What are we learning about training in evidence based public health among local practitioners
Download
1 / 29

What are we learning about training in evidence-based public health among local practitioners? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 95 Views
  • Uploaded on

What are we learning about training in evidence-based public health among local practitioners?. THANKS!!. Ross Brownson Janet Canavese Beth Baker Katie Stamatakis Katie Duggan Carol Brownson Paul Erwin Case Western PRC Robert Fields UNC PRC Carson Smith MI PRC

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' What are we learning about training in evidence-based public health among local practitioners?' - yitta


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Thanks
THANKS!! health among local practitioners?

Ross Brownson Janet Canavese

Beth Baker Katie Stamatakis

Katie Duggan Carol Brownson

Paul Erwin Case Western PRC

Robert Fields UNC PRC

Carson Smith MI PRC

Rodrigo Reis U of WA PRC

Carolyn Leep (NACCHO) Jenine Harris

Rachel Tabak Chris Casey

Amy Eyler Beth Dodson

Kathleen Wojciehowski


What is project lead
What is Project LEAD? health among local practitioners?

4 Aims:

  • Describe the evidence-base for local EBPH in the United States (esp. A-EBPs)

  • Test the effectiveness of local-level EBPH capacity building in 4 states (Train the Trainer)

  • Describe a range of local models in EBPH

  • Translate and disseminate findings to stakeholders


Selected findings aim 1
Selected findings (Aim 1) health among local practitioners?


Administrative evidence based practices a ebp s
Administrative evidence-based practices (A-EBP health among local practitioners?s)

  • Agency (health department)-level structures and activities that are positively associated with performance measures (e.g., achieving core public health functions, carrying out evidence-based interventions)

Brownson, Allen, Duggan, Stamatakis, & Erwin. Am J Prev Med, 2012


Results 5 ebp domains
Results, 5 EBP domains health among local practitioners?

  • Workforce development

    • QI (82%), EBDM (59%)

  • Leadership

    • Staff participation (84%) hire w/ PH degree (36%)

  • Organizational climate and culture

    • Life long learning (71%), culture supports EBDM (42%)

  • Relationships and partnerships

    • Importance (92%), share resources (68%)

  • Financial processes

    • Multi funding sources (96%), QI resources (55%)


Predictors of a ebp s
Predictors of a-EBP health among local practitioners?s


Early results
Early Results health among local practitioners?

Patterns of A-EBPs and use of EBDM vary significantly based on:

  • Population size served by the LHD (strongest predictors after adjustment)

    • Smaller HDs 3X more likely to be led by a nurse

  • Governance structure (state governed)

  • Age group in the 50s


Use of resources
Use of resources health among local practitioners?

  • 26% of LHDs reported systematic reviews as 1 of top 3 most important resources

  • 34% were not familiar with the Community Guide


A tale of two worlds
A tale of two worlds… health among local practitioners?


Selected findings aim 2
Selected findings (Aim 2) health among local practitioners?


Train the trainer
Train the Trainer health among local practitioners?

  • November 2012, St. Louis Missouri

  • Recruitment of PRC’s

    • Geographic distribution

    • PRCs with established relationships with PHTCs or PBRNs

    • “Ready to hit the ground running”


Training locations
Training Locations health among local practitioners?

  • Case Western Reserve UniversityPrevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods andPBRN

  • University of MichiganPrevention Research Center of Michigan and Michigan Public Health Training Center

  • University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention and PHTC

  • University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center and PHTC


Train the trainer process
Train the Trainer Process health among local practitioners?

  • Partners from PRC came to St Louis for 3 day training and overview of Evidence Based Public Health course

  • Conference calls with each site to set up logistics and provide technical assistance

  • EBPH slides and materials for trainings given to each site

  • PRC in conjunction with PBRN or PHTC put on training for local health departments in their area


Train the trainer1
Train the Trainer health among local practitioners?

  • Review of Module Content

  • Focus on “Process” for course delivery


Recruiting participants for the state trainings
Recruiting participants for the health among local practitioners?State Trainings

  • Emails to various public health listservs

    • PBRN, LHD commissioners, directors of nursing, etc.

  • Website postings

    • PRC and PHTC

  • Announcements and flyers at conferences

  • Help from state health department

    **Each state had waiting lists


Participants of trainings
Participants of Trainings health among local practitioners?

  • 57% program manager or coordinator, 22% top executive, administrator, or assistant director

  • 2% doctoral degree, 24% public health masters, 37% other masters, 9% nursing degree, 28% bachelors degree or less

  • Mean years in current position = 5.2 years, mean years in public health = 8.8 years

  • Number of organizations represented at state trainings in person = 101 (OH = 24, MI = 21, NC = 26, WA = 20)


Course format
Course Format health among local practitioners?

