Loading in 5 sec....

SPARTA: Stable and Efficient Spectrum Access in Next Generation Dynamic Spectrum NetworksPowerPoint Presentation

SPARTA: Stable and Efficient Spectrum Access in Next Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- 120 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' SPARTA: Stable and Efficient Spectrum Access in Next Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks' - yoshio-klein

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### SPARTA: Stable and Efficient Spectrum Access in Next Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

Lili Cao and Haitao Zheng,UCSB

IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) 2008

Presenter: Han-Tien Chang

Outline Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Introduction
- Background and Related Work
- Achieving Stable Spectrum Access
- Interference-aware Statistical Admission Control
- Stability-Driven Distributed Coordination
- Experimental Results and Discussions
- Practical Consideration
- Conclusion

Introduction Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- By multiplexing spectrum usage across time and space, dynamic spectrum access can significantly improve the spectrum utilization
- A critical problem of unstable spectrum usage
- Because of network and traffic dynamics, their achieved spectrum usages fluctuate and are inherently unpredictable and unstable
- To meet critical service agreements, service providers are forced to significantly over-provision the network
- Leading to unnecessary financial penalties and underutilization of spectrum

Introduction (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- SPARTA, a new DSA architecture
- Provide efficient and stable spectrum usage by integrating proactive planning with reactive adaptation
- Interference-aware statistical admission control
- a novel statistical admission control algorithm to proactively prevent congestion of spectrum demand while addressing interference constraints

- Stability-driven distributed spectrum allocation
- an efficient allocation algorithm to quickly adapt admitted APs’ spectrum usage to match their time-varying demands

Background and Related Work Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- The Problem of Unstable Spectrum Access
- nodes access spectrum opportunistically, making it difficult to obtain desired spectrum consistently

Network Topology

CDF of node spectrum

outage rate at different

network size

Spectrum demand and

assignment at a node

Background and Related Work (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- The problem of spectrum allocation
- is often modeled as resource scheduling problems [12]
- [23] [24] propose algorithms to dynamically allocate spectrum to match demands

- In this paper,
- integrating admission control with dynamic spectrum allocation to achieve stable and efficient spectrum usage
- focuses on the spectrum allocation problem with a set of combinatorial interference constraints

[12] JAIN, K., PADHYE, J., PADMANABHAN, V., AND QIU, L. Impact of interference on multi-hop wireless network performance. In Proc. of MobiCom (2003).

[23] YUAN, Y., BAHL, P., CHANDRA, R., CHOU, P. A., FERRELL, J. I., MOSCIBRODA, T., NARLANKA, S., AND WU, Y. Knows: Kognitiv networking over white spaces. In Proc. of IEEE DySPAN (2007).

[24] YUAN, Y., BAHL, P., CHANDRA, R., MOSCIBRODA, T., NARLANKA, S., AND WU, Y. Allocating dynamic time-spectrum blocks in cognitive radio networks. In Proc. of MobiHoc (2007).

Achieving Stable Spectrum Access Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Problem Definition
- Consider a large infrastructure network with N APs and M channels in a time horizon of [0,T]
- Assumptions
- Using OFDM
- Nodes can utilize multiple non-continuous channels concurrently
- Focus on channel assignment and assume fixed transmit power
- The time is divided into small slots and nodes can only modify spectrum usage at the beginning of each slot.

Achieving Stable Spectrum Access (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Notations
- Spectrum demand Dn(t)
- The amount of spectrum node n requests at time t

- Demand shaping Rn(.)
- The shaping determined at the time of admission
- The admitted demand at time t is Rn(Dn(t))
- 0≦ Rn(Dn(t)) ≦ Dn(t)

- Spectrum allocation An(t) =
- The amount of spectrum n gets at time t ( an,m(t) ∈{0,1} )
- an,m(t) = 1 means channel m is allocated to n.

- Interference constraints cn,k,m (cn,k)
- The conflict constraint between node n and k on channel m
- cn,k,m= 1 means node n and k should not use channel m at the same time
- an,m(t) * ak,m(t) = 0 if cn,k, = 1

- Spectrum demand Dn(t)

Achieving Stable Spectrum Access (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Optimization problem

Given

Find

Θn represents the maximum outage rate at node n.

U (.) represents the utility function used by the admission control module.

Goal: Maximize the total admitted demand, where U(x) = x

Achieving Stable Spectrum Access (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks Peak Demand based Static Access

- The above problem can be divided into two sub-problems
- at time 0, defining spectrum shaping {Rn(.)}N
- From time – to T, performing instantaneous spectrum allocation in each time slot to find {an,m(t) }NxM
- are NP-Hard

The system treats each (bursty) demand as if it is a constant traffic at a

rate of Dmaxnand assigns spectrum to match its peak demand.

Achieving Stable Spectrum Access (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- The SPARTA Architecture (Two components)
- A central entity performs interference-aware statistical admission control to regulate spectrum demand and prevent outages
- Admitted APs perform stability-driven distributed spectrum allocationto determine instantaneous spectrum usage to match their time-varying demands

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Motivated by prior work on statistical admission control using effective rate [15][16]
- Assumes perfect knowledge of the statistical model of each AP’s spectrum demand and the global interference constraints
- Background on Effective Rate
- routers can treat the flow (with bursty traffic) as if it is a constant traffic at this effective rate during the active period of the flow.

