1 / 11

Counterarguments in Your Classical Argument Essay

Counterarguments in Your Classical Argument Essay. How to show that you’re always right. A Review . Over time, we have learned that a counterargument : Examines alternative points of view and opposing arguments Notes the advantages and disadvantages of these views

zeke
Download Presentation

Counterarguments in Your Classical Argument Essay

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Counterarguments in Your Classical Argument Essay How to show that you’re always right

  2. A Review • Over time, we have learned that a counterargument: • Examines alternative points of view and opposing arguments • Notes the advantages and disadvantages of these views • Explains why your view is better than others

  3. How Should the Counterargument Be Introduced? • In general, the strategy is to make it clear quickly that this is someone else’s view. Typical introductory strategies include the following: • Many people [believe/argue/feel/think/suppose/etc.] that [state the counter-argument here] • It is often [thought/imagined/supposed/etc.] that [state the counter-argument here][It would be easy to/One could easily] [think/believe/imagine/suppose/etc.] that [state the counter-argument here] • It might [seem/appear/look/etc.] as if [state the counter-argument here]

  4. Another idea… • You can also cite specific writers or thinkers who have expressed a view opposite to your own: • On the other hand, Satrapi shows that... • However, Hughes has written, ...Satrapi demonstrates...

  5. How Should the Rebuttal Be Introduced? • In all cases, the job of the rebuttal is to show the reader that the opposing view is now being answered. Here are some typical strategies. These are generic examples; they work best when tailored to suit the specifics of the individual topic. • What this piece [overlooks/fails to consider/does not take into account] is ... • This work [seems/looks/sounds/etc.] [convincing/plausible/persuasive/etc.] at first, but… • While this book is popular, it is [logical/impractical/artistic etc.] • Although the author’s approach is successful, it suffers from a flaw in its [delivery/application/etc.]

  6. Now Let’s Look At Some Poor Rebuttals… Faulty Factual Assumption, Faulty Analytical Assumption, Faulty Values, and True But Irrelevant

  7. Faulty Factual Assumption • Racism is a thing of the past; therefore, students don’t need to bother with it. • What is wrong with this rebuttal? How could we improve it?

  8. Faulty Analytical Assumption • Learning about racism might make students more racist. • What is wrong with this rebuttal? How could we improve it?

  9. Faulty Values • Who cares if students are racist? • What is wrong with this rebuttal? How could we improve it?

  10. True But Irrelevant • Students are already familiar with racism; they don’t need to study it in school. • What is wrong with this rebuttal? How could we improve it?

  11. Counterargument Exercise!

More Related