1 / 31

Sexual Content in the Media

Sexual Content in the Media. Research. U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (1970). The Report found no statistical evidence “that exposure to explicit sexual materials plays a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior among youth or adults”.

Download Presentation

Sexual Content in the Media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sexual Content in the Media

  2. Research

  3. U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (1970) • The Report found no statistical evidence “that exposure to explicit sexual materials plays a significant role in the causation of delinquent or criminal behavior among youth or adults”

  4. Malamuth and Check • “The Effects of Mass Media Exposure on Acceptance of Violence against Women” (1981)

  5. Hypothesis • Sexual content combined with violence and transformation (a favorable outcome) will be correlated with acceptance of violence against women as shown by scores on the AIV Scale (Acceptance of Interpersonal Violence) and the RMA Scale (Rape Myth Acceptance) • Attitude and belief change

  6. Design • 271 students at the University of Manitoba • All films shown in the campus film series • 2 experimental films (R rated, not pornography) • “Swept Away” • “The Getaway” • 2 control films (romance w/o violence) • “A Man and a Woman • “Hooper” • AIV and RMA given 1 week following the films

  7. Findings • Male students who saw the experimental films scored higher on the AIV and RMA (but not statistically significant on the RMA)

  8. Donnerstein and Berkowitz • “Victim Reactions in Aggressive erotic Films as a Factor in Violence against Women” (1981)

  9. Hypothesis • {Sex + violence + positive outcome} will be correlated with male subjects’ willingness to aggress against women • Behavior change

  10. Design • Male subjects are asked to write a short essay • Essay is evaluated by a research confederate (RC) which the subjects believe is another subject • All are angered by a negative evaluation of 9 electric shocks • Ss see films • G1 sees a neutral film (talk show) • G2 sees a purely erotic film • G3 sees {sex + violence + positive outcome} • G4 sees [sex + violence + negative outcome] • Ss are given an opportunity to evaluate RC

  11. Results • No significant increased aggression against female RC in G1 and G2 subjects • Significant aggression against female RC in G3 and G4 subjects • No significant aggression against male RC

  12. Follow Up Experiment • Same design, except only half of the Ss are angered • All RC’s are female

  13. Results • G1 subjects do not engage in aggression against female RC’s • G2 subjects do not engage in aggression against female RC’s • G4 subjects do not engage in aggression against female RC’s • Only G3 subjects [angered, positive outcome + sex + violence] show increased aggression against female RC’s

  14. Zillman and Bryant • “Pornography, Sexual Callousness and the Trivialization of Rape” (1982)

  15. Research Question: Effects of Continued Exposure to Pornography • Ss were 80 M and 80 F students at IU • 3 experiments groups saw X-rated (but non-violent films over 6 weeks • G1 saw 6 erotic films (4 hours: 48 minutes) • G2 saw 3 erotic films (2:24) and 3 neutral films • G3 saw 6 neutral films (4:48) • G4 saw no films

  16. Results • G1 subjects overestimated the % of adults engaged in uncommon sex practices • Group sex (3X) • Sadomasochism (2X) • G1 Ss recommended a lighter sentence for a convicted rapist—4 years vs 8 years (trivialization of rape by both M and F Ss) • G1 Ss showed less support for feminist values than other groups • G1 Ss scored higher on the Sexual Callousness Toward Women Scale than other groups

  17. Linz, Donnerstein and Penrod • “Physiological Desensitization and Judgments about Female Victims of Violence” (1984-1989)

  18. First Study—”Slasher” Films • Ss prescreened for hostility and psychosis using the Symptom Checklist 90 • Ss see “TX Chainsaw Massacre” • Ss take the MAACL (Multiple Affect Adjective Check List) • On 4 successive days, Ss see 4 more slasher films and re given the MAACL • On day 6 Ss are shown a rape trial and given a questionnaire

  19. Results • Continued exposure to [sex + violence] leads to desensitization (reported on the MAACL) • Decreasing awareness of the extent of violence • Decreasing awareness of how the F victims of violence are degraded • Increasing enjoyment • Ss response to the questionnaire reflected their belief that the rape victim was less injured

  20. New Study • Penrod leaves the research and Adams joins the research

  21. RQ: Is sex or violence more important in attitude formation • Prescreening (SCL 90 and RMA) • Video 1 • G1 Ss see non-violent erotic and exciting film clips • G2 Ss see “slasher” films • MAACL given • Video 2 (violence against F) • MAACL given again • Questionnaire about video 2

  22. Results • G1 Ss report normal and expected mood change after video 2 on the MAACL • Hostility toward aggressor • Anxiety • Aggression • G2 Ss do not report normal mood changes • On the questionnaire, G Ss see the victim a • Less injured • Less worthy of sympathy • More responsible for the attack

  23. Interpretation • Sex alone is not the problem • Sex + violence is the problem

  24. Canadian Fraser Committee Report (1985) • The Report found no conclusive evidence that there was a causal relationship between sexually explicit material and sexual offenses. However, it accepted the feminist position and held that some pornography (sexually violent) was a denial of equality under Canadian law

  25. U.S. Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography (1986) • “Finding a link between aggressive behavior towards women and sexual violence . . . Requires assumptions not found exclusively in the experimental evidence . . . . We see no reason, however, not to make these assumptions. . . . They are also to all of us assumptions that are plainly justified by our own common sense.”

  26. Zilllman and Bryant • “Effects of Prolonged Consumtion of Pornography on Family Values” (1988)

  27. Design • 160 Ss (M, F, student, non-student) • Experimental group saw 1 hour of non-violent porn. Purchased from a local video store and edited to 1 hour) over 6 weeks • Control group saw 6 hours of situation comedy • The experiment took place over 6 weeks • Ss were given the Value of Marriage Survey

  28. Results • E Ss were more accepting that controls of premarital sex, extramarital sex, extra co-habitational sex, etc. • Males were more accepting that females • E Ss perceptions of the importance of faithfulness were lower that C Ss • E Ss had less desire for children • E Ss were more accepting of male dominance

  29. Mundorf et al. (2007)“Effects of Sexually Explicit Media” • Researchers did a meta-analysis of 2,200 studies • They found a small statistical effect linking exposure to sexually explicit material with • An increased tendency to accept rape myths • An increased tendency to accept interpersonal violence in relationships

  30. Research Limitations

  31. Sexual Content and MediaCurrent Issues • “Cell Phone Sex Ed” • “Michigan Town Split” • “Sexting”

More Related