Social Protection of the Rural Population:
Download
1 / 22

ISSA General Assembly, Beijing 2004 ILO Session, Wed., Sept. 15, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 129 Views
  • Uploaded on

Social Protection of the Rural Population: The need to think outside the box Robert Holzmann, World Bank. ISSA General Assembly, Beijing 2004 ILO Session, Wed., Sept. 15, 2004. Background and main Conclusions.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' ISSA General Assembly, Beijing 2004 ILO Session, Wed., Sept. 15, 2004' - yetty


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Social Protection of the Rural Population:The need to think outside the boxRobert Holzmann, World Bank

ISSA General Assembly, Beijing 2004

ILO Session, Wed., Sept. 15, 2004


Background and main conclusions
Background and main Conclusions

  • Social Protection for the rural area is a challenge: High coverage can be achieved, but essentially only at high fiscal costs which poorer countries typically can not afford

  • 69% of population in low-income countries (> USD 735) and 51% in low-middle income countries (> USD 2,935) live in rural area

  • Low and low-middle income countries constitute 40% and 39% of the population, respectively

  • Special challenges for rural population in LICs include:

    • Natural forces and agricultural events/risks are more important

    • Traditional “social” contingencies receive low priorities (except health)

    • Upstream measures of prevention crucial (e.g. non-agricultural employment)

    • Attention on four risk management instruments: basic health, social pension, public works, and conditional cash transfers

    • Social funds and CCD – important processes to provide social services

    • Social insurance-type programs can be effective but are often not efficient


Selected underpinnings of statements structure
Selected Underpinnings of Statements: Structure

  • Social protection and the role of risk management in development

  • Social protection in the rural context

  • Income support for the elderly: Role and limits of social pensions

  • The role and limits of social security organizations in the extension of coverage


Sp and the role of risk management in development
SP and the Role of Risk Management in Development

  • Its is increasingly understood that assisting individuals, households and communities in dealing with diverse forms of risks is crucial for accelerated poverty reduction and sustainable economic and human development


Risk and poverty
Risk and Poverty

Income

Poverty line

Time


Risk and poverty1
Risk and Poverty

Income

Shock

Poverty line

Time


Risk and poverty2
Risk and Poverty

Income

Shock 1

Shock 2

Poverty line

Time


Risk and extreme poverty
Risk and Extreme Poverty

Income

Poverty line

Time


Risk and extreme poverty1
Risk and Extreme Poverty

Income

Poverty line

Shock

Time


Education stock development
Education Stock Development

Education

0 %

Age


Education stock development1
Education Stock Development

Education

Shock 1

0 %

Age


Education stock development2
Education Stock Development

Education

Shock 2

Shock 1

0 %

Age


Social risk management framework basic thrusts
Social Risk Management FrameworkBasic Thrusts

  • The poor are typically most exposed to diverse risks (natural and man-made)

  • The poor have the fewest instruments to deal with these risks

    The poor are the most vulnerable as shocks have strongest welfare consequences

    The high vulnerability makes them risk averse and thus unable or unwilling to engage in higher risk/high return activities

    A reduction in vulnerability is thus both an end and a means of development


Srm leads from intervention based definition of social protection
SRM leads from Intervention-based Definition of Social Protection …

Labor Market Interventions

LM regulation

LM programs (active/passive)

Wage setting

Social Security

Social Insurance

9 contingencies a la ILO

Social Safety Nets/Social Assistance


To objective risk based definition of social protection
… to Objective/Risk-based Definition of Social Protection Protection …

Social Protection is defined as public strategies, policies, and programs that

  • assist individuals, households, and communities better manage risk, and

  • provide support to the critically vulnerable

    Other objectives consistent with the approach is the achievement “solidarity” in a society and a human rights based approach


Social protection in the rural context
Social Protection in the Rural Context Protection …

  • There is a difference between urban and rural population with regard to risk and vulnerability

  • The identified drivers for the vulnerability to poverty suggest other than traditional instruments

  • The crucial position of agricultural production reflected in the importance of two instruments

    • Food security, as public instrument, is gradually replaced by improvement of transport and markets

    • Rural-rural migration as private instrument is much more important than rural-urban or South-North migration (example: East Asia crisis of 1997 and 1998)


Identified drivers for the vulnerability to poverty
Identified Drivers for the Vulnerability to Poverty Protection …

  • Risk and Vulnerability Assessments, as new analytical instruments in client countries (over 25 en route or done)

  • Recent Kenya study identifies 5 main drivers:

    • Exposure to malaria

    • Level of access to non-agricultural activities

    • Level of fertilizer use

    • Level of literacy

    • Access to market outlets such as the existence of feeder roads


Key social protection instruments
Key Social Protection Instruments Protection …

  • Public Works Programs to stabilize income and poverty

    • The value of infrastructure to reduce vulnerability

    • Risk diversification (supplementing cash crop) and risk taking (iff credible as available and implemented)

    • Unemployment benefit scheme for highly informalized economies

  • Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT)

    • Transfers to poor families contingent on certain behaviour (such as school attendance or health facility visit if children)

    • Successful design and implementation in Mexico and Brazil (and under consideration in many other countries)

  • Creation of Employment in Rural Areas

    • Most effective upstream/preventive measure

    • Crucial to supportive productivity growth in agricultural production

  • Role of Risk Mitigating Instruments limited (health and pensions)

    • Issues of risk pooling (financing) and service supply (health)

    • Difference in demand: high for health, low for pension products


Income support for the elderly
Income support for the elderly … Protection …

  • Reduced importance of family-based arrangements due to globalization, urbanization, falling fertility rates, and HIV/AIDs

  • Coverage extension more difficult than envisaged (ISSA, Stockholm 2001)

  • Good reasons why demand for formal and mandated pensions among rural population limited

    • Many other risks that are more pressing

    • Low credibility of public and private institutions

    • Low demand for annuity-type products if insurance market of other risks is incomplete


Role and limits of social pensions
…Role and limits of social pensions Protection …

  • Increasing interest in and support of non-contributory pensions by NGOs, academia and international organizations (UN, ILO, WB)

  • Central question for LICs: Poverty and vulnerability status of elderly compared to other groups to determine trade-off

  • First empirical investigations in 15 African

    • Support request to explore the contribution of NCP to poverty reduction and socio-economic development

    • Do not support unconditional demand for implementation in all LICs

    • Costs for benefits of 70% of poverty threshold at age 60 range from more than 1% to more than 3% of GDP

    • 2% of GDP in LICs is some 15% of tax revenue, and about 5-10 times the expenditure on social assistance for all other groups

  • Future work – design and implementation issues, such as how to distribute small amounts of money to thinly populated rural areas where the age of the beneficiaries cannot be established


The role and limits of social security organizations in the extension of coverage
The role and limits of social security organizations in the extension of coverage

  • Rural population will continue to depend on government for provision and regulation of social protection services

    • Role of traditional (and centralized) public sector channels low compared to community driven approaches such as social funds (as government agencies), user associations, mutualities, and NGOs

    • Importance of regulation and co-financing is potentially high

  • Role of traditional and employment-linked social security organizations is likely to remain limited for foreseeable future

  • Existing social insurance institutions (in rural area) can contribute to coverage extension, but only at the margin

    • Earnings-related old-age benefits have low priority, compared to access to basic health care

    • Disability benefits are conjectured to have high demand, but supply has failed to materialize

  • There are encouraging signs that social protection is receiving more attention in the developing debate during the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) process


ad