1 / 12

Lab 2 – Hot Air Balloon Competition

Lab 2 – Hot Air Balloon Competition. EG1003 Section E2 Date of Experiment: 9/16/11 Date Due: 9/21/11 Tony Tao and Abe Gellis. Overview. Experimental Objective Introduction Background Information Materials Procedure Data and Observations Results Conclusions. Experimental Objective.

yen
Download Presentation

Lab 2 – Hot Air Balloon Competition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lab 2 – Hot Air Balloon Competition EG1003 Section E2 Date of Experiment: 9/16/11 Date Due: 9/21/11 Tony Tao and Abe Gellis

  2. Overview • Experimental Objective • Introduction • Background Information • Materials • Procedure • Data and Observations • Results • Conclusions

  3. Experimental Objective • Construct a lighter-than-air construct capable of lifting as much weight as possible, for as long as possible, using minimalist design to reduce costs.

  4. Introduction • Ideal lighter-than-air aircraft lifts as effectively as possible at low expense • Improving the design of the aircraft improves its utility in the fields that use it • Experiments with minimal design can lead to new, more affordable solutions and designs here and in other fields

  5. Background Information • Lighter-than-air aircraft have existed for over 200 years, pioneered by the Montgolfier brothers • Predominantly used for entertainment, advertising, and a convenient way to work at a high elevation • Varying kinds of aircraft, some using gases lighter than air

  6. Background Information • Ideal Gas Law • Heating the air inside a balloon expands the air and lowers density by forcing some out • Upward buoyancy force • Volume of less-dense heated air weighs less than surrounding cool air, is propelled upward • Archimedes’ Principle • Buoyancy force is equal to the amount of air displaced by the balloon

  7. Background Information • Test hot air balloon designs by attaching paper clips and holding over a heater • Goal was to design a balloon that floated as long as possible, holding as much weight (in paperclips) as possible, for as little as possible • Judged and compared to other balloons in class to determine the balloon that was the most effective at the best price (Time Afloat) x (Paperclips Carried)Cost of Balloon Materials

  8. Materials Used • Some materials had a “cost” attached • Tissue paper (1 sheet) (10¢) • Gluestick (free) • Scissors (free)

  9. Procedure • Plan design for aircraft • Obtain/purchase materials • Construct balloon • Attach paperclip(s) • Hold balloon over heater, fill with hot air, then let go and allow balloon to rise • Modify balloon as necessary and perform up to two more trials

  10. Data and Observations • Balloon sank immediately after filling • Time spent in air was due to the fact that it fell slowly • Balloon did not cover heater sufficiently • Heater heated air around as well as inside balloon • Outside air was same density as inside, providing no buoyancy • Only one trial conducted • No addition or modification would remedy the fundamental issue

  11. Results • Balloon achieved no flight nor buoyancy • Was incapable of lifting any weight • Was cheap • Achieved 6th place in class • Mostly due to cheapness

  12. Conclusion • Successful minimal design • 10¢ total cost • …at the expense of functionality • Other designs allowed little or no hot air to escape • Were willing to spend more money in order to create larger, more capable designs • Did not account for size of heater • Only redeeming feature was lightness • Minimalism is important, but should not be first priority

More Related