1 / 35

Unconscious Influences on Behavior

Unconscious Influences on Behavior. Major Point. We are not always consciously aware of why we do what we do. Facial Feedback. arrangement of facial muscles influences a person’s emotional state and judgments Zajonc et al. (1989)

zaza
Download Presentation

Unconscious Influences on Behavior

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Unconscious Influences on Behavior

  2. Major Point • We are not always consciously aware of why we do what we do

  3. Facial Feedback • arrangement of facial muscles influences a person’s emotional state and judgments • Zajonc et al. (1989) • subjects read stories that either did or did not have many words with “u” sound • rated stories with “u” sound as less pleasant and less well-liked

  4. Subliminal Perception • there have been a number of widely circulated but fraudulent claims of subliminal perception

  5. Subliminal Advertising • late 1950s • movie theater in Fort Lee, NJ • advertising executive arranged to have “Eat Popcorn” and “Drink Coke” shown for 1/3 of a millisecond every 5 seconds during every film for 6 weeks • claimed that coke sales went up 18%; popcorn sales went up 58% • executive later admitted that he had faked data to save his then-failing ad agency

  6. Subliminal Advertising • Key (1973) • published Subliminal Seduction • argued that advertisers were routinely using sexually suggestive subliminal messages to get consumers to buy products • example: hidden image of a nude woman superimposed on the ice cubes in a glass of scotch

  7. Back Masking • Hutchins--early 1980s, minister in Hot Springs, AR • claimed that Satanic messages were being inserted into recordings of popular music • audible if records were played backwards • if played forwards, “back masked” messages supposedly entered unconscious, causing person to do immoral things

  8. The Evidence • no well-conducted studies have ever found any behavioral effects of back-masked or hidden messages

  9. A Caveat • people do “see” or “hear” what they interpret as “hidden messages” when presented with any relatively complex stimulus • “I saw Satan” is heard by some listeners when Lewis Caroll’s Jabberwocky is played backward, even though no back-masked message has been inserted • probably reflects confirmation bias

  10. Question • If subliminal advertising and back masking don’t work, are there other forms subliminal perception?

  11. Answer • people can have emotional responses to stimuli they are not aware of having seen/heard • people often know more about a stimulus than they believe

  12. Emotional Responses • Kunst-Wilson & Zajonc (1980) • used tachistoscope to show subjects polygons for 1 millisecond (subliminal duration) • showed subjects pairs of polygons--1 they had previously seen and 1 new polygon (nonsubliminal duration) • asked subjects • which one have you seen before? • which one do you like better?

  13. Kunst-Wilson & Zajonc (1980) • question #1: subjects picked previously seen polygon 48% of time • question #2: subjects picked previously seen polygon 60% of time • subjects liked the previously seen polygon better • subliminal mere exposure effect

  14. Emotional Responses (continued) • Lazarus & McCleary (1951) • conditioned subjects to have an emotional response to nonsense syllables (VUS) by paring syllables with electric shock • used tachistoscope to show subjects emotionally conditioned syllables and neutral syllables (at subliminal durations) • found that subjects had higher GSRs to emotionally conditioned syllables (even when they couldn’t accurately identify syllables)

  15. What You Think You Know • Blackwell (1952) • presented subjects with dim and very brief light in 1 of 4 quadrants on screen • asked subjects to identify location of light • if initial response was wrong, asked subject to guess again • probability of subsequent correct response was better than chance • subjects “knew” more than they thought they did

  16. Summary Thus Far: • it is possible to make accurate judgments and be influenced by stimuli that are below the subjective threshold for perception, but above the objective threshold for perception • objective threshold: level of presentation at which subject has obtained no information about stimulus • subjective threshold: level of presentation at which subject believes he has obtained no information about an event

  17. Cognitive Dissonance • People prefer that their beliefs and behavior are consistent • When behavior conflicts with a belief, people find this to be unpleasant (experience dissonance) • People want to eliminate dissonance • In many cases, people will change a belief to make it consistent with behavior

  18. Festinger & Carlsmith (1959) • Method • subjects lined wooden spools up on tray and turned pegs on board • subjects rated interest level of task (-5 to 5) • 1/3 subjects were asked to create “positive expectancy” for next subject, were paid 1$, and re-rated task • 1/3 of subjects were asked to create “positive expectancy” for next subject, were paid 20$, re-rated task

  19. Results • control subjects = -.45 • $20 subjects = -.05 • $1 subjects = 1.35 • Interpretation • 1$ subjects experienced dissonance • behavior (telling next subject study was interesting) was inconsistent with belief (study was dull) • lacked sufficient justification for behavior (only paid $1) • had to revise belief to make it consistent with behavior

