1 / 41

SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN (SMDFP) OCTOBER 16, 2009

SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN (SMDFP) OCTOBER 16, 2009. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN. 1.0 TAKE-OFF POINTS. 1.1 Mayor Jose Rafael E. Diaz’s Vision of an orderly, livable, vibrant & dynamic community that is environment-sensitive .

yan
Download Presentation

SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN (SMDFP) OCTOBER 16, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN (SMDFP) OCTOBER 16, 2009

  2. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 1.0 TAKE-OFF POINTS 1.1 Mayor Jose Rafael E. Diaz’s Vision of an orderly, livable, vibrant & dynamic community that is environment-sensitive. Local Government Units need to have a forward - looking Framework Plan that will have a built - in flexibility to incorporate new thrusts and new ideas that may come in incremental or packaged systems

  3. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 1.0 TAKE-OFF POINTS 1.2 The San Mateo Comprehensive Development Plan prepared by MJE Consultants in July 2001. 1.3 The Geo-Hazard Maps prepared by 1.4 The Metro Manila transport plan prepared by MMDA and all other studies by LLDA, DENR, as well as, the Lungsod Silangan Proclamation

  4. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 2.0 DESTINATION POINT 2.1 A New Town image reflecting the vision of its leaders and the fulfillment of the dreams andaspirations of people seeking the fullness of life in a setting that enhances man-nature kinship.

  5. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 3.0 CLEARING THE WAY 3.1 RECTIFYING & REFORMINGINFRASTRUCTURES a. Traffic &Transportation b. Utilities, Power, Water, Telecommunication

  6. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 3.0 CLEARING THE WAY c. Natural Settings WATERWAYS USE OF LAND ABUSE OF LAND LANDFILL AIR QUALITY WATER QUALITY ECOSYSTEMS TOPOGRAPHY

  7. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 3.0 CLEARING THE WAY 3.2 RECTIFYING & REFORMING MAN-MADE STRUCTURES BUILDING STRUCTURES AND HOUSING MAN MADE STRUCTURES Above & Below Ground BUILDING STRUCTURES AND HOUSING MAN MADE STRUCTURES Above & Below Ground FACTORIES & PLANTS 3.3 OTHER OBSTACLES

  8. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 4.0 SETTING THE APPARATUS 4.1The Warm Bodies : Inventory of Resources 4.2 The Socio-Economic System

  9. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 4.0 SETTING THE APPARATUS 4.3 The Educational System 4.4 The Geo-Hazard & Risk Areas

  10. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 4.0 SETTING THE APPARATUS 4.5 Protecting the Earth : Man-Nature Transaction 4.6 Governance

  11. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 5.0 GOING FULL STEAM 5.1 Governance Platform : The Command Center (SMDA-San Mateo Development Authority) 5.2 The Legal Platform : Zoning & Development Regulations, Building Ordinances

  12. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 5.0 GOING FULL STEAM 5.3 The Earth Platform: Setting of the Framework Plan 5.4 The Social, Cultural & Public Services Platform : People Oriented Interventions

  13. SAN MATEO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN 5.0 GOING FULL STEAM 5.5 The Environment Platform : “Touching the Earth lightly” 5.6 The Economic & Financial Platform : Livelihood, Wealth Generation & Financial Systems

  14. Benchmark NCSO 2007 Population Data : 184,860 6.0 HUMAN RESOURCES INVENTORY

  15. PLANNING BENCHMARK EDUCATION: 2010 BENCHMARK  Elementary School Population (ages 7-12 years): 28,708 28,708 ÷ 40 students / classroom = 717.7 ÷ 2 shifts = 359 classrooms As per MJE Report : Projected no. of classrooms for 2010 = 179 Difference: 180 classrooms High School Population (ages 13-16 years): 16,874 16,874 ÷ 40 students / classroom = 421.85 ÷ 2 shifts = 211 classrooms As per MJE Report : Projected no. of classrooms for 2010 = 116 Difference: 95 classrooms College Population (ages 17-22 years): 16,222 – assumed to be absorbed by schools in Metro Manila

  16. EDUCATION: 2010 BENCHMARK Current Land Requirements for School: Computing for School Building Space Requirement: 359+211 = 570 x 90 sq.m. per classroom = 51,300 sq.m. + 30% ancillary space = 66,690 sq.m. Computing for School Campus Land Requirement: 66,690 sq.m. x 2 = 133,380 sq.m. or 13.34 hectares for Elem. & HS

