1 / 26

Information Sharing Standards and Architecture

Information Sharing Standards and Architecture. Topics for Discussion. Interoperability Data Standards XML Web Services SOA. Frame of Reference. Use Cases State Magistrate Arrest Warrants Local Sheriff Booking-In process Juvenile Detention Entry Process

zanna
Download Presentation

Information Sharing Standards and Architecture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Information Sharing Standards and Architecture

  2. Topics for Discussion InteroperabilityData StandardsXMLWeb ServicesSOA

  3. Frame of Reference • Use Cases • State Magistrate Arrest Warrants • Local Sheriff Booking-In process • Juvenile Detention Entry Process • Federated Search of Terrorism Watch Lists • Citizen Complaints • There exists and 80% probability that most organizations will have migrated to a • Service Oriented Architecture by 2008. Those who do not will be paying a very • high premium to boutique contractors to integrate with existing legacy systems.” • -Mike Belchar , Research Analyst with Gartner

  4. Presidential Executive Order 13356

  5. MCOE Activities • Information Sharing and Liaison Services • Support and populate metadata registry/repository • Support and populate data source registration • Standards and Policies Development • Develop and revise MCOE standards for: • Metadata discovery, modularity, reuse, integration, … • Develop and revise MCOE policies for: • Governance, Data stewardship, Metadata registration, … • Standards Testing and Prototyping • Applied research – test implications of multiple standards • Conduct proof-of-concept experiments • Architect and test for scalability and security for: • Cross federated queries

  6. MCOE Activities • Registry, Catalog and Middleware Services • Establish final COTS Metadata registry • Establish enterprise data source catalog • Future Enterprise Software • Justice Information Exchange Model (JIEM) Server • Enterprise Taxonomy Server • Analysis Tools • Education and Outreach Services Support • Training about technical metadata registry/repository & data sharing concepts • Enterprise Metadata Modeling Services • Support the adoption of the DHS DRM by other organizations. • Implement a federated query model

  7. Solution(What is Core?) Working with the Core.gov initiative to ensure that these core elements are applicable across the entire Federal Government. (FEA DRM)

  8. Universal Core

  9. Why SOA, XML Data Standards and Web Services for the NCR?

  10. Types of Interoperability

  11. OWL Minis/Micros WWW Web Services Intelligence Built into the Data Age of Semantic Models Age of Programs Age of Proprietary Data Age of Open Metadata Age of Open Data Text, Office Docs, Databases – Proprietary Schemas Namespaces, Taxonomies, RDF Ontologies & Inference Program Data HTML, XML – Open Schema 1945-1970 1970-1994 1994-2000 2000-2003 2003- Procedural Programming Object Oriented Programming Model Driven Programming “Data isas important as code” “Data ismore important than code” “Data isless important than code” Mike Daconta DHS Metadata Program Manager

  12. Service Oriented Architecture

  13. Exchange packages Data Elems Data Elems Registry Core Context Information Sharing Architecture COI Context 3 Publish & Discover 2 Assemble Exchange Packages 1 Build Components Org 2 Org 1

  14. Data Exchange within the National Capital RegionA proposed vision for data interoperability within a Service Oriented Architecture

  15. Vision • Provide a real-time interactive system designed to strengthen the flow of information between government functions within the National Capital Region • Provide a collaborative communications environment, through which member jurisdictions collect and disseminate information between themselves and with federal and state agencies : • Chat rooms • Threaded discussions • Virtual Field Offices • Web Service Registry/Repository and XML • Federated Searching capabilities

  16. LEAD FUNCTION LEAD State 1 Fed Partner 1 State 2 Concept of Operations for a Data Exchange Solution COI 1 COI 3 Information Exchange Portal SECURITY App1 Security All Other COIs COI 4 SECURITY App 5 App2 App3 GIS SECURITY SECURITY App4 SECURITY Fed Partner 2 COI 5 COI 8 CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAM State 2

  17. Data Exchange within the COG Where do we start?Web Services/ GIS/ Federated Identity Management

  18. Identify Exchange PackageMap & Transform Data Build Components

  19. Web Service Payload - XML

  20. Presentation Tier Component Tier Back-Office Tier Assemble Componentswithin an Organization Client Tier COI Portal ApplicationServers COI 1 Mainframes Browser COI 2 COI ApplicationInfrastructure WebServers GIS Maps WebEOC Status Boards Databases Enterprise Service Bus IntegrationInfrastructure Emergency Mgmt Framework/Enterprise Service Bus Federated Search Engine Intelligent Routing XSLT - GJXDM Transformation WebServices Multiple Protocols COI Service 2 COI Service 1 COI X Future Service Additions Alerting Service COI Service 3 Federated Identity Components

  21. Other Regional Agencies Other Federal, State, Local Agencies EOCs ESFs MD Participants Information Exchange Portal VA Participants DEH DEH DEH DHS MCO MRR GIS – EMMA, DHS COG Weather COI 2 COI 3 NEWS Feeds DHS JRIES WS WS WS WS DC Assemble Components Across Organizations Federated Buses Federal Participants Internet Wireless Broadband Security? Security? Security? Security? ??? Integrated DEH COI 2 Security? Security? Security? COI 5 COI 2 COI 2 COI 5 COI 5

  22. Discover Registered and Vetted Web Services Information Exchange through Web Services Data Exchange Hub • Jurisdiction 1 • Police Stations by Location • Hospitals by Location • First Responder Personnel by Role • Significant Events by Location • Jurisdiction 2 • Police Stations by Location • Hospitals by Location • First Responder Personnel by Role • Significant Events by Location • … • Integrated Services • Map Service for NCR

  23. Registered and Vetted Web Services

  24. Result – Integrated Incident Information

  25. NCR Enterprise Architecture (HTTP://WWW.FEAPMO.GOV) • Business Reference Model (BRM) • Lines of Business • Agencies • Customers/Partners Business-DrivenApproach • Data Reference Model (DRM) • Business-focused data standardization • Cross-Agency Information exchanges Information Architecture • Application Reference Model (ARM) • Capabilities • Functionality • Technical Reference Model (TRM) • IT Services • Standards

  26. Implications of Standards for GIS Committee Goals and Objectives • An integrated Map of the NCR with a few high value – low issue layers (ie. Minimum Essential Data Elements). • Definition of a Federated Identity Management System • NIEM Based Web Services • A Web Services Directory for publishing and discovering the individual Web Services produced by participating jurisdictions • Investigate the capabilities of Enterprise Service Buses

More Related