1 / 17

Aligning KM Market’s Top and Bottom Lines Erick Brethenoux

Aligning KM Market’s Top and Bottom Lines Erick Brethenoux APQC’s Fifth Knowledge Management Conference - December 8, 2000. Shifting Paradigms. The real infrastructure is culture. Mechanical Model. Natural Model. Newton Producers Capital Optimum design Machines / clocks

yukikog
Download Presentation

Aligning KM Market’s Top and Bottom Lines Erick Brethenoux

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Aligning KM Market’s Top and Bottom Lines Erick Brethenoux APQC’s Fifth Knowledge Management Conference - December 8, 2000

  2. Shifting Paradigms • The real infrastructure is culture Mechanical Model Natural Model Newton Producers Capital Optimum design Machines / clocks Command & Control Hierarchies Division of labor Land, energy & materials Einstein Consumers Creativity Adaptation Organisms / ecologies Autonomy & vision Self-organizing teams Synthesis of minds Knowledge Scientific leaders Sources of economic authority Principal economic constraint Strategic objectives Central metaphors Leadership implications Structure Organizing principles Sources of value

  3. From a Troubled Past... Technology Shortcomings Economic Conditions … To a promising adolescence • KM relies on IT to be efficient • Scalable technologies (scaling the network) • KM initiatives are business related • Internet has changed our professional culture for communications • Systems heterogeneity • Inadequate infrastructures • Immaturity of enabling technologies • Rightsizing From Corporate Memory to Knowledge Management

  4. Numbers on the Street a) Software spending in KM - (CAGR 67%) b) Services spending in KM - (CAGR 27%) c) Software and services spending as a % of total spending

  5. (Q + ) K T T K An Enterprise Value Equation Enterprise Value = iX(E*G) X = • E = Earnings • G = Growth • Q = Fundamentals Quality • = Vision Quality • = Timing Quality (distance between technological readiness & market acceptance) • i = inefficiency of the market (hype, fashion, ignorance, market fluctuations, Mr. Greenspan, consumer indices, presidential elections…)

  6. K T X as the Measure of Intangibles Keep up Stay ahead Must Know Does Know Competition Knows Internal Gap (Execution) External Gap (Vision) Organizational Issues (Strengths & Weaknesses) Environmental Issues (Opportunities & Threats) X Q

  7. (Q + ) • Q -> Execution - Fundamentals • Resource-based view • Evolutionary economics • -> Execution/Vision - Alliances • Resource dependence • Strategic alternatives • -> Vision - Innovation • Organizational learning • Sustaining vs. disruptive K K T T The Components of X

  8. Financial Practices Management Technology Marketing Q: Fundamentals - A Resource-based View • Fundamental intangibles • Emphasis on resources • Competitive advantage is a combination of strategically unique and rare resources • Strong secrecy, legal, and patents all cultivate high barriers to entry • Knowledge transfer across firms is an unknown concept

  9. Q: Fundamentals - Evolutionary Economics • Know-how embedded in enterprise’s business processes • Business processes evolve in response to external conditions • Internal selection for improved business processes • Breeding of best practices • Competency traps generated by sustained and repeated evolution

  10. : Alliances - Resource Dependence T • Strategic Focus: Manage change via inter-firm relationships • Level competitive differences through alliances and standards • Manage absorptive capacity through acquisitions and controls • Knowledge resides in networks of relationships

  11. : Alliances - Strategic Alternatives • One corporation • Multiple corporations • Complete control • No control Degree of Corporate Integration and Control • Knowledge sharing • Limited knowledge transfer • Full integration • No integration Acquisition Majority Investment Minority Investment Strategic Alliance T • Full control • Significant control • No/limited control • No control • Full integration • No integration • No integration • Complete independence • Difficult to unwind • Difficult to unwind • Ability to unwind • Easy to unwind • Full knowledge • Partial knowledge • Limited knowledge • Limited knowledge sharing sharing sharing sharing • A number of structural alternatives, reflecting various levels of integration and control.

  12. : Innovation - Organizational Learning K • Enterprise’s adaptation is dynamic • Learning as part of the corporate culture - directed / non-directed • Failure to achieve goals stimulates new learning • Limited resources - necessary condition for innovation • Incremental, sustaining innovation leads to myopic learning • Knowledge creation requires strategic intent to invest resources • Institutionalization of change and “technology watch” strategy

  13. : Innovation - The Innovator’s Dilemma K Business Value Infrastructure Optimization Business Process Innovation Revenues • CRM • Risk management • Process streamlining • Cultural dynamics • Adaptive strategies • Disruptive technologies Strategic Infrastructure Operations Business-related Operations Time • Logistics • Procurement • Finance • Product elaboration • Marketing intimacy • Best practices mgnt Tactical Sustaining innovation Disruptive innovation Process Competency Non-core Core

  14. Value Innovation: The Strategic Logic of High-Growth Companies • High-growth companies do not compete - they make their competitors irrelevant • They build on the powerful commonalities in features that customers value • They think in terms of total solutions (rather than merely overcome compromises enforced by the industry) • They build fundamentally different value curves for what customers value • Enterprise value in Pioneers, sizeable Migrators, but never in Settlers

  15. C11, C12, C13… R11, R12,R13… P11, P12, P13… P*1t C21, C22, C23… R21, R22,R23… P21, P22, P23… P*2t C31, C32, C33… R31, R32,R33… P31, P32, P33… P*3t Ci1, Ci2, Ci3… Ri1, Ri2,Ri3… Pi1, Pi2, Pi3… P*it What When Where Why How they buy Customer-Centered Value: The INFOVALUE Methodology • The Customer Information File Customer Characteristics Response to firm decisions Purchase History What they bought Cost of goods sold Profit Who they are  P*it Pit -> actual profit realized from customer i in period t P*it -> potential profit that could have been realized from customer I with optimal use of info assets

  16. K T Investing in Value: Technology Strategies • “Build vs. Buy” strategy beyond technologies • Proactive management of intellectual properties • Innovation does not imply reinventing the wheel • Greater attention to external monitoring of technologies & business processes • Organizational changes to support technology licensing, joint ventures and acquisition of external technologies and business processes Bottom Line: Uncompromising with Q, practical with , aggressive with

  17. The Knowledge Management Quest Approaching Infinity

More Related