  17. PLANNING BENCHMARK EDUCATION: Projection for 2015 (5 years hence)  Elementary School Population (ages 7-12 years): 35,522 35,522 ÷ 40 students / classroom = 888 ÷ 2 shifts = 444 classrooms Additional Classrooms Needed: 444-359 = 85 High School Population (ages 13-16 years): 19,138 19,138 ÷ 40 students / classroom = 478 ÷ 2 shifts = 239 classrooms Additional Classrooms Needed: 239-211 = 28 College Population (ages 17-22 years): 25,311 – assumed to be absorbed by schools in Metro Manila (The Plan is to encourage prestigious universities to locate a branch in San Mateo.)

  18. EDUCATION: 2015 Additional Land Requirements for School in 5 years: Computing for School Building Space Requirement: 85 + 28 = 113 x 90 sq.m. per classroom = 10,170 sq.m. + 30% ancillary space = 13,221 sq.m. Computing for School Campus Land Requirement: 13,221 sq.m. x 2 = 26,442 sq.m. or 2.64 hectares additional for Elem. & HS

  19. HOUSING: 2010 BENCHMARK Total population: 211,138 ÷ 5 (average family size per household) = 42,228 households As per MJE Report : Projected no. of households for 2010 = 31,794 Difference: 10,434 households Plus emerging households (female ages 25-39) = 25,377 households Total Difference: 35,811 households Current Land Requirement for Housing: 42,228 + 25,377 = 67,605 x 250 sq.m. (area of housing unit)= 16,901,250 sq.m. or 1,690 hectares

  20. HOUSING: 2015 Total population: 263,494 ÷ 5 (average family size per household) = 52,699 households Plus emerging households (female ages 25-39) = 28,333 households Total Households: 81,032 Additional Land Requirement for Housing in 5 years: 81,032-67,605 = 13,427 x 250 sq.m. (area of housing unit)= 3,356,750 sq.m. or 335.67 hectares

  21. WASTE GENERATION: 2010 42,228 households x 25 kilos of waste per household per day = 1,055,700 kilos of waste per day 2015 52,699 households x 25 kilos of waste per household per day = 1,317,475 kilos of waste per day

  22. WATER SUPPLY: 2010 42,228 households x 200 liters per household per day = 8,445,600 liters per day 2015 52,699 households x 200 liters per household per day = 10,539,800 liters per day

  23. POWER SUPPLY: 2010 42,228 households x 1000 kw per household per month = 42,228,000 kw per month 2015 52,699 households x 1000 kw per household per month = 52,699,000 kw per month

  24. TEACHERS: 2010 Elementary Teachers : 28,708 ÷ 40 = 718 High School Teachers : 16,874 ÷ 40 = 422 Total Teachers : 45,582 ÷ 40 = 1,140 2015 Elementary Teachers : 35,522 ÷ 40 = 888 (Additional requirement: 170) High School Teachers : 19,138 ÷ 40 = 478 (Additional requirement: 56) Total Teachers : 54,660 ÷ 40 = 1,366 (Additional requirement: 226)

  25. POLICEMEN AND FIREMEN: 2010 211,138 ÷ 1,000 = 211 policemen and 211 firemen As per CPD Report : Projected no. of policemen and firemen for 2010 = 116 each Difference: 95 policemen and 95 firemen 2015 263,494 ÷ 1,000 = 263 policemen and 263 firemen (Additional requirement: 52 each)

  26. FOOD REQUIREMENTS: 2010 RICE = 1 cavan per household per month 42,228 households + 25,377 emerging households = 67,605 households 67,605 households x 1 cavan per household per month = 67,605 cavans per month Target 20% rice sufficiency: 67,605 cavans x 20% = 13,521 cavans per month Current Land Area Requirement for Rice Production: Assuming a yield of 50 cavans of rice per hectare 13,521 cavans x 12 months = 162,252 cavans per year 162,252 cavans per year ÷ 2 planting seasons = 81,126 cavans per season 81,126 cavans ÷ 50 cavans per hectare = 1,622.52 hectares of rice lands

