Ethical Approval Submissions Process for UG IS
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 4

Discussed during SREC - quorate (50% of membership plus one excluding admin support) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 85 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Ethical Approval Submissions Process for UG IS. Student to generate their ethical approval form alongside their research proposal which will be reviewed and considered by a member of academic staff (Project Supervisor). Ethical form deemed minimal risk?. Yes.

Download Presentation

Discussed during SREC - quorate (50% of membership plus one excluding admin support)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Discussed during srec quorate 50 of membership plus one excluding admin support

Ethical Approval Submissions Process for UG IS

Student to generate their ethical approval form alongside their research proposal which will be reviewed and considered by a member of academic staff (Project Supervisor)

Ethical form deemed minimal risk?

Yes

Member of academic staff to discuss with Independent Studies Coordinator

No

Next committee date too far in the future – to be dealt with as a Chairs action outside of SREC

Ethical Approval form to be issued to 3 readers or entire committee membership

Ethics approval form referred to SREC

Discussed during SREC - quorate (50% of membership plus one excluding admin support)

Approved

Approved with conditional comments

Resubmission to SREC after significant revisions

Declined

Save application and approval issued via letter or email

Submission of amendments to be sent through as Chairs action

Chair ensures to log onto spreadsheet and informs IS Coordinator

IS Coordinator to advise Supervisor

IS Coordinator/Supervisor to advise UG

Minutes available to UREC

Matters arising referred to FRRDC

Chairs to ensure there are clear and manageable set of protocols for the storage of UG IS forms. It is not necessarily Chairs responsibility to manage the storage (unless they feel that’s the best option to them)


Discussed during srec quorate 50 of membership plus one excluding admin support

Ethical Approval Submissions Process for PG Taught, Research and Professional

PG student to generate their ethical approval form alongside their research proposal which will be reviewed and considered by a member of academic staff (Project Supervisor)

No

Does the research also have the requirement for approval from a professional body?

Ethical form deemed minimal risk?

Yes

Member of academic staff to discuss with Module or Programme leader

No

Yes

Ethical Approval form to be issued to 3 readers or entire committee membership

Ethics approval form referred to SREC

Next committee date too far in the future – to be dealt with as a Chairs Action outside of SREC

Discussed during SREC - quorate (50% of membership plus one excluding admin support)

Approved

Approved with conditional comments

Resubmission to SREC after significant revisions

Declined

Save application and approval issued via letter or email

Submission of amendments to be sent through as Chairs action

Chair ensures to log onto spreadsheet and informs Module / Programme leader

Module / programme leader to advise applicant

Module / Programme leader to advise applicant

Minutes available to UREC

Matters arising referred to FRRDC

Chairs to ensure there are clear and manageable set of protocols for the storage of UG IS forms. It is not necessarily Chairs responsibility to manage the storage (unless they feel that’s the best option to them)


Discussed during srec quorate 50 of membership plus one excluding admin support

Ethical Approval Submissions Process for Staff Research

All applications relating to staff research must be considered by a SREC

Ethical Approval Form emailed out to 3 readers selected by the Chair

Readers to bring comments to discuss during the SREC

Is the applicant a committee member?

No

Ethical Approval Form emailed out to all SREC committee members

Yes

Ask the committee member whose application it is to leave the room during discussions

Note: if applicant is the Chair then a Deputy Chair will be appointed specifically to respond to that application

Approved

Approved with conditional comments

Resubmission to SREC after significant revisions

Declined

Save application and approval issued via email

Submission of amendments to be sent through as Chairs action

Chair ensures to log onto spreadsheet and informs applicant

Chair to advise applicant

Minutes available to UREC

Matters arising referred to FRRDC

Chairs to ensure there are clear and manageable set of protocols for the storage of UG IS forms. It is not necessarily Chairs responsibility to manage the storage (unless they feel that’s the best option to them)


Discussed during srec quorate 50 of membership plus one excluding admin support

Ethical Approval Sampling Process for UG IS, PGT, PG Research and PG Professional Students

The Chair should select a sample for review at the meeting –maximum of 15% and a minimum of 10 forms.

The sample could include applications from each Research Coordinator and forms that had been referred for consideration to the SREC

All ethical approval forms should be made available on request by SREC.

Observations discussed by SREC and feedback to Project Supervisors via IS Coordinators for staff development

Chair may decide to divide a large number of ethical research forms to committee members prior to the SREC

Chair to log sample review for Annual Monitoring Report purposes


  • Login