[15] KELLY, F. Notes on effective bandwidths. In Stochastic Networks: Theory and Applications, F. Kelly, S. Zachary, and I. Ziedins, Eds.,Royal Statistical Society Lecture Notes Series. Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 141–168.

[16] KELLY, F. P. Charging and accounting for bursty connections. In Internet economics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 253–278.

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Let Xi (1≦i ≦N) represent a random variable
- whose value is the amount of bandwidth requested by node i in a time slot

- The router admits all N nodes if
- Define the effective rate of node Xi as

e-γ: outage rate

C: total amount of bandwidth

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Effective rate based spectrum demand shaping
- original effective-rate design relies on the linear constraints
- The interference constraints are combinatorial and non-linear (need approximation)
- Node-L Constraints
- Let be the total amount of spectrum allocated to node n under this new constraint
- where Inis the set of conflict peers of n in the original constraint who are left of n(geometric order)

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks Two admission policies

- using Node-L constraints, each individual node’s outage rate is bounded by the outage rate of the constraint

- Binary shaping, Rn(x) = rnx and rn∈ {0,1}
- A node is either fully admitted or declined

- Continuous shaping, Rn(x) = rnx and rn∈ [0,1]
- A node can be partially admitted

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks Fast algorithm for continuous demand shaping

- propose analytical results on deriving sub-optimal snvalues under different demand statistics.
- several heuristics to choose the uniform s

- After choosing sn, we develop efficient solutions to find sub-optimal rnvalues

where hiis the peak rate, miis the mean rate, and riis the demand shaping factor

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Let xi = airi(s). We can calculate rifrom xi, ri= Fi(xi)
- Using a low-complexity local search algorithm using the concept of “Feed Poverty” [4]
- The algorithm runs iteratively

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- In iteration k, the algorithm will
- Choose node i, increase its effective rate: xki= xk-1i+Δx
- Adjust the effective rate of other nodes
- who share the same constraints with i until all the constraints are satisfied.

- If the total system utility increases, apply this improvement, go to iteration k + 1.
- Otherwise, discard the improvement, go to iteration k + 1.

- The algorithm terminates if no more local modifications can improve the system utility

Interference-Aware Statistical Admission Control (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks Greedy Algorithm for Binary Demand Shaping

- Tow policies that how to adjust the effective rate of other nodes to satisfy all the constraints
- Proportionally amortized decrease
- For each constraint I which contains xi, if increasing xiviolates I, the algorithm must decrease the effective rate of other nodes in I

- Tightest constraint first
- need to optimize the ordering of constraint adjustments to avoid unnecessary ping-pong effect

- Proportionally amortized decrease

- starting from an empty admission, iteratively admit nodes one by one

Stability-Driven Distributed Coordination Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- A low-complexity distributed algorithm
- admitted APs determine spectrum allocation using local coordination
- each AP n applies the following procedure to choose spectrum channels
- 1. Mark all the channels that are used by its neighbors who are in front of nin the ordering as “unavailable”; and who are behind nin the ordering as “busy”; mark the rest as “idle”
- 2.1 Select channels from the set of “idle” channels. If the set is not sufficient to meet n’s demand, take channels from the set of “busy” channels.
- 2.2 Neighboring nodes who are using these “busy” channels will exit from these channels and mark them as “unavailable”.
- 3. Stop if n’s demand is satisfied or if the “idle” and “busy” sets become empty.

Experimental Results and Discussions Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Evaluate SPARTA using network simulations
- Randomly deploy APs in an 1x1 area
- Two nodes conflict if their distance is within d = 0.2
- Assume that nodes’ demand follows the On/Off model with mean m (0.15) and peak rate h (1).
- Effective Rate vs Peak Rate Admission Control
- PRA-B (Peak rate admission using binary shaping)
- PRA-C (Peak rate admission using continuous shaping)
- SPARTA-B (SPARTA with binary shaping)
- SPARTA-C (SPARTA with continuous shaping)
- No Adm – no admission control and APs contend for spectrum in each time slot

Experimental Results and Discussions (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- guarantee the outage rate to below 2% while the system without admission control suffers from an average outage rate of 60% for a network size of 500 and 20% for 300
- compared to PRA, SPARTA increases spectrum utilization by 80–100%

Experimental Results and Discussions (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

Peak Rate

Mean Rate

For a given peak rate range, lowering the mean rate leads to higher gain in SPARTA, because of the increased degree of multiplexing

Experimental Results and Discussions (cont’d) Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Impact of network topology

In different cluster degree w.

As w increases, the spectrum utilization decreases because the level of interference increases

Practical consideration Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Identifying Interference Constraints
- The serverperforms network measurements to collect interference constraints
- Individual nodes scan radio signals to find interfering nodes and report their findings to the server
- Clients associated with nodes sense radio signals and provide feedback on findings of interfering nodes

- Identifying Demand Statistics
- proposed solution also requires information on demand statistics

Conclusion Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Consider the problem of providing stable and efficient spectrum access in DSA networks
- SPARTAcombines proactive planning with reactive adaptation to match spectrum allocation to time-varying demands
- Using both analytical verification and experimental simulation
- SPARTA can guarantee stable spectrum access while maximizing spectrum utilization

Comments Generation Dynamic Spectrum Networks

- Combine the admission control with DSA problems
- Well problem definition and modeling
- Linear approximation to non-linear constraints

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..