CUPE Local 3902 Information Seminar

1. Draft for Discussion Purposes Taxation of Post-doctoral Fellowship Income April 5, 2013 CUPE Local 3902 Information Seminar Roberto Tomassini, Partner Phone: 416-595-2116 E-mail: rtomassini@kmlaw.ca

2. Draft for Discussion Purposes Introduction and Overview • This seminar is intended to provide general information regarding the taxation of post-doctoral fellowship (“PDF”) income • Taxation of income is fact specific and turns on the terms of the relationship between the payor and the recipient and the characterization of the income at issue • Taxation of PDF income is complicated because of the variety of forms which a post-doctoral fellowship may take and the differential tax treatment of the type of payments received • Your taxation depends on the specific terms of your engagement and you should receive individual tax advice based on your own circumstances

3. Draft for Discussion Purposes General Principles • Generally, income received by an individual (not a corporation) for services provided to a third party is taxed either as employment income or “business” income • Proper taxation is dependent on the legal relationship between the parties • The agreement of the parties regarding the nature of the relationship is not binding on the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) or the Courts • The parties may state in an agreement that the relationship is not an employment arrangement – the CRA and the Courts will ignore this agreement if in fact under the general law the relationship is an employment relationship

4. Draft for Discussion Purposes General Principles Cont’d • Regardless of the tax characterization of the income the recipient is obligated to pay taxes on income unless otherwise exempt • The Canadian income tax system is based on self assessment principle – all Canadian residents and non-residents who earn income in Canada - are required to report annually and pay taxes on their income • The CRA has the authority to reassess a return if they disagree with the return as filed • Taxable income of an individual (regardless of source/classification) is taxed at his/her marginal tax rate • The blended tax rate for Ontario residents ranges from 20.05% for the first $39,723 of taxable income to 49.53% for income over $509,000

5. Draft for Discussion Purposes Taxation of PDF Income • Taxation of PDF income is more complicated: • “For income tax purposes, there has never been a single, simple position with respect to income received by Academic PDFs. In some cases, the income received by an Academic PDF could be properly included under paragraph 56(1)(n) [of the Income Tax Act, i.e. as a “scholarship, fellowship or bursary”]; in most cases, we would expect either section 5 (for employment income) or paragraph 56(1)(o) (for research grants) to apply.” CRA Technical Interpretation 2009 – 0311901E5 – cited by the Ontario Labour Relations Board (2012) – employment status of U of T PDFs • “Staff, student or employee? The employment status of Canadian post-doctoral researchers remain unclear – many are struggling with the tax issues that arise from the ambiguity.” From Nature.com quoted in the Tax Court of Canada Decision – Chabaud v. The Queen 2012 DTC 1076

6. Draft for Discussion Purposes Tax Character of PDF Payments • PDF payments may be characterized as: • Scholarship, fellowship or bursary; • Research grants; • Employment income; or • Business income (least likely)

7. Draft for Discussion Purposes Scholarship, Fellowship or Bursary Income • Amounts paid or benefits given to persons to enable them to advance their education – “financial assistance” • If primary purpose of the payment is to further education and training such as studying for a doctoral degree, the payments are treated as fellowship or scholarship income under subparagraph 56(1)(n)(i) • Section 56(3)(c) provides an exemption from tax for scholarship, fellowship or bursary income: • $500 exemption; • Full exemption if payment intended to support enrollment in an educational institution qualifying for the education tax credit

8. Draft for Discussion Purposes The Full Scholarship Exemption - Do PDFs Qualify? • Some uncertainty prior to 2010 – CRA’s view is that the full exemption was never intended to apply to PDF income • ITA changes announced in the 2010 budget make clear that PDFs are generally not eligible for the full exemption • Exemption requirements: • Must be entitled to the education tax credit (subsection 118.6(2) which requires that: • The individual must be a student; and • He/she must be enrolled in a “qualifying educational program” at a designated educational institution; and • The amount paid must be connected with educational program for which the education tax credit is claimed • To qualify for the full exemption the payments must be made in connection with research or education leading towards a degree – this disqualifies most PDF payments

9. Draft for Discussion Purposes Scholarship v. Employment Income • Paragraph 56(1)(n) of the ITA relating to the taxation of scholarship and bursaries expressly excludes amounts received by virtue of an office or employment • This requires a determination of the character of the payments - if employment income it does not qualify as scholarship income • The fundamental question which both the Courts and the CRA have grappled with is whether the payments under consideration provides financial assistance to further a recipient’s education or as compensation for work performed • Caropreso v. R. (2012) TCC – the difficulty is that payments to PDFs often have dual elements – the payments may further the education of the PDF but also provide compensation for work performed if payments are received by virtue of employment, this takes precedence. • In making the determination the CRA and the Courts consider the dominant characteristic of the payments – whether it is compensation for work or student assistance

10. Draft for Discussion Purposes Scholarship v. Employment Income – The Tax Court’s View • The Tax Court has issued a number of seemingly contradictory rulings relating to PDFs – most recent confirmed CRA’s view that PDF payments are employment income Chabaud v. The Queen (2011) DTC 1076 (Informal Procedure) Caropreso v. R. 2012 CarswellNat 1925 (Informal Procedure) • In both cases the PDFs characterized income as scholarship, bursary or fellowship income and claimed the full exemption • They were reassessed – full amount of their remuneration was included in income and subject to tax, interest and penalties • Tax Court acknowledged that the relationship included elements of education and training but that these elements were subsidiary to the employment relationship • Court determined that in essence PDFs were remunerated for services rendered, were subject to supervision and direction by their research professors who had ability to control the manner in which the PDFs performed their work

