandwidth Guarantee • Low Delay • Low Jitter • Low loss

  3. Introduction to the QoS in the context of IP Networking (cont.) • Best-Effort Delivery Model • irrespective of content-type or application requirements. • Simple principle - First Come, First Served (FCFS) • Integrated Services (IntServ) Model • Three service class • Best Effort service – FCFS, ordinary data : default • Guaranteed service – Hard Real-time requirements • Controlled Load service – Soft Real-time requirements • Differentiated Services (DiffServ) Model • ‘Per-Flow-based’ QoS support • ‘Aggregated-Flow-based’ QoS support • Per-Hop-Behavior (PHB)

  4. The Facts • There’s tendency towrds All-IP network: • Fast adoption of IP-based communications for hand-held wireless interfaces. • Users expect access to advanced internet services as if they were on traditional fixed networks.

  5. IPv6 QoS: Generic Issues • IPv6 기본 헤더 구조

  6. High priority IPv6 QoS: Generic Issues(cont.) • Traffic Class bit (8bit) : Class or Priority Identifier • RFC 1881 • 0 ~ 7 : congestion-controlled traffic • 8 ~ 15 : Non-congestion-controlled traffic

  7. IPv6 QoS: Generic Issues(cont.) • QoS Management

  8. IPv6 QoS: Generic Issues(cont.) • QoS Management

  9. IPv6 QoS: Generic Issues(cont.) • Flow Label (20bit) • 송신자 Node에서 할당 • Flow • 송신자 IP 주소와 Non-zero flow label의 조합으로 유일하게 식별 • 같은 Flow에 속하는 모든 Packet들은 the same source address, destination address, and flow label • The source desires special handling by the intervening routers. • Experimental and subject to change

  10. IPv6 QoS: Generic Issues(cont.) • Example

  11. The Mobility Problem • Purposes from the QoS points of view: • Providing the requested services even if the terminal changes its point of attachment to network. • Deal with handovers, change of IP addresses, inter-domain mobility, etc. • Mobile IP problems: • Triangular routing-problem, packets go up and down-stream through different paths. • Frequently path updates: high overhead, high latency, high loss. • Need of CCOA addresses per host. • Use of tunnels which affects QoS provision. • Mobile IPv6: • Solves most of the problems of Mobile IP. • No seamless mobility, frequent path updates which still causes high overhead, latency and loss during handover.

  12. Micro-mobility • Micro-mobility, Domain-mobility, Regional-mobility??? • It manages movement within the same administrative domain. • Advantages of using Micro-mobility with Mobile IP: • Path updates within domain → micro mobility protocol.. • Reduces Mobile IP path updates. • Inter-domain handovers are faster.

  13. Effects of Micro-mobility in QoS • Effects of Micro-mobility in QoS

  14. Using IPv6 for Micro-mobility • IPv6 Advantages. • Micro-mobility protocols can make use of most of the advantages of IPv6 • Using IPv6 within the Micro-mobility domain: • Use of extension headers. • Security. • Auto-configuration. • Tunneling with source address options. • Movement detection. • No tunneling → avoid encapsulation. • QoS extensions (not of use of mm protocol but useful for this duscussion).

  15. Cellular IP • Cellular IP

  16. IPv6 applied to Cellular IP • Changes introduced by using IPv6 on Cellular IP: • Route update packets are included on a IPv6 control header. Route caches are updated with every packet. • Security added for authentication. • Autoconfiguration to obtain COA directly. • No additional IP addresses are introduced. Only IPv6 addressing mechanisms are used. • Route optimization included for IPv6 • QoS aspects: • the same given by using IPv6: performance, flowid, DSCP. • Given by performance improvements on mobility itself. • Cellular IPv6: • <draft-shelby-seamoby-cellularipv6-00.txt>.

  17. So… • Mobile IP provides basic mobility. • Mobile IP has been greatly improved with IPv6(MIPv6) • Micro-mobility protocols optimize mobility. • most of them do not make use of IPv6. “IPv6 can be succesfully applied to existing Micro-mobility protocols to improve their operation.”

  18. But…. • That’s of enough for QoS. • Things needed for our QoS purposes: • Fast handover → IETF mobileIP group, IETF seamoby group. • Minimum packet loss → soft handover. • Bounded impact on delay → Micro-mobility approaches? • Uniform level of service (end to end) → within the same cell → standarized support from the link layer so adaptation can be possible. • QoS service is a contract that the system need to predict, and that’s not possible now. “There’s still a lot of things to do to provide ‘good’ QoS when the terminal is moving”

More Related