1 / 40

Social Capital, Social Agency and Sustainability

Social Capital, Social Agency and Sustainability. Chris Ling Ann Dale: Canada Research Chair in Sustainable Community Development Royal Roads University. Social capital?.

zarifa
Download Presentation

Social Capital, Social Agency and Sustainability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Social Capital, Social Agency and Sustainability Chris Ling Ann Dale: Canada Research Chair in Sustainable Community Development Royal Roads University

  2. Social capital? “The set of norms, networks, and organizations through which people gain access to power and resources, and through which decision-making and policy formation occur” (Grootaert, 1998) Grootaert, C. 1998. Social Capital: The Missing Link? Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 3. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  3. Social capital? • Reciprocity • Trust • Networks • Bonding • Strong • Weak • Bridging

  4. Measuring Social Capital What are the social parameters that impact social capital? Onyx, J. and Bullen, P, 2000

  5. Measuring Social Capital • What doesn’t seem to be important: • Political position and faith in federal Government • Contractual arrangements (general trust is much more significant) • The position of the individual without consideration of the social context. Onyx, J. and Bullen, P, 2000

  6. Measuring Social Capital • What is important: • Participation – involvement in community activities • Trust and Safety – do people trust their neighbours, do they feel safe on their streets? • Connections – Neighbourhoods (casual contacts), Families and Friends (more intimate contacts), Work (feeling part of a team) • Tolerance of Diversity – a feeling that variety enhances rather than detract from life • Value of Life – Am I valued by my community? Onyx, J. and Bullen, P, 2000

  7. Measuring Social Capital • AND MOST IMPORTANT • Social Agency – a sense of personal and collective efficacy • I and my community CAN make a difference

  8. Social Agency – key questions • Are agency, social capital and sustainable community development related to each other? • Can agency be measured? • Are there key actors or connectors who facilitate bridging and networking? • How do they perceive their role in the network? • What are the patterns of leadership and are they critical to bridging and vertical capital? • Does membership in overlapping networks give greater agency to a community?

  9. How are Canadian communities doing? Survey examining the connections between liveability, social capital, agency and sustainable communities

  10. Who is answering our survey? Broad age range Gender bias towards women 15-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 >55 Higher than average education High Post-high Degree Post-grad

  11. Who is answering our survey? Total approx 2500 respondents Higher than average income Huge geographic spread – every corner of Canada, all provinces, all major centers Fair split between urban and rural Rural Semi-rural Suburban Urban

  12. Are our communities accessible? Bicycle Walk Public Transit N/A < 15 mins. to 1 hr. 3 hrs. > 3 hrs. 2 hrs. N/A < 15 mins. to 1 hr. 3 hrs. > 3 hrs. 2 hrs. Drive Carpool N/A < 15 mins. to 1 hr. 3 hrs. > 3 hrs. 2 hrs. People will walk if they can

  13. Are our communities accessible? Locations Walked at Least Once/Week Percent * Multiple choices permitted Response

  14. Are our communities accessible? Locations Walked at Least Once/Week Rural POs – vital part of the social infrastructure Percent

  15. Are our communities accessible? Locations we have access to in our community Percent

  16. Are our communities accessible? Accessibility of Public Transit Polarised opinions – transit is either good or bad 31.1% 25.5% 16.3% Frequency 13.5% 7.6% 1.6% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Disagree Don’t Know Response

  17. Are our communities safe? Perceived Safety of Neighbourhood 54.7% 31.9% Frequency 7.8% 3.4% 0.4% Strongly Agree Agree Neither Disagree Strongly Disagree Response

  18. Are our communities safe? Generally yes – but less so the more urban you are

  19. Are our communities safe? Main Safety Concerns Percent Response Reality divorced from perception – crime, especially violent crime is decreasing – potential for problems from pollution and traffic accidents is increasing – and higher than crime

  20. Sense of belonging - trust and networks? volunteer services litter help trust connected Feeling connected Feeling connected Trust in service and infrastructure Pick up litter Helping others = helping yourself Most people can be trusted Aware of volunteer opportunities

  21. Do we feel part of our communities? Generally yes – but less so the more urban you are

  22. Do you trust your services and infrastructure? Generally yes – Canadian communities have a high level of trust

  23. Do you trust other people? Generally yes – Canadian communities have a high level of trust

  24. Social networks? People are engaged socially – but not necessarily formally Social engagements Organised sports Often Sometimes Rarely Never 0 1 2-3 3-5 >5 Organised religion We are sociable creatures, but religion increasingly not important for developing them Often Sometimes Rarely Never

  25. Social networks? How often do you run into friends whilst shopping? Often Sometimes Rarely Never The limited services of rural areas mean casual acquaintance is more common – is this linked to trust and safety? Often Sometimes Rarely Never

  26. Value and belonging It is family and friends that people turn to

  27. Value and belonging But in general people feel valued by colleagues as well – not so much by neighbours

  28. Action! Have you ever initiated a community-based response to an emerging issue in your neighbourhood? Have you taken part in a Community project in the last three years? Canadians are engaged in their communities to a high degree -

  29. Action! Involvement in collective action, e.g. writing a letter of protest, march or demonstration? Often Sometimes Rarely Never Often Sometimes Rarely Never But perhaps more so in rural areas? Often Sometimes Rarely Never Often Sometimes Rarely Never

  30. How are Canadian communities doing? Survey examining the connections between liveability, social capital, agency and sustainable communities

  31. Case studies • Community response to watershed logging – Salt spring Island • United We Can – Downtown Eastside Vancouver

  32. Salt Spring Island Residents of Salt Spring Island acted to protect an area of forest watershed that was being clear cut by a small private logging company. Aerial photo, Mt. Tuam, July 2000. Photo: Osman Phillips

  33. Salt Spring Island Social Capital: Photo from the ‘Salt Spring Women Preserve and Protect' calendar 2001 • Many groups linked together – combination of weak and strong bonds. • Some key individuals (leaders) bringing groups together – bridging.

  34. Salt Spring Island Social Agency: • Variety of tactics reflecting different groups • Raised publicity • Gained support of more formal organisations from elsewhere • Resulted in increased capacity for the community to act www.amnestyusa.org

  35. Salt Spring Island Sustainable Community Development: • 665 ha of land purchased • Watershed and rare ecosystem protection • Protection of natural and cultural capital

  36. United We Can: Downtown Eastside Vancouver In 5 years a group of binners developed a $1.6 million pa revenue recycling business. Employing 33 full-time previously unemployed people and has contact with 700-750 street people a day Photo: United We Can

  37. United We Can: Downtown Eastside Vancouver Social Capital: • Key individuals with strong social bonds came together to start the creation of a network. • The bridging capital between the strong network and the wider population leads to the success. • Social capital allowed the leverage and exploitation of municipal and provincial resources and grants Ken Lyotier – CEO United we Can

  38. United We Can: Downtown Eastside Vancouver Social Agency: • Formalized previously existing activity • Community led and driven • Strong belief in the possibility of change Ken Lyotier – CEO United we Can

  39. United We Can: Downtown Eastside Vancouver Sustainable Community Development: • 50,000 bottles a day are recycled that would otherwise be land filled • Giving hundreds of marginalized people a legitimate economic outlet • Provides a network, sense of community and safe environment for personal recovery of mental and physical well-being Photo: United We Can

  40. How are Canadian communities doing? Survey examining the connections between liveability, social capital, agency and sustainable communities

More Related