Loading in 5 sec....

Average case analysis of randomized quicksortPowerPoint Presentation

Average case analysis of randomized quicksort

- 75 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Average case analysis of randomized quicksort

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Starting on page 156 of Cormen, et al.

- The running time is dominated by the running time in partition procedure
- Each time partition is called, a pivot element is picked
- This element is never included in any future recursive calls to quicksort and partition

- One call to partition takes O(1) time plus an amount of time that is proportional to the number of iterations of the for loop in lines 3-6
- Each iteration performs a comparison in line 4, comparing the pivot element with another element of the array A
- Therefore, if we can count the total number of times that line 4 is executed, we can bound the total time spent in the for loop during the entire execution of quicksort

- Let X be the number of comparisons performed in line 4 of partition over the entire execution of quicksort on an n-element array
- Then the running time of quicksort is O(n+X)
- Proof: the n is from the total number of calls to partition, each requiring a constant number of processing plus the for loop. However, we charge the time to do the for loops to the X term. An “accounting” trick!!

- If we can compute X we’re done
- To do this we must understand when the algorithm compares two elements of the array and when it doesn’t
- For ease of analysis, let’s rename the elements of the array A as z1, z2….zn with zi being the ith smallest element.
- Also define set Zij = {zi, zi+1, …, zj}

- First observe that each pair of elements is compared at most once
- That’s because elements are only compared to the pivot element in any particular call to partition
- That pivot element will never be the pivot element again in any subsequent call to partition

- Our analysis will now use indicator random variables
- Define Xij = I{zi is compared to zj}
- Where we are considering whether the comparison takes place at any time during the execution of the whole quicksort algorithm, not just during any one call to partition

- Since each pair is compared only once, the total number of comparisons performed by the whole quicksort run is

- Only when either zi or zj is the first element within Zij to be picked as a pivot
- That is, if any other element in that interval had been picked first, then zi and zj would never be compared
- So Xij = pr{zi is compared to zj = 2/(j-i+1)
- Summing this give an upper bound of n ln n