International relations audit outcomes
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 20

International relations audit outcomes 2010-11 September 2011 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 55 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

International relations audit outcomes 2010-11 September 2011. Reputation promise/mission.

Download Presentation

International relations audit outcomes 2010-11 September 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


International relations audit outcomes 2010 11 september 2011

International relations audit outcomes

2010-11

September 2011


Reputation promise mission

Reputation promise/mission

The Auditor-General of South Africa has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) of South Africa, it exists to strengthen our country’s democracy by enabling oversight, accountability and governance in the public sector through auditing, thereby building public confidence.


National pfma audit outcomes 2010 11

National PFMA audit outcomes 2010-11


International relations pfma audit outcomes 2010 11

International relations PFMA audit outcomes 2010-11


3 year progress towards clean administration

3 Year progress towards clean administration


Audit outcomes comparison to 2009 10 departments

Audit outcomes comparison to 2009-10Departments


Movement in audit outcomes from 2009 10 departments

Movement in audit outcomes from 2009-10Departments

1


Audit outcomes comparison with 2009 10 public entities

Audit outcomes comparison with 2009-10 Public entities


Movement in audit outcomes from 2009 10 public entities

Movement in audit outcomes from 2009-10Public entities

1


Areas of material misstatements in financial statements

Areas of material misstatements in financial statements


Corrections of material misstatements identified by auditors

Corrections of material misstatements identified by auditors


Predetermined objectives pdo findings department and public entities

Predetermined objectives (PDO) findings Department and public entities

Presentation

2010-11: 0%

2009-10: 0%

Non-compliance

2010-11: 100%

2009-10: 0%

Not reliable

2010-11: 0%

2009-10: 0%

Not useful

2010-11: 100%

2009-10: 0%


Unauthorised irregular and fruitless and wasteful expenditure departments and public entities

Unauthorised, irregular, and fruitless and wasteful expenditureDepartments and public entities*

* Amounts are actual (no extrapolation of errors)/Based on actual disclosures and samples tested


Summary of findings on supply chain management

Summary of findings on supply chain management


Areas of findings on non compliance with laws and regulations

Areas of findings on non-compliance with laws and regulations


Findings on hr management focus areas departments

Findings on HR management focus areasDepartments


Findings on it control focus areas

Findings on IT control focus areas


Four focal points based on prior audit risk assessment

Four focal points (based on prior audit, risk assessment)

Procurement/SCM

Increase in irregular expenditures

Procurement processes and contract management: non compliance with TRs

Performance of other remunerative work by employees: interest in suppliers to the DIRCO and other state institutions

HR Management

Long term acting in key positions

Vacancies in key positions for extended periods of time

Performance management: not all senior managers entered into performance agreements

Predetermined Objective

Reporting

Non compliance with laws and regulations relating to PDO reporting

Reporting on PDOs not useful as defined by FMPPI

IT Management

Security and user management controls partially implemented

IT governance framework developed, partially implemented


Progress made in implementing key controls

Progress made in implementing key controls


Progress in addressing high risk areas

Progress in addressing high risk areas

Higher

Lower


  • Login