Web 2.0 Palooza

1. Web 2.0 Palooza Dr. Laura Sheneman Harlingen CISD Dr. Holly Weimar Sam Houston State University Department of Library Science

2. Information • Education/Information – Past • Information was accessed by a few, well educated people • Was a process of assuring that knowledge was learned and remembered • Being educated meant you had a great amount of information in your memory • Education/Information – Now • Information is available to all who have digital access • Includes skills to find, navigate, access, decode, evaluate, and organize information Redefining Literacy 2.0 by David Warlick 2009

3. If all our childrenlearn to do is read, they will NOT be literate. Redefining Literacy 2.0 by David Warlick 2009 Redefining Literacy 2.0 by David Warlick 2009

4. Let’s examine the information available to our students.

5. Definitions • Web 1.0 (approx. 1990-2000) • Web 2.0 (coined in 1999, approx. 2000-now) • Web 3.0 (?guesstimates 2015?)

6. Definitions • Web 1.0 (approx. 1990-2000) • "read-only web“ • allowed us to search for information and read it • establish an online presence and make their information available to anyone at any time • focused on companies/corporations • Web 2.0 • Web 3.0

7. Definitions • Web 1.0 (approx. 1990-2000) • Web 2.0 (coined in 1999, approx. 2000-now) • “read-write web” • allows users to interact and collaborate in a social media setting • focused on communities • Web 3.0(?guesstimates 2015?)

8. Definitions • Web 1.0 (approx. 1990-2000) • Web 2.0 (coined in 1999, approx. 2000-now) • Web 3.0 (?guesstimates 2015?) • "read-write-execute“ • the portable, personal web • focused on individual • allow the user to sit back and let the Internet do all of the work for them • the search acts like a personal assistant knowing your preferences/ likes and dislikes

9. Information overload!

10. What our children know will beless important than what they know what to do with it. Redefining Literacy 2.0 by David Warlick 2009

11. -sa -sa Overview Bloom’s Original Taxonomy

12. -sa -sa Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy

13. Verbs Associated With Bloom’s Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) • Creating - designing, constructing, planning, producing, inventing, devising, making • Evaluating - Checking, hypothesizing, critiquing, Experimenting, judging, testing, Detecting, Monitoring • Analyzing - Comparing, organizing, deconstructing, Attributing, outlining, finding, structuring, integrating • Applying - Implementing, carrying out, using, executing • Understanding - Interpreting, Summarizing, inferring, paraphrasing, classifying, comparing, explaining, exemplifying • Remembering- Recognizing, listing, describing, identifying, retrieving, naming, locating, finding Lower Order Thinking Skills (LOTS)

14. How do we tie in H.O.T.S. to the digital landscape of education?

15. http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/file/view/bloom%27s+Digital+taxonomy+v3.01.pdfhttp://edorigami.wikispaces.com/file/view/bloom%27s+Digital+taxonomy+v3.01.pdf

16. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#Introduction and Background:-Bloom's Domains of learning

17. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#Introduction and Background:-Bloom's Domains of learning

18. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#Introduction and Background:-Bloom's Domains of learning

19. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#Introduction and Background:-Bloom's Domains of learning

20. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#Introduction and Background:-Bloom's Domains of learning

21. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#Introduction and Background:-Bloom's Domains of learning

22. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#Introduction and Background:-Bloom's Domains of learning

23. http://www.usi.edu/distance/bdt.htmThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Author: Samantha Penney, sdpenney@usi.edu

24. http://visualblooms.wikispaces.com/ Created and Compiled by Michael Fisher http://digigogy.comAttribution Share Alike cc by-sa

25. Web 2.0 overload!! Low- threshold Technologies So, how do we weed through them?

26. Low-Threshold Technologies • Low Threshold Application is defined as a "teaching/learning application of information technology that is: • reliable • accessible • easy to learn • non-intimidating • and (incrementally) inexpensive ..for purchase, training, support, and maintenance" Sounds perfect for education. Gilbert, S. W. (February 2, 2002). The beauty of low threshold applications. Syllabus. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from www.tltgroup.org/gilbert/Columns/Syllabus.htm

27. Top 10 Web 2.0 Tools 226 respondents Spring 2011 Score Range 5-30

28. Remember, an earlier definition…. • Web 2.0 (coined in 1999, approx. 2000-now) • “read-write web” • allows users to interact and collaborate in a social media setting • focused on communities

29. Wordle

30. Wordle http://www.wordle.net/

31. Wordle • “A ‘Wordle’ enables you to see how frequently words appear in a given text, or see the relationship between a column of words and a column of numbers. • You can tweak your word ‘clouds’ with different fonts, layouts, and color schemes.” http://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/page/Wordle.html

32. Size of a word is Proportional • “The size of a word is proportional to the quantity associated with that word, which, in the case of free text, is the word count.”http://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com/manyeyes/page/Wordle.html

33. You Need Text to “Copy & Paste”

34. Charlotte’s Web

35. The Battle of the Alamo

36. Plant Cells

37. Glogster

38. http://www.glogster.com/

42. Link out to interactive web map Link out to voicethread Link out to glogster on Armstrong Link out to web article Link out to wikipedia article used

43. Google Word-processing

48. Diigo

49. http://www.diigo.com/