11. Draft for Discussion Purposes Scholarship v. Employment Income – The Tax Court’s View Cont’d • In Chabaud, Tax Court specifically rejected the argument that the relationship between the research professor and the PDF was one of student and professor – a professor does not pay a student when the student studies, in fact the opposite is true – it is the student who pays tuition fees • the Court analogized PDFs to articling law student, medical resident, or accounting trainee, all of whom require more experience and training as part of their career advancement, but are paid remuneration for their work which is taxable as employment income • The Tax Court reached a different conclusion in Zhang v. R., 2010 CarswellNat 4326 (Informal Procedure), Huang v. R., 2012 CarswellNat 551 (Informal Procedure) • Tax Court refused to hear the CRA’s argument that the PDF income in Huang was employment income because raised too late – not even considered in the Zhang decision

12. Draft for Discussion Purposes Canada Pension Plan and Employment Insurance Considerations • Several cases have found PDF’s remuneration not to be employment income for the purposes of EI and CPP • Ontario Cancer Institute, 1993 CarswellNat 2659: • “…not an employment contract of service. It was a contract for education and training for an indefinite period of time” • Bekhor, 2005 CarswellNat 2052 • “…the relationship…was one of advanced student and professor, not one of employee and employer. The stipend received was in the nature of financial assistance provided to a learning postdoctoral fellow, not remuneration for services rendered by an employee to an employer.” • Naghash, 2005 CarswellNat 3651 • The facts similar to those in Bekhorand the Tax Court adopted the same conclusion – relationship was educator – trainee not employment

13. Draft for Discussion Purposes Employment Income – Determining Factors • Direction and control • Control is the ability, authority, or right of a payer to exercise control over a worker concerning the manner in which the work is done and what work will be done (i.e. hours of work, supervise, control the method and amount of pay) • Ownership of tools and equipment • If the worker provides their own tools and equipment, this militates against them being an employee • Subcontracting work or hiring assistants • If the worker can subcontract their work to another person then not likely an employee • Financial risk • Determine if there are any fixed costs incurred by the employee or any expenses that will not be reimbursed • Opportunity for profit • Can the worker realize a profit • Integration

14. Draft for Discussion Purposes Determining Factors and PDFs Canadian Union Public Employees v. University of Toronto, 2012 CanLII1673 (ONLRB) • In its decision the OLRB after applying a similar test referenced these determining factors and concluded: “The fact is that the PDFs perform work in the University of Toronto’s labs, using the University’s equipment and materials, produce something of value, i.e. research, and receive compensation from the University for the performance of that work. These are all hallmarks of an employment relationship.”

15. Draft for Discussion Purposes Research Grants v. Employment Income • Grants received in a taxation year to enable a taxpayer to carry on research or any similar work are included as income as research grants under paragraph 56(1)(o) of the ITA • What distinguishes the taxation of research grants is that the grants are only included to the extent that they exceed the total of the allowable expenses • Expenses may include salary or wages paid to assistants, cost of equipment and supplies, laboratory charges, travelling expenses for the purposes of carrying out the work – does not include personal living expenses

16. Draft for Discussion Purposes Research Grants Cont’d • In order for a grant to be considered a “research grant”, the terms of the grant must establish that the primary purpose of the grant is to carry out “research” • For CRA’s purposes, “research” involves a critical or scientific inquiry aimed at the discovery of new facts, or the development of new interpretations or applications • Individuals whose duties of employment include research responsibilities are not entitled to treat a portion of their regular salaries as a research grant when they engage in the type of research work ordinarily expected of them under their terms of employment

17. Draft for Discussion Purposes Tax of Non-resident PDFs • General residency rules • Residents: subject to Canadian income tax on worldwide income from all sources • Non-residents: only subject to Canadian income tax on income from sources inside Canada • The term "resident" is not defined – you are non-resident for tax purposes if you: • Normally, customarily, routinely live in another country; or • You do not have significant residential ties in Canada (a home, spouse, property, social ties, bank accounts, driver’s license, health insurance); and • You live outside of Canada throughout the year; or • You stay in Canada for less than 183 days in the year (deemed residency) • If you are a factual resident of Canada and another country you may be considered a non-resident of Canada for tax purposes under a tax treaty with your other country of residence

18. Draft for Discussion Purposes Tax of Non-resident PDFs Cont’d • There are special rules for non-resident individuals who are students, carrying on research or previously a Canadian resident who receives income from employment, fellowships and research grants • Non-resident deemed to be employed in Canada for purposes of determining non-resident income • Subparagraph 115(2)(e)(ii) requires non-resident income to be calculated as the amount that would be required to be included as either fellowship or grant income if the individual was a resident of Canada • Same rules apply to determine if income characterized as employment income, scholarship/fellowship income or research grant

19. Draft for Discussion Purposes Summary • PDF income may be taxed as scholarship, bursary or fellowship, research grant, employment or business income • If your engagement bears the hallmarks of employment relationship the CRA and the Tax Court are likely to characterize payments received as taxable employment income • However, PDF engagement may not be treated as employment for CPP and the EI purposes • If income properly characterized as scholarship or fellowship, income is still taxable above $500 exemption – full exemption not available • Law is uncertain and you bear the cost; penalties and interest if you are wrong • Get personal tax advice

20. Questions