1 / 18

THE VICTIMS

THE VICTIMS. by Sharon Olds (from Suzanne Choo’s Unseen Poetry and Prose , p. 56). Attitude of the children in the beginning. Children inwardly elated. Obviously took the side of their mother, sharing her joy of seeing their father’s downfall.

yeva
Download Presentation

THE VICTIMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE VICTIMS by Sharon Olds (from Suzanne Choo’s Unseen Poetry and Prose, p. 56)

  2. Attitude of the children in the beginning • Children inwardly elated. Obviously took the side of their mother, sharing her joy of seeing their father’s downfall. • “Then you were fired, and we / grinned inside” and “We were tickled / to think of your office taken away” indicates the malicious attitude they had towards the degradation of their father. Illustrates their familial anger.

  3. Attitude of children • Vicious anger of children expressed in their gloating over the way every bit of his life is stripped away. They detest his materialistic lifestyle and arrogance. • For e.g., father’s suits are described as “dark carcasses” symbolic of fact that they regard father as dead.

  4. Attitude of children • Repetition of ‘dark’ in “dark carcasses” and “dark pores” suggests that they view him as a cruel, evil presence. • Conveys the extent of their hatred for him.

  5. Attitude of children • Sense of anger towards the father climaxes in the line, “until we pricked with her for your annihilation.” • ‘Pricked’ gives the impression that the children are vultures fighting to devour their father. • ‘Annihilation’, a strong word which implies they regard their father as a dangerous enemy whom they need to be rid of.

  6. Do we blame or sympathise with the father? • In line 17, attitude of the speaker changes. • She notices the bums in the doorways. • Realizes the downfall of her father is not just a fun game of revenge but is of tremendous pain to him. • Begins to sympathise with him. • In considering his situation, she criticizes herself for her attitude – “I wonder who took it and took it from them.”

  7. Style of narration – use of metaphors • The metaphor “white slugs” compares the bums to worms. Implies how far they have degenerated until they no longer resemble civilised people. • The metaphor, “the stained flippers creating the visual impression of these bums slouching lethargically in a filthy corner. Their lack of life and aimlessness evoke a sense of sympathy in us and contribute to a heavy, solemn mood.

  8. Style of narration – use of metaphors • “Ships gone down with the lantern lit”, strong metaphor compared to their human vigor and spirit . • A sunken ship implies the utter material and psychological devastation of her father. • Like a once majestic and glorious ship, he is now reduced to nothing.

  9. Style of narration – use of metaphors • Lanterns are lit while it sinks implies devastation was fast and he was caught unprepared. • Mood at the end conveys sense of depression and hopelessness. We sympathise with father for all that he has lost – his career, family and self-dignity. • Like a ship that has sunk, he cannot return to former life.

  10. Relevance of title – The Victims • 3 victims in the poem: speaker’s mother, her father and the speaker herself. • Speaker’s mother possibly a victim of husband’s abuse initially. Typical of his rich, arrogant and flamboyant personality and probably accounts for the deep hatred she has for him. • “She took it and took it, in silence all those years” describes amount of pain she has endured.

  11. Relevance of title – The Victims • Father as victim of his society. • Relied on power and sense of pride which his lifestyle and society fed him e.g. he had many secretaries, expensive suits and lunches. • Fuelled by his ego and arrogance, he lost his family in the process.

  12. Relevance of title – The Victims • Reliance and sacrifice to the materialistic lifestyle he had, eventually led to his downfall • When his business failed, the society he worked for and lived for neglected and betrayed him in the end, leaving him a bum on the streets • He is victim to the greed and power-hungry society he lives in.

  13. Relevance of title – The Victims • Speaker is also a victim in the poem. • Probably caught in conflict between her parents at a young age. • Her deep sense of hurt may be caused by her confusion over her parents’ separation. • Through the years, expresses this hurt by plotting revenge with her mother and siblings.

  14. Relevance of title – The Victims • Irony: when her father is eventually broken and left with nothing, she is not filled with elation, but remorse and guilt. • In the last lines, she shows signs of regret as she questions her own cruel behaviour towards him. • “took it”, “I wonder who took it from them” is repeated to show there are no winners in this matter. • Both husband and wife suffer from the pain of divorce.

  15. Is the father to be sympathised with? • Father led an extravagant life – quite a glorious and grandeur former life. Expensive suits, lunches, bourbons are indicative of a luxurious materialistic lifestyle and his vanity and image consciousness. • Neglect of his family. Irresponsible father. Domination and control over house and wife.

  16. Is the father to be sympathised with? • Insecurity in family. Sense of fear of father. • End of poem: weak person, confidence just a façade. • During trials, compared to a ship that sinks. • Sense of hopelessness, reveals his lack of courage and strength to overcome problems.

  17. Is the style of narration effective? • 1st person narrative, conversational and more personal. • As if narrator were speaking with father. • Style could be way of narrator attempting to reconcile with her father. • Appropriate style as issue of family breakup is a personal. • Allows speaker’s reflection and arouses sympathy of readers for the family.

  18. Effectiveness of last line • Shortest line of poem. • Simple and clear in its meaning. • Repeats idea of emptiness and annihilation. • Irony as speaker achieves her plans to annihilate father but feels deep sense of remorse as a result. • Like the foul smell from a carcass, she repels him and detests his materialistic lifestyle.

More Related