Writing for research
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 13

Writing for research PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 74 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Writing for research. Svetlana Kucherenko National Research University- Higher School of Economics Saint-Petersburg, Russia. CHALLENGES FOR RUSSIAN STUDENTS. Analytical vs Argumentative Research Papers The IMRAD format Literature Review Research Question Substantiating claims.

Download Presentation

Writing for research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Writing for research

Writing for research

Svetlana Kucherenko

National Research University- Higher School of Economics

Saint-Petersburg, Russia


Challenges for russian students

CHALLENGES FOR RUSSIAN STUDENTS

  • Analytical vs Argumentative Research Papers

  • The IMRAD format

  • Literature Review

  • Research Question

  • Substantiating claims


Types of research papers

Types of Research Papers


Imrad format

IMRAD Format


Discussion

Discussion

  • How much do your findings fit into theories that you reviewed in the literature review?

  • What do your findings say about your research question?

  • Are there any alternative explanations?

  • Are there any limitations?

  • Can you suggest directions for further research?


Literature review

Literature Review

Summary

Critique


Questions to ask of every book

Questions to Ask of Every Book

  • Has the author formulated a problem/issue?

  • Is it clearly defined?

  • How does the author structure the argument?

  • In what way does this book contribute to understanding of the problem under study?

  • What are strengths and limitations?


Example

Example

  • I have focused in so much detail on Wartenberg’s theorization of power to show that his theory is truly superior to other theories on a number of counts. First, to develop his theory he examines in great detail about twenty other theories of power to bring to light their weak and strong points. Second, Wartenberg’s approach to developing a new theory of power is different from a traditional discourse when a theorist identifies faults in other theories and suggests new solutions to the problems addressed within the rejected theories. Wartenberg suggests a new manner of theorising social reality, for example, by moving from observation to theory rather than from theory to observation as it was previously done. As a result, Wartenberg thinks in categories that surpass the level of individual theories of power and brings to light faulty assumptions typical of strands of theories, for example he distinguishes theories according to their position on power as power-to and power-over.


Research question

Research Question

  • Stage 1: focusing the topic

  • Stage 2: statement of purpose

  • Stage 3: thesis statement

  • Stage 4: research question


Example i

Example I


Example ii

Example II

  • I want to know why existing theories of power do not give an adequate account of workings of power in discourse

  • Most theories of power do not account for workings of power in discourse because they are mono-dimensional

  • Why do existing theories of power not provide an adequate account of workings of power in discourse?


Substantiating claims

Substantiating Claims

  • argument+evidence


Hedging

Hedging

  • Sound cautious and tentative

    E.g. It means that=>This suggests that

    To reduce the risk of opposition


  • Login