  20. Zimabardo et al. (1965) • Method • army reservists asked to rate “survival foods” • rated fried grasshopper negatively • 1/2 soldiers are asked to eat grasshopper by warm, friendly, likeable officer • 1/2 soldiers are asked to eat grasshopper by cold, distant, unfriendly officer • then asked to re-rate grasshopper

  21. Result • ratings of subjects in “unfriendly officer” group were much higher than “friendly officer” group • Interpretation • subjects in “unfriendly officer” group had experienced dissonance • behavior (eating grasshopper) was inconsistent with belief (grasshopper is gross) and they lacked sufficient justification for doing it • had to change belief to bring it in line with behavior

  22. The End of the World As We Know It • Festinger et al. (1956) • infiltrated group of people led by “Marion Keech” • Mrs. Keech received messages from aliens that world would end on Dec. 21 • group of believers would be picked up by flying saucer at midnight on Dec. 20 • many followers quit their jobs and sold all their possessions

  23. midnight came; nothing happened • at 4:45 a.m., Mrs. Keech had a new vision • world had been spared because of the impressive faith of her group • follow-up indicated there was virtually no change in the acceptance of her teachings • only 2 of 11 abandoned group • degree to which group attempted to attract other followers substantially increased after Dec. 21

  24. Justification of Investment • aka justification of effort • The more effort, time, money etc. that you have put into obtaining something, the better you will like it • probably explains effectiveness of Greek hazing and military boot camp in turning new recruits into loyal members

  25. Necessary Conditions • People have to perceive that they had some degree of choice in their behavior • Belief has to have some real world consequences

  26. Other examples of unconscious influences on behavior • Memory • explicit memory: knowledge that can be intentionally retrieved • implicit: memories of events that influence us, but that we cannot intentionally recall • can detect implicit memory using stem completion task • Patients with Korsakoff’s Syndrome • show deficits in explicit memory, but not implicit memory

  27. Priming • Marcel (1983) • Method • presented subjects with 3-word sequence • example: tree-palm-hand • dependent variable was lexical decision time for “hand” • Results • if “palm” was presented supraliminally, it increased the lexical decision time for “hand” • if “palm” was presented subliminally, it decreased the lexical decision time for “hand”

  28. Priming (continued) • Groeger (1988) • Method • first showed subjects a word • depending on condition, word was either at subliminal duration (subject could obtain no conscious info. about word) or supraliminal (just long enough for subjects to obtain partial info. about word) • then showed subjects a list that didn’t actually contain the first word • asked subjects which word on list was the one they were first shown

  29. Groeger (continued) • Results • if first word was shown supraliminally, subjects chose a word that was similar in structure • if first word was shown subliminally, subjects chose a word that was similar in meaning • Found similar results for auditory stimuli • if first word was presented supraliminally, subjects chose a word that was similar in sound • if first word was presented subliminally, subjects chose a word that was similar in meaning

  30. Unconscious Influences on Social Behavior • Lewicki (1986) • Method • during a preexperimental interview, subject was either insulted by the interviewer or treated in a neutral manner • subjects were then asked to go into another room and select whichever of two experimenter was free to administer the rest of the experiment • because both experimenters were actually free, subjects had to make a choice about which experimenter to choose • one of the two experimenters physically resembled the interviewer who had insulted the subject

  31. Lewicki (continued) • Results • 80% of subjects who had previously been insulted chose the experimenter who did not look like the interviewer • 43% of subjects who had not been insulted choose the experimenter who did not look like the interviewer • in a subsequent questionnaire, almost all subjects indicated that their choice was completely random

  32. Conclusions • Many pop psych claims about subliminal perception have not been supported by research • Research has shown that we are not always consciously aware of the reasons why we do what we do

  33. Research-supported examples of unconscious information processing • People can have emotional responses to stimuli that they are not aware of having been exposed to • conditioned response to nonsense syllables • People can know more about a stimulus than they think they do • dots of light in visual quadrant

  34. Summary (continued) • People will often change their beliefs to make them consistent with behavior, especially if they lack sufficient justification for their behavior • cognitive dissonance • People can be influenced by stimuli they can’t remember having been exposed to • implicit memory

  35. Summary (continued) • A stimulus can have different effects depending on whether it is presented subliminally or supraliminally • lexical decision time • choice of word that is similar in meaning vs. structure • Previous experience can have an unconscious influence on social behavior • subjects who were insulted by the interviewer

More Related