  27. FOOD REQUIREMENTS: 2015 RICE = 1 cavan per household per month 52,699 households + 28,333 emerging households = 81,032 households 81,032 households x 1 cavan per household per month = 81,032 cavans per month Target 20% rice sufficiency: 81,032 cavans x 20% = 16,206 cavans per month Land Area Requirement for Rice Production in 5 years: Assuming a yield of 50 cavans of rice per hectare 16,206 cavans x 12 months = 194,472 cavans per year 194,472 cavans per year ÷ 2 planting seasons = 97,236 cavans per season 97,236 cavans ÷ 50 cavans per hectare = 1,944.72 hectares of rice lands (1,622.52 + 322.20)

  28. RING ROADS HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 PROPOSED CONNECTION TO Q.C. SANITARY LANDFILL TO LANDFILL LIMIT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREAS WITH LOW TO HIGH LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY SAN MATEO-ANTIPOLO TOLL BY-PASS ROAD FLOOD-PRONE AREAS MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  29. RING ROADS HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 PROPOSED CONNECTION TO Q.C. SANITARY LANDFILL TO LANDFILL PROPOSED DIKE EXISTING TOWN CENTER PROPOSED SPORTS AND CIVIC CENTER URBAN RENEWAL DEVELOPMENT LOW TO HIGH LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY FLOOD-PRONE AREAS NEW CIVIC CENTERS FLOOD-PRONE AREAS SAN MATEO-ANTIPOLO TOLL BY-PASS ROAD MARIKINA ANTIPOLO SAN MATEO RIZAL FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN

  30. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 SANITARY LANDFILL Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  31. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Riverside Development = 30 Hectares MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  32. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  33. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  34. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares Redevelopment of Existing Subdivisions = 1,230 Hectares Redevelopment of Existing Subdivisions = 1,230 Hectares MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  35. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares Redevelopment of Existing Subdivisions = 1,230 Hectares New Civic Centers = 50 Hectares New Civic Centers = 50 Hectares MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  36. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares Redevelopment of Existing Subdivisions = 1,230 Hectares Food Production Area = 190 Hectares New Civic Centers = 50 Hectares Food Production Area = 190 Hectares MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  37. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares Redevelopment of Existing Subdivisions = 1,230 Hectares San Mateo-Antipolo Toll By-Pass Road 6 Lanes = 13 Kms. New Civic Centers = 50 Hectares Food Production Area = 190 Hectares San Mateo-Antipolo Toll By-Pass Road 6 Lanes = 13 Kms. SAN MATEO-ANTIPOLO TOLL BY-PASS ROAD MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  38. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares TO LANDFILL Redevelopment of Existing Subdivisions = 1,230 Hectares Infrastructure Development Ring Roads = 26 Kms. New Civic Centers = 50 Hectares Food Production Area = 190 Hectares San Mateo-Antipolo Toll By-Pass Road 6 Lanes = 13 Kms. SAN MATEO-ANTIPOLO TOLL BY-PASS ROAD Infrastructure Development Ring Roads = 26 Kms. MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  39. RING ROADS Inner Ring Development: Town Plaza, Sports and Civic Center = 150 Hectares HIGHWAY SIMILAR TO SCTEX RODRIGUEZ PROPOSED C6 Riverside Development = 30 Hectares SANITARY LANDFILL Flood-Prone Areas Development = 160 Hectares New Housing Areas = 590 Hectares TO LANDFILL Redevelopment of Existing Subdivisions = 1,230 Hectares New Civic Centers = 50 Hectares Food Production Area = 190 Hectares San Mateo-Antipolo Toll By-Pass Road 6 Lanes = 13 Kms. SAN MATEO-ANTIPOLO TOLL BY-PASS ROAD Infrastructure Development Ring Roads = 26 Kms. MARIKINA ANTIPOLO 7.0 SAN MATEO RIZAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PLAN

  40. SAN MATEO FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN 8.0 PLATFORM DIAGRAM GOVERNANCE PLATFORM LGU SMDA (San Mateo Development Authority POOL FUNDSGENERATION TRUSTEEBANK LEGAL PLATFORM SOCIALCULTURALPUBLIC SERVICE PLATFORM ENVIRONMENTPLATFORM ECONOMIC& FINANCIAL PLATFORM FRAMEWORK PLAN (EARTH PLATFORM)

  41. SAN MATEO FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9.0 MILESTONE-SETTINGS for Implementation a. IMMEDIATE b. SHORT TERM c. MEDIUM TERM d. LONG TERM

More Related