Two locations used traditional in-person training and two used mixed modes for course delivery i.e. in-person and webinars for distance learning capabilities

  • WA – 3 one-hour webinars with 2 days of in-person training

  • MI – 2 onsite training days, 3 modules each day, 3 modules by webinar, 2 of which had multiple days


11 ebph skills evaluated pre training course survey
11 EBPH Skills Evaluated health among local practitioners?(pre-training course survey)

I Can…

  • develop a concise statement of the issue

  • conduct a community assessment

  • describe the issue in a quantitative way

  • discover what is known about the issue through the scientific literature

  • prioritize program or policy options that address the issue

  • understand economic evaluation to use findings from others to

  • assist with determining which intervention would be best suited for my community and population of interest

  • understand economic evaluation to assist in the design and implementation of an economic evaluation

  • develop an action plan for the program or policy

  • qualitatively evaluate the program or policy

  • quantitatively evaluate the program or policy

  • economically evaluate the program or policy


Pre post skill abilities course survey
Pre/Post Skill Abilities health among local practitioners?(course survey)

  • Data show participants felt more capable of all 11 skills after the training

    • Differences in ability scores between pre and post evaluations were all statistically significant using p=.01 for sites evaluated


An example skills ability for case western and nc combined
An Example: Skills Ability for health among local practitioners?Case Western and NC combined

Pre

Pre

Post

Post

Number of responses

Number of responses

I can prioritize program or policy options that address the issue

I can qualitatively evaluate the program or policy


Views related to ebdm pre training survey
Views Related to EBDM health among local practitioners?(pre-training survey)

  • I feel that I have the skills necessary for developing evidence-based interventions (No. 76, 59.4%)

  • I feel that I can effectively communicate information on evidence-based strategies to policy matters (No. 54, 42.2%)

  • I feel evidence-based interventions are packaged in a way that I can use them (No. 34, 26.6%)

  • I feel evidence-based interventions are designed in a way to be self-sustaining (No. 30, 23.6%)

  • I feel that I need to be an expert on many issues in order to effectively make evidence-based decisions (No. 22, 17.2%)

  • My fears about job security prevent me from using EBDM (No. 6, 4.7%)


Which of the following would most encourage you to utilize ebdm in your work pre training survey
Which health among local practitioners?of the following would most encourage you to utilize EBDM in your work? (pre-training survey)

  • Placing a high priority on EBDM in your work

  • Trainings on EBDM

  • Positive feedback for EBDM use


Which of the following would most encourage you to utilize ebdm in your work
Which of the following would health among local practitioners?most encourage you to utilize EBDM in your work?

  • Director’s Survey

    • Trainings on EBDM

    • Placing a high priority on EBDM by leaders in my agency

    • Positive feedback for EBDM use

  • Programmatic Survey

    • Placing a high priority on EBDM in your work

    • Trainings on EBDM

    • Positive feedback for EBDM use


Gap between importance and availability of skills pre training survey
Gap between importance and availability of health among local practitioners?skills(pre-training survey)

  • Economic Evaluation 4.1

  • Communicating research to policy makers 3.5

  • Evaluation designs 3.3

  • Adapting interventions 3.2

  • Prioritizing health issues 2.7


What participants most liked about the course post training course survey
What participants most liked health among local practitioners?about the course (post-training course survey)

  • The breadth of the topics truly encouraged use of evidence across all functions of a LHD, not just programs

  • Being able to concentrate on learning and having a systematic approach to follow

  • Presents a whole new way of thinking about public health practice


Lessons learned webinars advantages and disadvantages
Lessons Learned health among local practitioners?Webinars – advantages and disadvantages

Advantages

  • Quicker and easier for participants

  • Less expensive

  • Flexibility of combined format was appreciated by participants

    Disadvantages

  • Opportunity for both formal and informal interaction among participants and between participants and instructors is much less

  • Onsite instruction was more effective


Take away messages from aim 2
Take away messages from Aim 2 health among local practitioners?

  • All surveys point to the need for more training in EBPH

  • The pre/post evaluations received from the trainings indicate that participants feel more competent in EBPH skills after training

  • EBPH trainings = improved skills, ability and increased potential for change in local health departments


Ideas going forward
Ideas going forward… health among local practitioners?

  • Continue analyses, featuring more complex data linkage

  • Explore context and meaning of Aim 1 gaps

    • Develop new approaches for these populations (e.g., findings for nurses)

  • Explore new approaches for information seeking

  • Enhance Aim 2 additional technical assistance (beyond the EBPH courses)

    • Scaling up findings from Aim 2

  • Use Aim 3 findings to find and test new leverage points

  • Link more closely with AcademyHealth for dissemination


ad