1 / 7

Obscenity

Obscenity. Defining Obscenity. Obscenity =. Indecent, Lewd, or Licentious. Licentious =. Lewd, Lascivious. Lascivious =. Lewd or Lustful. Lewd =. Indecent or obscene. Hicklin Test (Regina v. Hicklin). 1868.

yuval
Download Presentation

Obscenity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Obscenity

  2. Defining Obscenity Obscenity = Indecent, Lewd, or Licentious Licentious = Lewd, Lascivious Lascivious = Lewd or Lustful Lewd = Indecent or obscene

  3. Hicklin Test (Regina v. Hicklin) 1868 1. Tendency of the material is to “deprave and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences and into whose hands a publication of this sort may fall.” 2. Effect of “isolated passages” on the “most susceptible person.” Victoria R.

  4. Anthony Comstock (1844-1915) was a self-appointed anti-vice crusader from New York, who in the 1870s managed to shepherd through Congress a stringent anti-obscenity statute. This statute forbade, among other "impurities," the importing or mailing of contraceptives or contraceptive information. In the same era, Comstock-type statutes enacted in many state legislatures forbade the dissemination or, in some cases, even the use of contraceptives. Comstock was so zealous and effective in the enforcement of these laws that by the late 19th century, the subject of contraception had become unmentionable --even in major medical textbooks.

  5. Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure v. Massachusetts (1966) Supreme Court declares this book not to be obscene Follows on 1933 decision overturning a U.S. Customs official’s seizure of James Joyce’s Ulysses Literary value The work as a whole

  6. Roth v. U.S. (1957) 1. Obscenity is not protected speech 2. Rejected Hicklin test 3. New standard (Average person using contemporary standards) Miller v. California(1973) 1. Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find the work, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest. 2. Whether the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way sexual conduct specifically defined by state law. 3. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

  7. Legal Alternatives to Obscenity Prosecutions 1. Discrimination (MacKinnon, Canada) 2. Zoning Laws (New York City) 3. Indecent Conduct 4. Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Law (Racketeering) Fort Wayne Books v. Indiana

More Related